HR vs Titus

[Fisheater]

??? I am sorry friend, I am confused. Why would the set apart (Holy) Spirit say anything different than YHWH's set apart instructions?

There is no "choosing" of which instructions of God we should follow...right?

So you follow all 683 laws....? Even the Temple Laws?

[119]

So you follow all 683 laws....? Even the Temple Laws?

You meant 613. There is not really 613 laws. That is rabbinical.

Baptism (mikveh) is a Temple law. Do you follow that?

You need to know the "to who, when, how to, and where" of these commandments.

Perhaps if I ask a question it might help?

If you do not have parents, should you keep the obeying parents commandment?

If the criteria for a commandments does not present itself, does that mean the commandment is abolished? Of course not.

Our High Priest has all of this under control in the Heavenlies, in a higher order, where such criteria still exists and He offers intercession daily.

[Fisheater]

You meant 613. There is not really 613 laws. That is rabbinical.

Baptism (mikveh) is a Temple law. Do you follow that?

You need to know the "to who, when, how to, and where" of these commandments.

Perhaps if I ask a question it might help?

If you do not have parents, should you keep the obeying parents commandment?

If the criteria for a commandments does not present itself, does that mean the commandment is abolished? Of course not.

Our High Priest has all of this under control in the Heavenlies, in a higher order, where such criteria still exists and He offers intercession daily.

Look .. Can you answer a simple question ... Then we move on ...

Answer the question ... do you believe in the understood and accepted Christian Doctrine of the Trinity .... 3 persons One God.

[TheAnonymousCoward]

Look .. Can you answer a simple question ... Then we move on ...

Answer the question ... do you believe in the understood and accepted Christian Doctrine of the Trinity .... 3 persons One God.

lol you do nothing but ask questions and answer none. This is hilarious. This has nothing to do with the topic.

[Fisheater]

lol you do nothing but ask questions and answer none. This is hilarious. This has nothing to do with the topic.

It is your faith .. I am asking questions to understand what you believe. Why do you have to question me .... I have pretty much laid my faith bare in this forum .

But you do not answer ... You try to confuse and obfuscate.

Is Jesus God?

[119]

It is your faith .. I am asking questions to understand what you believe. Why do you have to question me .... I have pretty much laid my faith bare in this forum .

But you do not answer ... You try to confuse and obfuscate.

Is Jesus God?

If a glass pitcher of sweet tea is considered as a whole to be "tea" then Jesus is in the same sense also "God."

However, just as the glass pitcher is not tea, His flesh and will is not God. God is Spirit.

Just as the fullness of the sweet tea dwelled inside of the glass pitcher, the fullness of the Word (God) dwelled inside of Jesus.

However, unlike the sweet tea example, the flesh and body of Jesus conformed to the Word of God, and was obedient to the Word of God, being placed under God and us under Him. To such a perfect extent, that for all intended purposes, He was and is the reflection or image of God as the Word of God shines through Him.

In the same way, is it that a light bulb light, or is a light bulb simply a vessel for light, and perhaps a vehicle to deliver light?

[Fisheater]

If a glass pitcher of sweet tea is considered as a whole to be "tea" then Jesus is in the same sense also "God."

However, just as the glass pitcher is not tea, His flesh and will is not God. God is Spirit.

Just as the fullness of the sweet tea dwelled inside of the glass pitcher, the fullness of the Word (God) dwelled inside of Jesus.

However, unlike the sweet tea example, the flesh and body of Jesus conformed to the Word of God, and was obedient to the Word of God, being placed under God and us under Him. To such a perfect extent, that for all intended purposes, He was and is the reflection or image of God as the Word of God shines through Him.

In the same way, is it that a light bulb light, or is a light bulb simply a vessel for light, and perhaps a vehicle to deliver light?

So you do not believe in the Trinity .... and you do not believe that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of the Father .... God made Man?

Glad you could clarify this all for us ..... I say be gone ...You teach a different Gospel. Those would be the myths that Paul wrote about ..... I think you have even perverted the Jewish Tradition.

[Red Baron]

If a glass pitcher of sweet tea is considered as a whole to be "tea" then Jesus is in the same sense also "God."

However, just as the glass pitcher is not tea, His flesh and will is not God. God is Spirit.

Just as the fullness of the sweet tea dwelled inside of the glass pitcher, the fullness of the Word (God) dwelled inside of Jesus.

However, unlike the sweet tea example, the flesh and body of Jesus conformed to the Word of God, and was obedient to the Word of God, being placed under God and us under Him. To such a perfect extent, that for all intended purposes, He was and is the reflection or image of God as the Word of God shines through Him.

In the same way, is it that a light bulb light, or is a light bulb simply a vessel for light, and perhaps a vehicle to deliver light?

You need to take this act on the road they way you tip-toe around the question. Maybe you and Tiny Tim can do this act while you are "Tip-toeing through the roses".


I still don't have a clue as to what your answer is. But, of course, you answered it that way intentionally.
Mat 5:37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

[Al Swearengen]

Look .. Can you answer a simple question ... Then we move on ...

C'mon, Fisheater...I posed a question in post #2 that you seem to have missed...perhaps you can take a shot at that, THEN we can move on?

[Emily]

You meant 613. There is not really 613 laws. That is rabbinical.

Baptism (mikveh) is a Temple law. Do you follow that?

You need to know the "to who, when, how to, and where" of these commandments.

Perhaps if I ask a question it might help?

If you do not have parents, should you keep the obeying parents commandment?

If the criteria for a commandments does not present itself, does that mean the commandment is abolished? Of course not.

Our High Priest has all of this under control in the Heavenlies, in a higher order, where such criteria still exists and He offers intercession daily.

Actually the answer to that question would be 'yes' if you consider the purpose of the law to obey your parents. Obeying your parents unto the Lord so that your life can be long and prosperous is to obey your parents teachings that guide a straight, good, honest life in obedience to God.

Your parents don't need to be alive for you to continue to obey their teachings.

We should continue to live our lives in honor to them as we bear their name and God still knows if we are obeying their teachings that ultimately honor Him.

Ephesians 6

1 Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. 2 “Honor your father and mother”—which is the first commandment with a promise— 3 “so that it may go well with you and that you may enjoy long life on the earth.

I do have a question in light of this thread - if the HR believe that there will be sacrifices again in the millennium then you must believe that somehow God still thinks they are necessary. Then why are you not doing them now?

What changes occur for the millennium that don't exist now? And if it is because it is inconvenient - didn't God have them set up a tent during their wilderness days?