HR vs Titus

[119]

So Who chooses what laws of the OT to follow ? Is it a personal choice guided by your personal Holy Spirit?

??? I am sorry friend, I am confused. Why would the set apart (Holy) Spirit say anything different than YHWH's set apart instructions?

There is no "choosing" of which instructions of God we should follow...right?

[Fisheater]

??? I am sorry friend, I am confused. Why would the set apart (Holy) Spirit say anything different than YHWH's set apart instructions?

There is no "choosing" of which instructions of God we should follow...right?

What is the set apart Holy Spirit?

[119]

What is the set apart Holy Spirit?

The spirit or desire to follow the set apart instructions. A drive or desire leading to the truth of His Word. The purpose and function of the Holy Spirit. Holy simply means "set apart" It is the opposite of common or profane.

[Fisheater]

The spirit or desire to follow the set apart instructions. A drive or desire leading to the truth of His Word. The purpose and function of the Holy Spirit. Holy simply means "set apart" It is the opposite of common or profane.

Ok ..so you do not believe in the Trinty ... One God 3 distinct persons?

[119]

Ok ..so you do not believe in the Trinty ... One God 3 distinct persons?

Yes and no...we would have to begin a process of defining terms, going into the Latin of the creation of that doctrine. Its adaptation into English creates logical fallacies.

The unity of the 3, or "essence" of the 3, that the original Trinity model describes is the "Word of God" and there is only one "Word" or seed.

Most do not want to go this deep, but simply say "one God, 3 persons" as if that really means something. The Bible explains it all much better than the actual Trinity doctrine.

[TheAnonymousCoward]

Side note: I love how obeying the Word of God is now just called "HR".

[Fisheater]

Side note: I love how obeying the Word of God is now just called "HR".

It seems you choose what parts of Word Of God to obey.

[Fisheater]

Yes and no...we would have to begin a process of defining terms, going into the Latin of the creation of that doctrine. Its adaptation into English creates logical fallacies.

The unity of the 3, or "essence" of the 3, that the original Trinity model describes is the "Word of God" and there is only one "Word" or seed.

Most do not want to go this deep, but simply say "one God, 3 persons" as if that really means something. The Bible explains it all much better than the actual Trinity doctrine.

Answer the question ... do you believe in the understood and accepted Christian Doctrine of the Trinity .... 3 persons One God.

[Fisheater]

??? I am sorry friend, I am confused. Why would the set apart (Holy) Spirit say anything different than YHWH's set apart instructions?

There is no "choosing" of which instructions of God we should follow...right?

So you follow all 683 laws....? Even the Temple Laws?

[119]

So you follow all 683 laws....? Even the Temple Laws?

You meant 613. There is not really 613 laws. That is rabbinical.

Baptism (mikveh) is a Temple law. Do you follow that?

You need to know the "to who, when, how to, and where" of these commandments.

Perhaps if I ask a question it might help?

If you do not have parents, should you keep the obeying parents commandment?

If the criteria for a commandments does not present itself, does that mean the commandment is abolished? Of course not.

Our High Priest has all of this under control in the Heavenlies, in a higher order, where such criteria still exists and He offers intercession daily.