Page 12 of 13 FirstFirst ... 210111213 LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 127

Thread: ‘Looks Like Weimar Germany’: The Viral Photo Out of CT Giving Some Gun Owners Chills

  1. #111
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,577

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dilligaf View Post
    aYEP...
    Just to let you know, dili, you're one of my friends =D

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Deep in the Matrix
    Posts
    5,869

    Default

    According to the existing regime, I must be a felon just needing some gulag training time.... and I can't even guess the number of counts now.


    It matters not what is right when they execute by what they write.
    The evil one seeks to change the laws and the times, making snares for whom trapped they might.

    As the tangles and tribulations of this world grow, brighter does the light in the darkness glow.
    And soon the separation shall be clear and complete, the goats from the sheep, the chaff from the wheat.

    My time here is short, of this I am sure. To those who fight on, be strong and endure.
    For in the long run, the race is near done. Stand firm and stand free but continue to run.

  3. #113
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    South Fork of the Clearwater River
    Posts
    12,694

    Default

    Gun Control in the Third Reich
    Disarming the Jews and “Enemies of the State”
    Stephen P. Halbrook


    http://www.independent.org/store/book.asp?id=106#t-2



    Highlights
    •The perennial gun control debate in America for the past half-century did not begin here. Many of the same arguments for and against the freedom to own firearms were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany's Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration and prohibition. Those measures restricted law-abiding persons who complied with the law, but had no effect on the ongoing political violence between the Communists and the emerging Nazis. There would be unintended consequences.


    • Weimar Germany’s gun registration laws set the stage for the tragic deaths of people like Alfred Flatow, a German Jew who won first place in gymnastics at the 1896 Olympics. In 1932, Flatow registered three handguns as required by a decree of the Weimar Republic. After Adolf Hitler seized power in 1933, the registration records were used to identify, disarm, and attack “enemies of the state,” a euphemism for political opponents and Jews. By 1938, the Nazis had deprived Jews of the rights of citizenship and were ratcheting up measures to expropriate their assets. Police used the registration records to locate and arrest Jewish gun owners such as Flatow, who was turned over to the Gestapo and, like millions of others, was later murdered in the Holocaust.


    • Countless books about the Third Reich and the Holocaust fail to mention the firearms restrictions that rendered political opponents and Jews defenseless. A skeptic could surmise that a better-armed populace might have made no difference, but the National Socialist regime certainly did not think so—it ruthlessly suppressed firearm ownership by disfavored groups. Newly discovered documents reveal that even before the Nazis seized power in 1933, a future legal advisor to the Gestapo, Werner Best, proposed the execution of anyone who refused to surrender their firearms. Also, weeks before the 1938 pogrom known as the Night of Broken Glass, even Jews who surrendered their registered firearms were taken into custody by the Gestapo—a little-known fact that suggests that a major action against the Jews was already planned.


    • The history of Germany, 1918–1938, is a telling case study in the timeless gun control debate that provides an important historical perspective to recurrent questions: Should the people have a right to keep and bear arms? Should firearms be restricted to the police, military, and favored groups designated by the government? Is it possible that restrictions may go horribly wrong? What lessons does history teach?

    Synopsis

    A year before Adolph Hitler took power in 1933, the German Interior Minister directed that gun registration records be made secure to keep them from falling “into the hands of radical elements.” His efforts proved futile: the records fell into the hands of the Nazi government, which used them to disarm their political enemies and the Jews. By 1938, the Nazis had deprived Jews of the rights of citizenship and were ratcheting up measures to expropriate their assets.

    The horrific consequences have names etched in our consciousness: the Night of Broken Glass and the Holocaust. Countless books have been written about Hitler’s dictatorship yet have failed to mention the disarming of Jews and “enemies of the state.” Attorney and author Stephen P. Halbrook fills this yawning gap with his original and eye-opening work, Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and “Enemies of the State.”

    Based on newly discovered documents from German archives, diaries, and newspapers of the time, Gun Control in the Third Reich presents the hidden history—in a readable but well documented, scholarly manner—of how the Third Reich made use of gun control to disarm and repress its enemies and consolidate its power.

    The book is divided into four units, each with three chapters, representing distinct historical periods. It spans the two decades from the defeat of Germany in World War I in 1918 through the Night of the Broken Glass in 1938. A concluding chapter presents a panorama of events during World War II.

    Dancing on a Volcano: The Weimar Republic

    Part I begins by describing the chaos in the aftermath of World War I, a time when the struggling Weimar Republic repressed Communist insurgencies as well as attempted rightist coups, such as Hitler’s Beer Hall Putsch. The suppression could be brutal: those caught with arms, including Red Cross nurses in one instance, were executed on the spot. The Versailles Treaty and repressive measures resulted in confiscations of firearms from law-abiding persons, while extremist groups secreted arms caches and fought in the streets.

    In 1928, after public debate involving arguments heard even today, the liberal Weimar Republic adopted Germany’s first comprehensive gun control law. The law required licenses for the acquisition and carrying of firearms, giving the authorities discretion to deny licenses based on purported lack of need or disqualification based on a subjective determination of dangerousness. The law failed to end the extremist violence.

    In secret documents that were discovered by the authorities, future Gestapo legal adviser Werner Best proposed a Nazi takeover in which Jews would be denied food and those refusing to surrender their guns would be executed. Partly in reaction to the discovery of such extremist plans, the Weimar era ended with a decree that could later facilitate Best’s plan—a requirement to register all firearms and authorization to police to confiscate them. The Interior Minister warned that the registration records must not fall into the hands of any extremist group. Yet they could have anticipated by then that the Nazis, the leading extremist group, could take power.

    1933: Enter the Führer

    Part II describes how the Nazis seized and consolidated power. In 1933 Hitler was named Chancellor, the Reichstag was set ablaze, emergency powers were granted to suspend constitutional rights, and Hitler’s police initiated mass searches and seizures for subversive printed matter and firearms. Social Democrats and other political opponents in this onslaught were invariably described as “Communists.” Gun licenses held by Jews and the politically unreliable were cancelled. Police raids to search for and confiscate firearms and publications swept Germany, from passengers’ baggage at railway stations to o ces of political parties and to entire Jewish communities.

    A case study of Brandenburg, the German state that surrounds Berlin, shows how police used lists of licensed gun owners, assessed whether they were “politically reliable” to Nazism, and if they were not, cancelled their licenses and confiscated their firearms. Social Democrats were automatically disqualified. This was yet another step to nip in the bud resistance to National Socialism.

    National Socialist power was consolidated in part by defining and disarming “the politically unreliable” and the “enemies of the state.” Legal theories were debated as to how to secure the New Order. The result was that persons in such categories could be disarmed, deprived of civil rights, and thrown into concentration camps.

    Gleichschaltung: Forcing into Line

    Part III focuses on the five years of repression that followed. During this time Nazi leaders leisurely conferred on amendments to the Weimar firearms law, which could be revised as society was cleansed by National Socialism. The Night of the Long Knives verified that Hitler could murder any opponent. Undesirables were placed in camps where labor made them “free,” and the Nürnberg Laws stripped Jews of their citizenship. The first major “Aryanization” of a Jewish business, seen in Europe as an attack on private enterprise, was the expropriation of a major firearm manufacturer owned by Jews.

    By now Germany still had “laws” to which citizens were subject, but also Gestapo prerogative which courts could not review. The Gestapo banned independent gun clubs, arresting their leaders who failed to surrender their o ces to Nazis. Gestapo counsel Werner Best issued a directive to police authorities throughout Germany forbidding issuance of firearm permits to Jews.

    In 1938, Hitler signed a new firearm law which exempted Nazi Party members from some restrictions. It ostensibly made long guns easier to acquire, but the “reform” was hollow in that firearm ownership was denied to the perennial “enemies of the state,” many of whom had been removed from society. For the first time, it prohibited Jews from the firearms industry and banned ordinary .22 hollow point ammunition. The annexation of Austria had occurred just in time to apply the law there.

    Reichskristallnacht: Night of the Broken Glass

    Part IV begins with the prelude to the Night of the Broken Glass. Weeks before the November 1938 pogrom, police ordered Jews to surrender their firearms and other weapons. Jews who turned in their registered arms at police stations were still turned over to the Gestapo. The registration records revealed those who failed to comply. This represents substantial evidence, albeit ignored by historians, that a major action against the Jewish population was already planned, as disarming them would minimize the risk of resistance. An incident was needed to unleash the pogrom.

    With the shooting of a German diplomat in Paris by a teenage Polish Jew—the incident they were waiting for—Hitler approved and Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels orchestrated the Night of the Broken Glass. This massive search and seizure operation, allegedly for weapons, entailed the ransacking of homes and businesses, and the arson of synagogues. SS chief Heinrich Himmler decreed twenty years in a concentration camp for possession of a firearm by a Jew.

    Diaries and other eyewitness accounts record how the Jewish victims themselves, including gun owners as well as those not remotely connected to gun ownership, described the onslaught. Rusty revolvers and bayonets from the Great War were confiscated from Jewish veterans who had served with distinction. Valuables were stolen in house searches allegedly for guns. These accounts by the victims, many of them women and children, bring to life the horror of having one’s house ransacked by Nazis and countless husbands and fathers arrested and thrown into concentration camps. The Night of the Broken Glass has rightly been described as the prelude to the Holocaust.

    Whither the German Resistance? Whither the Holocaust?

    The book’s concluding chapter presents a potpourri of events during World War II, the second half of the “thousand year Reich,” to explore the effects of the disarming policies of the previous two decades. Jews about to be deported to death camps were searched one last time for weapons. Why was there no armed partisan movement in Germany, and why was resistance limited to small groups like the White Rose students and the military conspirators who were unsuccessful in killing Hitler? In the occupied countries, the Nazis decreed the death penalty for possession of a firearm, but there were instances of heroic armed resistance by Jews, particularly the Warsaw ghetto uprising.

    Despite the significance of the perceived necessity by the Nazis ruthlessly to disarm political enemies and Jews, historians have failed to address this critical subject. Gun Control in the Third Reich presents the first analysis of the use of gun control laws and policies to pave the way for and consolidate the Hitler regime, rendering Jews and all other “enemies of the state” defenseless.

  4. #114
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    13,437

    Default

    That's too close for comfort chicom.
    -
    -

  5. #115
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    3,871

    Default

    If everyone just said no they couldn't enforce these laws, there are too many of us. Gandhi did it in India they all just said no. If 80 million gun owners just said "NO" there would be no way they could ever enforce gun registration. Look what happened in Canada the gun registration failed.
    Some people are only alive because there are laws against killing them.

  6. #116
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NE PA
    Posts
    22,542

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Hand View Post
    If everyone just said no they couldn't enforce these laws, there are too many of us. Gandhi did it in India they all just said no. If 80 million gun owners just said "NO" there would be no way they could ever enforce gun registration. Look what happened in Canada the gun registration failed.
    There is that.

    But it would seem that those in Conn. (and probably others to come) did not think that way.

    Such is the way of the avg. citizen now, the path of least resistance.
    “I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” Barry Goldwater.

    Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.H. L. Mencken

  7. #117
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    680

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lavender View Post
    Just like sheep that will eventually be taken to the slaughter. They know where they are being lead, but are going anyway......because they feel they must mind the government. That is what I take from the photo anyway.

    ‘Looks Like Weimar Germany’: The Viral Photo Out of Connecticut That’s Giving Some Gun Owners Chills

    Dec. 31, 2013 10:32pm
    Jason Howerton
    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...owners-chills/

    A now-viral photo showing a long line of Connecticut residents waiting to register their guns and ammo is circulating across the Internet — and it’s sending chills down the backs of some gun owner.


    Photo credit: George Roelofson/WTNH.

    Connecticut gun owners are rushing to register certain firearms and ammunition that will be considered illegal contraband in the new year.

    Under a wide-ranging gun control law passed after the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, they have until Tuesday to submit the paperwork with the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection.

    “Holy crap. Looks like Weimar Germany,” Twitter user @votermom said of the photo.

    “Another disgusting picture from Connecticut . . .men waiting in line to register guns with the government,” user @chipwoods commented.
    “First, they came for the guns,” @PaulRReyes added.

    “Life is too short to live in a state that does this to its residents,” Twitter user @lancemfisher declared.

    And there are plenty more comments where that came from.

    Continued......
    Look at all the lambs heading to the slaughter. If I was in Commiectict
    I would stand in line just to say two words... Molon Labe! Then just walk off.
    Time To Party Like It's 1773

    "Liberty or death, what we so proudly hail
    Once you provoke her, rattling of her tail
    Never begins it, never, but once engaged...
    Never surrenders, showing the fangs of rage

    Dont tread on me

    So be it
    Threaten no more
    To secure peace is to prepare for war
    So be it
    Settle the score
    Touch me again for the words that youll hear evermore...

    " - Metallica

  8. #118
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Region 6
    Posts
    1,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Miradus View Post
    Kayso, I doubt anyone stood in that line to register a weapon that the government didn't already know about through purchases.
    That is just a cop out. The truth of the matter is we do not know what kind of list they have or how complete that list is. Furthermore even if there is one the bulk of the machine probably doesnt have access to it since the idea of having one is still frowned upon by a large swath of the population. The feds have been struggling for decades to come up with a list and their only real success has been the CHL list and lists from states where people have allowed these Alinsky socialists to take power and demand registration of them. Out of those states even those lists are poor because many just refuse to register and take their chances. If they truly had an adequate list they wouldn't be fighting to make one now.

    The simple truth of the matter is for every one of us who would not comply there are 10 if not 100 more people who will. They will tell themselves that there are more important things than liberty like family, mortgages and assorted other things. Those people have made their decision and there is nothing wrong with that. Everyone will soon face the same decision that those in New York, Commiefornia, Connecticut and the various other socialist strongholds have had to make and I am sure there are many people who thump their chest online who will shamefully shuffle their way in line outside their poloce station like these men even after their impassioned rants and raves online.

    It is unreasonable to expect anyone to come to your rescue. These days if you choose to live a free man you should expect to be on your own. The system is designed that way for a purpose. The powers that be actively seek to marginalize us and make our lives lonely and hard. The idea being that if you would just give up on this kooky idea of liberty you too could live the good life under the watchful benevolent care of big brother.

    If you are reading this. You are the resistance.

  9. #119
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    10,517

    Default

    I'd like to hear some stories about people registering weapons and magazines that they didn't possess.

    If it's not about infringement and you tell them you have 5,000 rifles and 50,000 standard capacity magazines, what can they say?

  10. #120
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5,771

    Default

    My sentiments run very close to yours, Kayso, especially your last paragraph.

    Somewhere, last fall, I saw an article written by an off-beat journalist who gets it.

    He stated that, from here on out, there would be an increasing number of Americans who will be drawing their hard line, having determined "their hill to die on".

    He wasn't speaking figuratively, either.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •