Feds, Nevada rancher facing off over public lands

[Seditious]

I think state assault charges for the federal personnel would be a good follow up.

[dilligaf]

Found it:
100 yards you say?

http://mapper.acme.com/?ll=36.88130,...ark%20Co.%20NV

you are in arizona.. the link i posted was the spot..

[breezy]

And if anyone is thinking that is a terrible thing to do...remember this....


With 21 children inside I might add....

[Petedtom]

you are in arizona.. the link i posted was the spot..

Well I gotta say, that ridge in Arizona is waaaayyyy more than 100 yards for sure.

Got me there Lenno.

[breezy]

I think state assault charges for the federal personnel would be a good follow up.

I would definitely be going after Reid, big time on this!!!

That homo needs to swing

[Seditious]

you are in arizona.. the link i posted was the spot..

It came up as something else. How far was it from the bridge deck to a place on the ridge that would cover the federal rear?

[Miradus]

Why are y'all trying to figure out the range to that ridgeline again? It looked dang far to me. I can't judge distance in a photo.

Does this matter or is it just Lenno trying to win the internet again?

[Petedtom]

Why are y'all trying to figure out the range to that ridgeline again? It looked dang far to me. I can't judge distance in a photo.

Does this matter or is it just Lenno trying to win the internet again?

Well he does want the internet for his very own but it was the ridge behind the rear of the truck on the bridge. 100-200 yrds? Maybe a bit more?

Really not that important though.

I will concede Arizona is farther than 100 yards however.

[JasmineinNM]

Here is something I found on another website.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. Date: Saturday, 12 April 2014
Time: 1840 ET
To: Steve Quayle
From Doug Hagmann

At 1750 hours ET, I was contacted by my source within the Department of Homeland Security regarding the current situation at the Bundy Ranch. To put it bluntly, the people are being hoodwinked into believing that the situation is being resolved. It is not. It is a strategic de-escalation to fool the public. This source stated that the retreat of the BLM agents and the release of the cattle was actually crafted as a potential plan yesterday (Friday, 11 April 2014) based on the following:

1. A military assessment of satellite and drone surveillance imagery of the “patriot resistance. Drones under the control of the U.S. military were in use, taking real-time photographic images of not just the activity at the ranch, but "identifying the protesters, any arms and any supplies they might have or be carrying. “Mission accomplished.”
2. Real-time communication intercepts between patriots on-site and their off-site support;
3. Active monitoring of internet traffic regarding the coverage of events at ranch;
4. The monitoring of real-time video from the scene.

This source stated that a response by the patriot movement was anticipated, although exceeded their expectations. Although this was a real operation, they also ran this as a test case for future government operations once they saw the response. They were also actively managing the media, in some cases threatening to cut off White House access to anyone covering the event.

Despite this, the coverage by the alternative media began to create a public relations problem that was not easily managed. Note the lack of acknowledgment by the White House regarding this event. They are intentionally framing it as a state issue, despite the fact that all federal response has been and continues to be from the White House. There is a reason for this – a reason that has not been identified in any of the public reports to date. I will explain in further detail in a follow-up report on Sunday, after this source attends [redacted] to obtain more specific information about future federal operations. Regardless, according to this source, the government will take back ‘their land’ as they must to fulfill international obligations. It was never about grazing rights or anything other than (1) “securing clear title” to the land, and (2) further demonizing any patriotic resistance. It is my understanding, based on the information from this source, that it is a critical task to create a situation that will also advance their agenda of gun control and confiscation.

A more detailed report will follow on Sunday, 13 April 2014, with additional and much more specific information about their inside plans and future operations.PLEASE MAKE THIS VIRAL!

[breezy]

Why are y'all trying to figure out the range to that ridgeline again? It looked dang far to me. I can't judge distance in a photo.

Does this matter or is it just Lenno trying to win the internet again?

Yup