Page 2 of 95 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 949

Thread: Europe is toast...Thread

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    Calais migrants: 2nd night of mass attempts to reach EnglandPublished July 29, 2015Associated Press


    Facebook78 Twitter92 Email Print


    Migrants wait near a motorway leading to the ferry port to cross the English channel, in Calais, northern France. (AP)


    CALAIS, France – Migrants rushed the tunnel linking France and England repeatedly for a second night on Wednesday and one man was crushed by a truck in the chaos, deepening tensions surrounding the thousands of people camped in this northern French port city.
    Eurotunnel said it had blocked more than 37,000 such attempts by migrants to reach Britain since January.
    There were conflicting numbers of people involved Wednesday, ranging from 150 to as many as 1,200. But French authorities and the company agreed there had been about 2,000 attempts on each of two successive nights.
    "Calais is a mirror of conflicts tearing up regions of the world"
    - Bernard Cazeneuve, Interior Minister
    The numbers have been growing as has the sense of crisis in recent weeks, spurred by new barriers around the Eurotunnel site, labor strife that turned the rails into protest sites for striking workers, and an influx of desperate migrants.
    Many British officials have expressed growing alarm at what they see as a potential influx of foreigners, although it's not clear how many people have successfully made the passage. Nine migrants have died in the attempt since June, said France's interior minister.

    "This exceptional migrant situation has dramatic human consequences," said Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve. "Calais is a mirror of conflicts tearing up regions of the world."
    About 25 migrants were seen getting off a public bus in Calais on Wednesday with a police officer who left them by the side of the road. Several said they were returning from a night of trying to cross the Channel.
    "(We) come from train here and tomorrow, inshallah, try again in the train," said an Eritrean who would not give his name as he planned further attempts to reach England.
    Natacha Bouchart, mayor of Calais, said about 150-250 migrants tried repeatedly overnight to reach the Eurotunnel. French officials said it was the second night of mass attempts on the tunnel. Gilles Debove, a police union official, counted about 2,000 attempts for a second night running. Debove said officers pushing back the migrants counted between 750 and 1,200 people.
    Bouchart told France Info radio migrants are trying to reach England from France "at all costs" — first crossing a busy highway and then trying to stow away on trucks waiting to board trains. She says Britain, France and the Eurotunnel need to work together on the issue.
    The man killed overnight, believed to be a Sudanese man in his mid-20s, was crushed by a truck as he tried to stow away, Debove told The Associated Press.
    Cargo trucks were lined up overnight for several kilometers (miles) leading to the Eurotunnel freight loading zone, some of them stuck on a highway overpass above one of the many makeshift migrant camps. In a tweet, Eurotunnel said passenger trains were delayed an hour because of the overnight activity.
    The company called for help from both the French and British governments.
    "It's become a phenomenon which is beyond our means," said spokesman John Keefe. "We're just a small transport company operating in a little corner of Europe."
    Keefe said attacks on the fences are organized. "This is very clearly criminal gangs or human traffickers who coordinate attacks on the fences," he said.
    British Prime Minister David Cameron, speaking during his visit to Singapore, described the crisis as "very concerning," but that there was no point in "pointing fingers of blame." Other British officials blamed the government in France, where officials said Eurotunnel also needed to do more.
    The British government has agreed to an extra 7 million pounds ($11 million) of funding for measures to improve security at Calais.
    The Conservative Party lawmaker for Folkestone, Damian Collins, said French authorities needed to better secure their side of the tunnel. Cazeneuve said 120 government security forces were being dispatched immediately to Calais.
    "They have allowed people willingly to break into the Channel Tunnel site. I can't believe they would be that lax in protecting an airport or another sensitive facility," Collins said. "But that has happened constantly throughout the summer."
    The tunnel is studded with high-tech equipment to detect migrants, who increasingly have headed to the trains as the Calais port also increases security. Philippe Wannesson, who runs an association in support of the migrants, questioned whether the attempts were organized, saying the varying nationalities make that unlikely.
    Migrants have continued to press northward, fleeing war, dictatorship and poverty in Africa and the Middle East.
    Two ships unloaded in Italy on Wednesday, one carrying 435 passengers and 14 bodies and another with 692 migrants.
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default How Is It The UK Has Better Security Than We Do?

    Britain’s borders trampled underfoot: Calls to send in the army as hundreds of migrants storm fences around Calais Channel Tunnel entrance for THIRD night running – desperate to clamber on trains bound for Kent, whatever the cost


    • Demands growing for Britain to send in Army to help with Calais chaos as migrants continue to besiege Calais
    • For the third night running, migrants tried to storm the Channel Tunnel where French authorities have 'lost control'
    • It comes after a Sudanese man was killed in the chaos early on Wednesday morning after being crushed by a truck
    • Senior Tory MP Andrew Percy said: ‘It is time we considered more radical options, including the use of the Army'



    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3hLnvJchK
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Region 1, NWO
    Posts
    2,967

    Default

    I'm sure the British government doesn't mind having terrorists there. Luton is already filled as a terrorist training ground. London is about halfway there now. The people of Britain...well, they don't count. The NWO must be ushered in and you can't do it without 3rd Worlders and terrorists. So, in comes the pen. "Somalis are now citizens of the USA." "Sudanese are welcome in Britain." The citizenry have no say. So, France isn't good enough for the Sudanese? Looks like France could care less.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lenno View Post
    Britain’s borders trampled underfoot: Calls to send in the army as hundreds of migrants storm fences around Calais Channel Tunnel entrance for THIRD night running – desperate to clamber on trains bound for Kent, whatever the cost


    • Demands growing for Britain to send in Army to help with Calais chaos as migrants continue to besiege Calais
    • For the third night running, migrants tried to storm the Channel Tunnel where French authorities have 'lost control'
    • It comes after a Sudanese man was killed in the chaos early on Wednesday morning after being crushed by a truck
    • Senior Tory MP Andrew Percy said: ‘It is time we considered more radical options, including the use of the Army'



    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3hLnvJchK
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    Sweden: 30 grenade attacks in 6 months in Muslim-dominated Malmö

    August 4, 2015 8:52 am By Nicolai Sennels 17 Comments
    While the Swedish elite celebrates itself by calling the former Viking land a “humanitarian superpower” for letting in hundreds of thousands of Muslims within a handful of years, the country is falling apart. Recently there were four grenade explosions in Malmö, Sweden’s third largest city and famous for its high percentage of Muslim

    UK: Jihadi sentenced to 2 1/2 years released after 11 months

    August 3, 2015 By Robert Spencer 24 Comments
    “Sentencing, Judge Charles Wide QC told Ali he had made a ‘really determined attempt’ to evade justice. He said: ‘It is absolutely clear you are an extremist and you do support terrorism.’” Good thing he was released early. Maybe he can get a job in the Cameron government. “Extremist released: 31 months jail for terror […]
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    Swearing at the camera and throwing rocks: The moment British-registered cars speed out of Dunkirk migrant camp 'run by armed London gangsters who charge refugees £1,200 for ferry trip across Channel'

    • Cars bearing British plates spotted at Dunkirk migrant camp where British gang of people smugglers are believed to operate
    • Man with British accent, wearing Rolex and claiming to be a 'south London gangster' has threatened reporters and is now being sought by police
    • MailOnline photographer's car was pelted with rocks at gates of camp - where at least six British cars were parked
    • Gang believed to be using cars to smuggle migrants - which attract less attention at customs. Police claim some are even hidden in suitcases
    • Mayor said 30 British cars have been seized in the last year including a £70,000 Jaguar - but police have so far failed to make an arrest

    By Peter Allen In Teteghem For Mailonline
    Published: 13:41 EST, 11 August 2015 | Updated: 05:50 EST, 12 August 2015



    1.3kshares
    785
    View
    comments

    Offering an obscene gesture, the driver of a British-registered VW Passat speeds out of a migrant camp in northern France where London gangsters are believed to be offering one-way illegal passages across the Channel for £1,200 cash.
    His aggressive sign was followed by violence, including rocks being thrown at a MailOnline photographer's car by others around the camp.
    It follows similarly dramatic scenes at the same camp in Teteghem, near Dunkirk, on Monday when UKIP MEP Mike Hookem was allegedly threatened with a gun as he tried to visit.

    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17



    Clashes: The driver of this British-registered VW flips the bird at the cameras as he speeds out of Teteghem migrant camp after a violent confrontation in which rocks were thrown by others at the MailOnline photographer's car


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Inside: A white van is parked alongside a migrant tent. It was one of at least six UK-registered cars there today whose presence will have to be explained to authorities


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Hopes: Migrant families such as these are reported to be paying around £1,200 to be smuggled into the UK

    Share
    1.3k shares



    The politician spent today filing witness reports to the French police.
    While there is no suggestion the cars pictured are involved in smuggling, the presence of so many British-registered cars at the camp over the last year has prompted police and local mayor Franck Dhersin to investigate and impound cars.
    The mayor pointed to at least six UK-registered cars that could be seen around the camp today. They included two white vans, a Ford Focus, an Audi Quattro, a Vauxhall Vectra, a Passat and a Mercedes.
    Similar cars have been seized around Teteghem in the past, with the French authorities believing that smart cars with British plates could easily go undetected by customs and security officials trying to stop illegal migration to the UK.
    Mr Dhersin added he was particularly concerned at reports made to police about a ‘South London gangster’ who wears a Rolex watch and ‘runs the camp’ as a criminal enterprise.

    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Conditions: The migrants are living in shipping containers and tents that are dotted around the wooded area, paid for a provided by the local council


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Desperate: Around 200 migrants from Syria, Iraq to Vietnam live at the camp at the moment. Numbers have tripled in the last year

    A police officer said: ‘There are English-based people operating from the camp, using lorries, vans and cars to smuggle the migrants.
    ‘They are hidden in the contents of the vehicle, in one case we believe inside a suitcase.’
    Meanwhile, Mr Dhersin said: ‘Since last year we’ve seized more than 30 British cars from around the camp including a pristine Jaguar which would have been worth 100,000 Euros.’
    ‘The camp is becoming more and more dangerous because the gangs don’t want the publicity. Since the camp was established seven years ago, we usually have a couple of incidents a year when people are knifed or shot, but it is usually the smugglers fighting among themselves.’
    Confirming Mr Hookem’s report about firearms being in the camp, Mr Dhersin said he saw a pistol during a visit with journalists last week. ‘It was the first time I was shown a gun,’ said Mr Dhersin.
    Those throwing rocks at journalists today appeared to be of Iraqi origin, and Mr Dhersin said dealing with them was particularly difficult.

    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Questions: People at the camp and the authorities wereasking why the six vehicles with British plates were parked inside


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Seized: The mayor said he had confiscated 30 British cars in the last year with British registrations. Pictured is an Audi Quattro today at the camp


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Smart: A Mercedes sits inside the camp. The mayor explained among the cars that have been seized was a pristine Jaguar worth £70,000 in the last few months


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Fleet: Another UK-registered van is parked on the makeshift gravel driveway inside the Teteghem camp

    ‘The police make arrests but have to release the suspects because it’s impossible to find a translator to speak the languages they claim to speak, such as Farsi,’ said Mr Dhersin.
    ‘There is also lack of evidence to prosecute,’ he said, suggesting that migrants based in England were under the command of the gangsters.
    He added that last month, one suspected British-based people smuggler was chased by Belgian police from Ostend but abandoned his BMW car and ran inside Teteghem camp, and the police were unable to track him down.
    Mr Dhersin said he was particularly angry about the smugglers, because he saw Teteghem as a ‘five star camp’, complete with toilets, running water, and shipping containers converted into shelters for the migrants to sleep him.
    ‘My war is with the smugglers not the migrants – they are poor people,’ Mr Dhersin said. ‘The camp is out of town, nowhere near homes. I allow it on condition there are no more than 100 people there.’
    Mr Dhersin said the ‘only solution’ to the migrant crisis is a ‘military blockade’ of north Africa.
    ‘It’s a very difficult problem. For me, the solution is the Australian solution (referring to Australia’s decision to turn away Vietnamese boat people). Stop the boats – a blockade. Once they reach Europe, it’s too late.’

    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Provisions: Migrants return from picking up food and drinks from a Lidl store that is a short walk away


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Hopeful: Migrants at Teteghem line up for medical aid at the camp on the outskirts of Dunkirk


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Gangs: A man of Middle Eastern appearance but with a British accent (not pictured) claiming to be a 'south London gangster' has been threatening reporters who approach the site


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Second front: After security has been stepped up at the camp in Calais to stop migrants attempting to get onto the Channel Tunnel, attention has been focused on the camp outside Dunkirk, 30 miles away from the Chunnel

    Despite his efforts, Mr Dhersin was heckled by a worker for French aid charity Medecins Du Monde.
    Who is providing the water, food for these people,’ the mayor replied.
    When later asked about the confrontation, the worker said: ‘The migrants don’t want to be filmed.’
    As French police prepared to raid the camp to search for the suspected weapon, they confirmed that they were looking for the ‘man with a British accent’ who wears a gold Rolex watch.
    In his 30s, he is said to be of Middle Eastern appearance, and he drives an Audi Quattro with tinted windows.
    The self-styled hoodlum has been seen around the camp this week, but was said to have ‘disappeared following all the publicity about the alleged gun,’ said the police source.
    The £1,200 cash buys a direct passage to Kent, usually in the back of a van or car. When migrants arrive they claim asylum, or else disappear into the black economy.
    The Teteghem camp is more than 30 miles from the Channel Tunnel, but French officials fear it will become the new hub from which to enter Britain illegally, as security around Calais improves.

    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    Claim: UKIP MEP Mike Hookem (pictured with the local mayor) took to Twitter yesterday to say he'd reported the gun incident to police in Dunkirk



    Call the police: Mr Hookem has not elaborated on the circumstances of the incident, but his claims come as towns and cities in northern France struggle to cope with an influx of migrants hoping to reach Britain


    • SHARE PICTURE


    Copy link to paste in your message





    +17


    This is the moment Mike Hookem claims a migrant threatened him with a handgun as he visited a camp on the outskirts of Dunkirk. The UKIP MEP and defence spokesman said his group were invited to access a woodland site by the migrants but claimed the 'situation immediately turned nasty'

    Teteghem, which was set up around seven years ago, is currently home to about 200 migrants from Iraq, Syria, Iran and Vietnam living mainly in the shipping containers.
    Families including an infant and young children are among those at the camp – although it is mostly young men.
    While thousands of migrants try to reach the UK every night through the Eurotunnel or by ferry, the number of migrants at the Dunkirk camp has more than tripled in the past year.
    The actions of the migrants at Calais have caused long delays for British holidaymakers and lorry drivers crossing the Channel.
    Recent security improvements at Calais have thrown a fresh spotlight on the camp outside Dunkirk, causing its numbers to swell.
    Thousands more holidaymakers could be affected if similar problems arise at the port of Dunkirk, which is used by 2.5 million people each year.
    Eve-Marie Dubiez, who works for the Friends of Teteghem charity, said: ‘Lots of English cars come here,’ she said. ‘They get people to Calais’ from where they will travel on to the UK', she said. 'If a first attempt to get to Britain was unsuccessful, there would be more.


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3icBLIEY7
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism

    Posted on July 25, 2015 by Baron Bodissey
    The latest essay by our English correspondent Seneca III is a study of the works of the French writer Guillaume Faye.
    To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism
    by Seneca III
    Preamble
    “Are these the last days of Europe?”
    — Walter Laqueur, from The Last Days of Europe: Epitaph for an Old Continent, New York St. Martin’s Griffin, 2009.
    This series of three essays explores the ongoing destruction of the West, of the origins of this debacle and of its enablers, both the deliberately misinformed and the malignant peddlers of Euro-ethnic cleansing. It also looks into a deeply perplexing future, mainly through the eyes and thought processes of one particular philosopher and political scientist, the French scholar Guillaume Faye.
    With a doctorate in Political Science from the Institute of Political Science in Paris, Professor Faye was one of the principal theoreticians of the French ‘Nouvelle Droit’ in the 1970s and ’80s, prior to his developing an empathy with the Identitarian movement. He has also been a journalist at Figaro-Magazine,Paris-Match, Charlie Hebdo and Valeurs Actuelles.
    Faye became known as the enfant terrible of the Nouvelle Droit. In 2000 he was sentenced to a heavy fine by a French court for his book ‘The Colonisation of Europe: True Discourse Against Immigration and Islam (L’Aencre). It was this action that first drew my attention. I have long held that anyone who brings down the wrath of the proponents of a proto-tyranny upon his or her shoulders is or has been presenting an idea or suggesting a course of action that is perceived as an existential threat to such totalitarian, monotheistic entities and their enforcement apparatchiks, and has hit the nail right on the head.
    In essence such reactions are the typically Pavlovian responses to any ethnic, political or intellectually critical examination of an extant regime, and are an early sign of its desperation, a precursor to the full draconian reaction that will follow as the inevitable demise of its gratuitous construct begins. (A recent UK example of this is the British Establishment’s ridiculing, demonization and then what was, effectively, the elimination of the English Defence League — albeit a flawed and poorly-led organisation, but nonetheless one with a justifiable ethno-cultural raison d’être.)
    Of his many books and publications three of Faye’s most seminal contributions to the dialectic are available in English language editions: ‘Why We Fight’ [A], ‘Convergence of Catastrophes’ [B] and ‘Archeofuturism’ [C]. The seven abstracts below from ‘Why We Fight’ are from his METAPOLITICAL DICTIONARY (187 entries in all) which constitutes its main thrust, although I would describe it as more of an encyclopaedia than a dictionary.
    In the two short chapters following the FOREWORD and PREFACE, PRELIMINARY ELEMENTS and STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES, Faye deals with what he describes as ‘The Logic of Decline’, ‘Economic Principles’, ‘Islam Against Europe’, ‘The Dangers of European Disarmament’, ‘The Menace From the South’ and ‘Towards a Eurosiberian Strategic Doctrine’. A few short quotations from the Forward, Preface, Elements and Strategic Principles are interspersed throughout this essay with the intention of giving the reader a general flavour of those arguments as contained in the more substantialAbstracts.
    Also from the Metapolitical Dictionary I have abstracted in Part I the definition of Archeofuturism, but I have left it without comment or elaboration as it is a complex proposition that begs a detailed analysis. WhilstPart II of the series will look at Convergence of Catastrophes, Part IIIwill return to an examination of Archeofuturism — European Visions of the Post-catastrophic Age.
    A . Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance by Guillaume Faye. Arktos Media Ltd (2011), ISBN-10: 1907166181 (Paperback) [N.B. This English language edition is a translation from the German. It first appeared, in French in 2001 and then the German edition in 2006, and hence it does in places show its age.]
    B. Convergence of Catastrophes by Guillaume Faye. Arktos Media Ltd (2012), ISBN-10:1907166467 (Paperback).
    C. Archeofuturism: European Visions of the Post-Catastrophic Age byGuillaume Faye (Author), Michael O’Meara (Foreword). Arktos Media Ltd (2010), ISBN-10: 1907166092. (Paperback)
    Part I — Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance
    In view of the recent destruction — or predominantly self-destruction — of Greece as an independent sovereign State, and in order to understand the inevitable destiny of fundamentally flawed socio-political engineering experiments implemented by hubristic power seekers, one has only to observe this event and the further slow, painful disintegration of the European Union.
    Furthermore, on an even more disastrous scale, from Malmö to Chattanooga, from Rotherham to Madrid, from Boston to London to Paris to New York and to all points of the Western compass, a bloody tide of barbarism surges, seemingly free to do as it wills, and it is well on course to impose such destruction likewise throughout the whole of the Euro/Anglosphere.
    In order to appreciate how this has come about we have to ask why those not of Islam but who enable its predatory advance either wilfully ignore or deny the old axiom that “a house built on sand will eventually collapse”, and its logical extension “a house built on quicksand will quickly disappear”. Should they not consider the reality that they will neither survive nor leave anything of substance whosoever triumphs in the conflict they have brought upon us, for when such a house collapses or disappears, into the vacuum so created there comes some form of chaos, its magnitude being directly proportional to the size and duration of their calamitous building project?
    Many philosophers and political scientists, from the early Greeks on through the Enlightenment and beyond to the present day have attempted to dissect the causes of catastrophe and the subsequent chaos into which it leads. Mathematical treatments of Chaos Theory are well established, and this is not surprising in light of the fact that philosophy is at root as much a mathematical discipline as it is metaphysical, for it utilises symbolic logic in the form of both quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of cause and effect in order to reach its conclusions. What methodology Faye employs in his work is not explained in the books so we can only speculate. However, George Boole, who first introduced the concept of Boolean Algebra (The mathematical Analysis of Logic, 1847 and An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, 1854) predicated his theses upon the idea that variables could be represented as the values ‘true’ and ‘false’ by the use of the operators ‘AND’, ‘OR’, ‘NOT’, thus combining simple propositions into compound propositions, and was himself first and foremost a philosopher.
    Abstracts and Quotations
    (All bolds in block quotes are Faye’s or his editors’. Quotations in square brackets are from other sources. Footnotes and comments in italics are mine.)
    ETHNIC CHAOS
    A historical situation in which a people or civilisation loses its ethnic basis due to the mass immigration of aliens.
    Ethnic chaos was a factor in the decomposition of the Roman Republic and Empire, Pharaonic-Egyptian civilisation and many ancient Greek cities. Europe is presently in the grip of a colonising settlement by overseas peoples. A civilisation disappears once it loses its original ethnic basis. It becomes a patchwork quilt in which any idea of a city, community and destiny is impossible.
    Ethnic chaos signals the pure and simple disappearance of a people and a civilisation — and of true democracy — as all of the classical Greek philosophers warned.
    An ethnically heterogeneous population — a kaleidoscope of communities — becomes an anonymous society, without soul, without solidarity, prone to incessant conflicts for domination, to an endemic racism (‘every multi-racial society is a multi-racist society’) — ungovernable because there’s no shared vision of the world. Ethnic chaos is an open door to tyranny.
    In the name of multi-racialism, capitalism and democracy have made ethnic chaos part of their programme. Men are stripped of their attachments and remade as consumers, each interchangeable with the other, each without an identity.[1] But this is stupid. Man never actually loses his memory or ancestral identity. A society of ethnic chaos leads in the long run not to prosperity, harmonious individualism or republican rule, but to political and social disorder. We’re now catching the first glimpses of this chaos. From it there will perhaps come the post-chaos — that is regeneration — a return to homogeneity.
    Quotations:


    “The history of the world is a history of the struggle between peoples and civilisations for survival and domination. It’s a battleground of wills to power… the base of everything is biocultural identity.”
    … “Let us remember that Socrates was a Hoplite and Xenophon a military magistrate.”
    …[‘Apart from material gain I have two purposes. First, by expanding our territory to make Mycenae Achaea’s paramount power. Second, to close the coast to seaborne Dorians infiltrating across the Gulf. The Wall already bars their passage across the Isthmus.’
    ‘They are crossing in numbers, sire?’ Bunus inquired.
    The movement,’ said Atreus grimly, ‘has attained the proportions of a mass immigration. They land and take to the mountains where they reinforce the Goatmen. If we don’t stop it we’ll become embroiled in a ceaseless war of attrition. And not Mycenae alone, every civilised city will suffer.’
    Heroes shook doubtful heads. Some smiled behind their hands. Goatmen raids and counter-raids had become a way of life, a repetitive military exercise to keep warriors on their toes, a salutary irritant like blistering a horse. None conceived them a major menace. Atreus’ far-seeing vision proved everybody wrong.
    — From the novel ‘Warrior in Bronze’ by George Shipway, Peter Davis Ltd., 1977.]
    1. The destruction of personal identity is the singular, most important step, the sine qua non, imposed by a self-selected few, the new post-war ruling elite, who use their grip on the levers of power to dominate and direct human affairs in their own ambitious and pecuniary interests. By reducing all down to the level of the lowest common denominator they intend to create a passive population, or one otherwise perpetually occupied in low-level ethnic conflict, and thus create an easily controllable Global Slave State or, by another definition, The New World Order.
    POST-CHAOS
    Chaos is that state of disorganisation and anarchy affecting a collectivity of any sort once it’s beset by catastrophe. The post chaos is that phase when a new order is constructed on the basis of a revolutionary metamorphic logic. It’s the eternal cycle of life, death and rebirth as expressed in Nietzsche’s theory of the eternal return of the identical [2] as well as in René Thom’s [3]theory of catastrophes. The society we know can’t be fixed, the system can’t be saved. This is the illusion of every conservative tendency. The sole solution to the present situation will come from chaos — from civil war, economic depression etc. — that overthrows established mentalities and makes acceptable and indispensable that which was previously unimaginable. Only in situations of chaos are the given variables changed and does it become possible to establish another order — the post-chaos. Only in crisis, then, will a solution be found [4]. To construct a new home, it’s first necessary that the old one collapses. It’s not a pessimist but a realist who sees this.
    Quotations:
    …“We need, in a word, to be alert to demobilising mysticisms, to a pretentious but hollow intellectualism, to easy refuge in spirituality or philosophy whose attitudes, postures and loopholes are ultimately tangential to the resistance.”
    … “Distrust is no less warranted in respect to that artificial and instrumentalised ‘paganism’ that threatens to succumb to either a new age disconnected from any worldly struggle, or worse, in the name of a badly understood polytheism, to Xenophilia, and a catastrophic ‘Love of the Other’”.
    … “Granted the ‘system’ still holds all the political cards…we have nothing but our ideas, our convictions and our will — certainly not much, compared to the usurpers of power who daily confuse minds, poison souls and take all imaginable measures to initiate the destruction of all identities…We possess, however, the highest trump — the trump of trumps which those who are attempting to erase all traces of their own blood do not possess and can never possess. We know where we are going because we know where we came from. We possess the memory of the history that is also the memory of the ‘mythos’ of our ‘ethnos’, the consciousness of an unbroken line of ancestors from whom we have inherited the most valuable of all privileges: namely the privilege to be like them.”
    2. Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Cambridge University Press (2001), pp. 194. This is one of Nietzsche’s central propositions.
    3. René Frédéric Thom (1923-2002) was a renowned French mathematician. He was principally a topologist and singularity theorist (and winner of the Fields’ Medal) but later moved on to become the founder of Catastrophe Theory.
    4. Having been born into and raised in what was then a reasonably functional democracy it has taken me most of a long lifetime to come to accept that such a thing no longer exists, and to finally throw off my innate unease at the use and the objectives of the terms ‘revolution’ and ‘revolutionary’. Now, having recently tried one last time to bring about a recovery of that old status quo via the ballot box, and having failed abysmally, I am convinced that that avenue is closed and is beyond hope of recovery. (Granting a universal franchise — without consideration as to whether or not significant a significant percentile of the recipients of this gift are set to destroy and replace that system — is simply a neglectfully altruistic way of committing mass suicide.)At the onset this painful transition of mine presented me with a moral dilemma, a dilemma which prevailing circumstances forced me to acknowledge and then resolve by finally accepting that only one alternative course of action remains open; in all a slow process through which I have had to struggle within myself, bedevilled by beguiling bucolic memories of a more harmonious and homogenous past. Yet, eventually, I came to the firm conclusion that the necessary course of action should not simply be in the form of ‘resistance’, because whilst resistance is often said to be futile, it is much more than that — it is wholly counter-productive in the sense that it only delays the inevitable chaos and thus the post-chaos opportunity for re-birth, and that the longer such an inevitability is delayed the more difficult will be the reconstruction.
    IDENTITY
    Etymologically: ‘That which makes similar.’ A people’s identity is that what makes it incomparable and irreplaceable.
    Characteristic of humanity is the diversity and singularity of its many peoples and cultures. Every form of homogenisation is synonymous with death, as well as with sclerosis and entropy. Universalism always seeks to marginalise identity in the name of a single, unique anthropological model. But ethnic and cultural identities form a block: maintaining and developing the cultural heritage presupposes a people’s ethnic commonality.
    Humanity will not survive the challenges if it remains a pluriversum, that is, if it remains a fractious aggravation of profoundly different ethnocentric peoples.
    Look: identity’s basis is biological [5] ; without it, the realms of culture and civilisation are unsustainable. Said differently: a people’s identity, memory and projects come from a specific hereditary disposition.
    Quotations:
    … “In times of indoctrinated lies and well-bred civil cowardice, the courage to tell the truth mutates into a cardinal sin.”
    … “We should also be wary of certain spiritual, metaphysical and so called ‘philosophical’ tendencies. Wary of those impostors who call themselves theologians in the confines of their office…though a spiritual renewal is absolutely necessary — for the sake of Europe’s rebirth — and against materialistic narcissism, which is the primal cause of her present tragedy…Spirituality is not spiritualism. It isn’t something to be decreed or instrumentalised like a computer program.”
    … “It is a fact: decadence is far more expensive than prosperity. The peak of absurdity is, however, that the riches acquired through the labour(s) of our people(s) serve, so to speak, as credit cards for the multi-racialist mafias. To put it another way: the victims finance the culprits, and voluntarily pay their executioners the highest salary for their march to the scaffold. Europe squanders her goods to cover the costs of her own extinction. Thus economic collapse precedes genetic ruin.”
    … “Europe is the sick man of the world. It’s obvious in her demographic decline, in her physiological deviralisation and in the reigning ideology of ethnomasochism, imposed by politically correct censors and the controlled media. We are gnawed at from within and attacked from without. We are set upon by assailants, occupiers and collaborators, who make up the majority of the political, media and intellectual classes, whether of the Right or the Left. The people have yet to see it because their shopping carts are still full. And although everyone may suspect that the war has begun, the majority denies it, because for the moment no one has the courage to fight it. For the moment…”
    … [“Two things only the people anxiously desire — bread and circuses (panis et circenses).”
    — The Roman satirist Juvenal commenting on the declining heroism of Romans after the Roman Republic ceased to exist and the Roman Empire began.]
    5. I am of the opinion that when the established and well-proven moral and genetic value of the traditional heterosexual family structure is superseded by institutionalised deviance, when such deviance becomes the norm and the norm becomes deviance, then the biological basis of our identity, culture and civilisation will no longer exist.
    ALIENS
    Within a given population, those who are culturally and biologically of non-indigenous origin.
    Today it would be better to talk of aliens (allogénes) than of immigrants born in Europe of non-European parents, insofar as the majority of them are not ethnically European, but are considered ‘nationals’ solely on the basis of jus soli. [6] Since Antiquity, as Aristotle, Thucydides and Xenophon noted, it’s been known that every nation that takes in large numbers of aliens is destined to perish, for these aliens progressively replace natives, who are culturally and/or physically destroyed by them. Such a process is underway now in France. [7]
    At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the notion of alien has lost all currency in Europe, either legally, linguistically or nationally.The law, though, should designate every resident not of European origin as an alien. A Belgian, Italian or Russian of European origins residing in France is not an alien. The key point is that a people submerged by aliens eventually become a minority, strangers in their own land. Such is the logic of the colonisation we’re now experiencing. In the end, the alien becomes the native. [8]
    Quotations:
    … “Faye believes a real flesh and blood enemy — un corps étranger et parisitaire — mortally imperils Europe: the replacement populations gathered under the Prophet’s banner.
    … “In colonising European lands and replacing her native peoples, they have in fact, already begun turning Europe into a Dar-al-Islam — which is eventually going to turn her into an anti-Europe.”
    … “Their mechanism is simple: they mount a phony opposition to the system, attacking superficial aspects of it, but never challenge its foundation.”
    6. Fr. ‘birthright citizenship’
    7. And everywhere else in the Euro/Anglosphere.
    8. History amply demonstrates that once Muslims are given democratic rights and authority within a territory they are in the process of occupying they will use those rights and that authority to gradually abrogate the rights and authority of the original inhabitants. Thus when it’s in an absolute minority Islam will incessantly demand more and more minority rights. When it becomes a significant minority the pace and intensity of its demands will accelerate exponentially. Then, once Islam becomes a majority within any socio-political or geographic environment, at local, national or continental level, or it finds itself close to becoming one, there will be no more minority rights — for anyone. That is when the original inhabitants will cease to exist.
    LIBERTY
    An individual’s or a people’s capacity to act according to their own will — a capacity gained by discipline and founded on the multiplication of competence and freedom.
    The ‘free’ man has long been a model for European society,in opposition to the barbarians and slaves of Greek thought. Today the concept of ‘liberty’ has suffered a veritable inversion of meaning, as has the term ‘democracy’. Liberty nowadays signifies what was once called ‘slavery’, since it’s confused with permissivenessthat leads to certain types of servitude. In contrast, real liberty is the faculty of augmenting one’s power, of multiplying one’s capacity to affect the real, and, through autonomy, of overcoming determinism. This conception opposes individualistic egalitarian notions of liberty — conceived as forms of passive licence or theabsence of constraints. The slavery — that comes from the dominant ready-to-think ideology and prevents the people and its defenders from openly expressing their convictions and demands — is enforced by a thought police, an obligatory xenophilia[9], the interdiction of direct democracy, and the power of judges.
    Quotations:
    … “The threats facing Europe…(itemised)…are prudently ignored by these fake resisters (our ruling classes – S III) who lack any geopolitical, strategic, economic, ethnic or cultural vision of resistance…The principle enemy, everywhere known, isn’t even mentioned. (“It has nothing to do with Islam.”? — S III)
    … “There’s another danger, the inverse of these [the above]: a nostalgic, pessimistic discourse steeped in sectarianism and impotence, marginality and inept resistance. This is the logic of history’s eternal losers, vanquished in advance, embittered and discouraged, seeing themselves as the last line of defence rather than the first. Every resistance not arising on a foundation of re-conquest is destined to fail.
    9. The epithet ‘Islamophobia’ is thus a subliminally self-defining reflection of the user’s induced or cynically opportunistic ‘Islamophilia’.
    MASS — massification
    The transformation of a people into a mass of undifferentiated, uniform individuals.[10]
    It comes with modern egalitarianism. ‘The masses’: this concept shared by both Marxism and capitalism is alien to every organic notion of an ethnically-created people. Massification implies cultural uniformity and race mixing (métissage), consumerism and the cult of commodities. The ‘atomised masses’ oppose both the free individual and the people as an organic ensemble organised in communal hierarchies. This enterprise of massification and homogenisation has, however, failed everywhere, except unfortunately amongst native Europeans, who have been emasculated by it. But despite its will to ‘reduce everything to the same’, despite socio-economic standardisation, egalitarian market society has failed to neutralise ethnic nationalism or the resurgence of identities.
    Quotations:
    … “Sterile disputes and sectarian divisions divide and neutralise those who ought to be in solidarity with one another. This contrasts with the enemy, who, however protean, knows how to close ranks.”
    …”Contrary to the suicidal opinions held by the sorcerer’s apprentices of the multi-racial heresies, the analysis made by all experts on immigration, demographics and economics are symptomatic of an ever widening gulf opening up between the clear vision of pragmatic scientists and the dementia of the dysfunctional political class.”
    10 See Note 1 and, to a lesser extent, Note 5above.
    ARCHEOFUTURISM
    The attitude that approaches the future in terms of ancestral values, believing that notions of modernism and traditionalism need to be dialectically transcended.
    Archeofuturism opposes both modernity and conservatism seeing them a versos of one another and believing that modernity is backward looking having failed to realise either its ideals or great projects. Techno-science, for example, is incompatible with humanity’s humanitarian and egalitarian values. The Twenty-first century will see the resurgence of struggles that bourgeois and Western cosmopolitan ideology thought it had long buried; identitarian, traditionalist and religious conflicts; geopolitical fissures; ethnic questions posed at the planetary level; battles over scarce resources.
    On the rear cover of the book it was suggested, either by the publishers or an editor, that “As it was for the nineteenth-century Left with Marx’s Communist Manifesto, Why We Fight is destined to become the key work for twenty-first century Identitarians.” If so, then these will indeed be the times that try men’s souls. How we respond individually and collectively will determine the course of our future. And that of our descendants.
    Conclusion
    I am now of the opinion that there is no longer any hope of finding a safe middle passage through the two perfect storms of the coming dénouement, our ruling classes and Islam; it’s a simple case of being caught between Scylla and Charybdis, and so one or the other, or probably both, will have to be neutralised. We, the Europeans, exist and they, the Slaves of Allah, exist, each in a state of total moral, cultural, intellectual and ideological incompatibility with the other. Furthermore, the current elites throughout the West have taken their position and cannot compromise nor turn back now in any way, for they have taken it too far. They know that for them to even take one short step down that road would be to expose their deconstructionist position in its totality and fatally shift the sand beneath their hideous treason, followed by the swift exsanguination of them and all of their ambitions.
    We, then, the indigenous peoples of the Western Ecumene, must do this thing ourselves, without them, without mercy, hesitation or magnanimity. And do it now before we are demographically outnumbered and beaten into total subjugation or extermination.
    As was the Restoration of Rome[11] effected by what became to be seen by some as Barbarian Popes and Imperial Contenders, so may we be viewed. But no matter — if we prevail we will be the ones who set the future course. History and those who triumph to write it always define the prevailing moral philosophy and, in the final analysis, it is an immutable reality that evolution is simply the end product of survival of the fittest. Those survivors, whoever they are, will be the heirs to the future.
    11. The Restoration of Rome — Barbarian Popes and Imperial Pretenders, by Peter Heather, Macmillan, 2013.
    Afterthought — a personal philosophy:
    “The coming century will be a century of iron. It will bring about an archeofuturist return of ancient questions, of eternal disputes, after the short parenthesis of ‘modernity’, which lasted barely three centuries — a moment in history’s course. The coming age announces the titanic and the tragic — as an overcrowded humanity, crammed on a sick planet, engages its decisive struggle for survival.
    End of a regime and interregnum.” (Faye, Preliminary Elements)
    I can think of no better path for a man or a woman to tread than to join together, one with the other, within the bosom of their own culture and community in order to love, care, support and protect their union, by any means at their disposal no matter how demanding, and to beget and do the same for their children so that their vigorous genetic inheritance is passed on and carries forward into the future. That really is immortality, and it has nothing to do with Islam or virgins, no matter the numerical quantity the latter are presumed to be found. Moreover, whilst Muslims do so conjoin similarly, even though often in multiplicands of our predilection for singularity in this area of human relationships, one factor determines their fundamental weakness rather than their strength.
    To our everlasting advantage Islam’s fourteen centuries of a closed, genetically damaging, tribally driven consanguineous reproduction system (other than the unfortunate offspring of its rape Jihad) is, in the final analysis, its own nemesis. Throughout human history, and that of the animal world, such a primitive imperative always translates into a terminal state of negative hybrid vigour, a cul-de-sac, the epitome of evolutionary regression rather than progression. And this, in a nutshell, is Islam, the culture we are now beset and belaboured with, one gifted to us in the West by a morally corrupt, venal cabal of acquisitive predators — our own governing classes and their indoctrinated media and executive arms.
    Yet the universe continues on its course. Islam persists in indulging itself in its painful and grotesque death throes, in its recent but far from historically unique barbaric manifestations — frenzied orgasms of rape, atrocity, death and destruction — through which it chooses to express its hopes of a continued existence and ultimate dominance. Islam knows no better, nor ever will.
    If we are to survive this tsunami of primitivism we must take hold of this, our small advantage, and cease treating these cretinous by-products of a failed system as if they were of us; they are not. They and their enablers are immune to reason because they exist in a different space-time continuum, a dark place from which two sets of similar doctrinal chains permit no escape. And, no, there are no such things as moderate Muslims, there are only Muslims and possibly an undefined cadre of apostates who dare not declare for fear of their lives.
    We must pity the latter, of course, for we cannot retreat from all of our humanity, only that percentile which we must abstain from in order to ensure our own survival. Yet nor can we save them at this point in time: we do not have the resources to spare, for everything we do have must be deployed in the cause of our own survival. Then, and only then, that objective achieved, would we dare risk whatever we have left and invest it in their salvation.
    And, finally, I ask all of you of Euro-ethnicity to try to accept this demanding necessity: above all things we must prevail, whatever the gruesome cost of the attempt, because the price of failure will be much higher and will have to be paid not by us, but by our descendants — if any.
    Sadly, that is the way of it. Islam permits us no other course of action. It cannot, for if it did then it would no longer be Islam.
    — Seneca III, Middle England, 23rd July, 2015.
    For links to previous essays by Seneca III, see the Seneca III Archives.

    This entry was posted in Books, Civil Liberties, Counterjihad, Culture Wars, Enric
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism

    Posted on July 25, 2015 by Baron Bodissey
    The latest essay by our English correspondent Seneca III is a study of the works of the French writer Guillaume Faye.
    To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism
    by Seneca III
    Preamble
    “Are these the last days of Europe?”
    — Walter Laqueur, from The Last Days of Europe: Epitaph for an Old Continent, New York St. Martin’s Griffin, 2009.
    This series of three essays explores the ongoing destruction of the West, of the origins of this debacle and of its enablers, both the deliberately misinformed and the malignant peddlers of Euro-ethnic cleansing. It also looks into a deeply perplexing future, mainly through the eyes and thought processes of one particular philosopher and political scientist, the French scholar Guillaume Faye.
    With a doctorate in Political Science from the Institute of Political Science in Paris, Professor Faye was one of the principal theoreticians of the French ‘Nouvelle Droit’ in the 1970s and ’80s, prior to his developing an empathy with the Identitarian movement. He has also been a journalist at Figaro-Magazine,Paris-Match, Charlie Hebdo and Valeurs Actuelles.
    Faye became known as the enfant terrible of the Nouvelle Droit. In 2000 he was sentenced to a heavy fine by a French court for his book ‘The Colonisation of Europe: True Discourse Against Immigration and Islam (L’Aencre). It was this action that first drew my attention. I have long held that anyone who brings down the wrath of the proponents of a proto-tyranny upon his or her shoulders is or has been presenting an idea or suggesting a course of action that is perceived as an existential threat to such totalitarian, monotheistic entities and their enforcement apparatchiks, and has hit the nail right on the head.
    In essence such reactions are the typically Pavlovian responses to any ethnic, political or intellectually critical examination of an extant regime, and are an early sign of its desperation, a precursor to the full draconian reaction that will follow as the inevitable demise of its gratuitous construct begins. (A recent UK example of this is the British Establishment’s ridiculing, demonization and then what was, effectively, the elimination of the English Defence League — albeit a flawed and poorly-led organisation, but nonetheless one with a justifiable ethno-cultural raison d’être.)
    Of his many books and publications three of Faye’s most seminal contributions to the dialectic are available in English language editions: ‘Why We Fight’ [A], ‘Convergence of Catastrophes’ [B] and ‘Archeofuturism’ [C]. The seven abstracts below from ‘Why We Fight’ are from his METAPOLITICAL DICTIONARY (187 entries in all) which constitutes its main thrust, although I would describe it as more of an encyclopaedia than a dictionary.
    In the two short chapters following the FOREWORD and PREFACE, PRELIMINARY ELEMENTS and STRATEGIC PRINCIPLES, Faye deals with what he describes as ‘The Logic of Decline’, ‘Economic Principles’, ‘Islam Against Europe’, ‘The Dangers of European Disarmament’, ‘The Menace From the South’ and ‘Towards a Eurosiberian Strategic Doctrine’. A few short quotations from the Forward, Preface, Elements and Strategic Principles are interspersed throughout this essay with the intention of giving the reader a general flavour of those arguments as contained in the more substantialAbstracts.
    Also from the Metapolitical Dictionary I have abstracted in Part I the definition of Archeofuturism, but I have left it without comment or elaboration as it is a complex proposition that begs a detailed analysis. WhilstPart II of the series will look at Convergence of Catastrophes, Part IIIwill return to an examination of Archeofuturism — European Visions of the Post-catastrophic Age.
    A . Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance by Guillaume Faye. Arktos Media Ltd (2011), ISBN-10: 1907166181 (Paperback) [N.B. This English language edition is a translation from the German. It first appeared, in French in 2001 and then the German edition in 2006, and hence it does in places show its age.]
    B. Convergence of Catastrophes by Guillaume Faye. Arktos Media Ltd (2012), ISBN-10:1907166467 (Paperback).
    C. Archeofuturism: European Visions of the Post-Catastrophic Age byGuillaume Faye (Author), Michael O’Meara (Foreword). Arktos Media Ltd (2010), ISBN-10: 1907166092. (Paperback)
    Part I — Why We Fight: Manifesto of the European Resistance
    In view of the recent destruction — or predominantly self-destruction — of Greece as an independent sovereign State, and in order to understand the inevitable destiny of fundamentally flawed socio-political engineering experiments implemented by hubristic power seekers, one has only to observe this event and the further slow, painful disintegration of the European Union.
    Furthermore, on an even more disastrous scale, from Malmö to Chattanooga, from Rotherham to Madrid, from Boston to London to Paris to New York and to all points of the Western compass, a bloody tide of barbarism surges, seemingly free to do as it wills, and it is well on course to impose such destruction likewise throughout the whole of the Euro/Anglosphere.
    In order to appreciate how this has come about we have to ask why those not of Islam but who enable its predatory advance either wilfully ignore or deny the old axiom that “a house built on sand will eventually collapse”, and its logical extension “a house built on quicksand will quickly disappear”. Should they not consider the reality that they will neither survive nor leave anything of substance whosoever triumphs in the conflict they have brought upon us, for when such a house collapses or disappears, into the vacuum so created there comes some form of chaos, its magnitude being directly proportional to the size and duration of their calamitous building project?
    Many philosophers and political scientists, from the early Greeks on through the Enlightenment and beyond to the present day have attempted to dissect the causes of catastrophe and the subsequent chaos into which it leads. Mathematical treatments of Chaos Theory are well established, and this is not surprising in light of the fact that philosophy is at root as much a mathematical discipline as it is metaphysical, for it utilises symbolic logic in the form of both quantitative and qualitative comparative analysis of cause and effect in order to reach its conclusions. What methodology Faye employs in his work is not explained in the books so we can only speculate. However, George Boole, who first introduced the concept of Boolean Algebra (The mathematical Analysis of Logic, 1847 and An Investigation of the Laws of Thought, 1854) predicated his theses upon the idea that variables could be represented as the values ‘true’ and ‘false’ by the use of the operators ‘AND’, ‘OR’, ‘NOT’, thus combining simple propositions into compound propositions, and was himself first and foremost a philosopher.
    Abstracts and Quotations
    (All bolds in block quotes are Faye’s or his editors’. Quotations in square brackets are from other sources. Footnotes and comments in italics are mine.)
    ETHNIC CHAOS
    A historical situation in which a people or civilisation loses its ethnic basis due to the mass immigration of aliens.
    Ethnic chaos was a factor in the decomposition of the Roman Republic and Empire, Pharaonic-Egyptian civilisation and many ancient Greek cities. Europe is presently in the grip of a colonising settlement by overseas peoples. A civilisation disappears once it loses its original ethnic basis. It becomes a patchwork quilt in which any idea of a city, community and destiny is impossible.
    Ethnic chaos signals the pure and simple disappearance of a people and a civilisation — and of true democracy — as all of the classical Greek philosophers warned.
    An ethnically heterogeneous population — a kaleidoscope of communities — becomes an anonymous society, without soul, without solidarity, prone to incessant conflicts for domination, to an endemic racism (‘every multi-racial society is a multi-racist society’) — ungovernable because there’s no shared vision of the world. Ethnic chaos is an open door to tyranny.
    In the name of multi-racialism, capitalism and democracy have made ethnic chaos part of their programme. Men are stripped of their attachments and remade as consumers, each interchangeable with the other, each without an identity.[1] But this is stupid. Man never actually loses his memory or ancestral identity. A society of ethnic chaos leads in the long run not to prosperity, harmonious individualism or republican rule, but to political and social disorder. We’re now catching the first glimpses of this chaos. From it there will perhaps come the post-chaos — that is regeneration — a return to homogeneity.
    Quotations:

    “The history of the world is a history of the struggle between peoples and civilisations for survival and domination. It’s a battleground of wills to power… the base of everything is biocultural identity.”
    … “Let us remember that Socrates was a Hoplite and Xenophon a military magistrate.”
    …[‘Apart from material gain I have two purposes. First, by expanding our territory to make Mycenae Achaea’s paramount power. Second, to close the coast to seaborne Dorians infiltrating across the Gulf. The Wall already bars their passage across the Isthmus.’
    ‘They are crossing in numbers, sire?’ Bunus inquired.
    The movement,’ said Atreus grimly, ‘has attained the proportions of a mass immigration. They land and take to the mountains where they reinforce the Goatmen. If we don’t stop it we’ll become embroiled in a ceaseless war of attrition. And not Mycenae alone, every civilised city will suffer.’
    Heroes shook doubtful heads. Some smiled behind their hands. Goatmen raids and counter-raids had become a way of life, a repetitive military exercise to keep warriors on their toes, a salutary irritant like blistering a horse. None conceived them a major menace. Atreus’ far-seeing vision proved everybody wrong.
    — From the novel ‘Warrior in Bronze’ by George Shipway, Peter Davis Ltd., 1977.]
    1. The destruction of personal identity is the singular, most important step, the sine qua non, imposed by a self-selected few, the new post-war ruling elite, who use their grip on the levers of power to dominate and direct human affairs in their own ambitious and pecuniary interests. By reducing all down to the level of the lowest common denominator they intend to create a passive population, or one otherwise perpetually occupied in low-level ethnic conflict, and thus create an easily controllable Global Slave State or, by another definition, The New World Order.
    POST-CHAOS
    Chaos is that state of disorganisation and anarchy affecting a collectivity of any sort once it’s beset by catastrophe. The post chaos is that phase when a new order is constructed on the basis of a revolutionary metamorphic logic. It’s the eternal cycle of life, death and rebirth as expressed in Nietzsche’s theory of the eternal return of the identical [2] as well as in René Thom’s [3]theory of catastrophes. The society we know can’t be fixed, the system can’t be saved. This is the illusion of every conservative tendency. The sole solution to the present situation will come from chaos — from civil war, economic depression etc. — that overthrows established mentalities and makes acceptable and indispensable that which was previously unimaginable. Only in situations of chaos are the given variables changed and does it become possible to establish another order — the post-chaos. Only in crisis, then, will a solution be found [4]. To construct a new home, it’s first necessary that the old one collapses. It’s not a pessimist but a realist who sees this.
    Quotations:
    …“We need, in a word, to be alert to demobilising mysticisms, to a pretentious but hollow intellectualism, to easy refuge in spirituality or philosophy whose attitudes, postures and loopholes are ultimately tangential to the resistance.”
    … “Distrust is no less warranted in respect to that artificial and instrumentalised ‘paganism’ that threatens to succumb to either a new age disconnected from any worldly struggle, or worse, in the name of a badly understood polytheism, to Xenophilia, and a catastrophic ‘Love of the Other’”.
    … “Granted the ‘system’ still holds all the political cards…we have nothing but our ideas, our convictions and our will — certainly not much, compared to the usurpers of power who daily confuse minds, poison souls and take all imaginable measures to initiate the destruction of all identities…We possess, however, the highest trump — the trump of trumps which those who are attempting to erase all traces of their own blood do not possess and can never possess. We know where we are going because we know where we came from. We possess the memory of the history that is also the memory of the ‘mythos’ of our ‘ethnos’, the consciousness of an unbroken line of ancestors from whom we have inherited the most valuable of all privileges: namely the privilege to be like them.”
    2. Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Cambridge University Press (2001), pp. 194. This is one of Nietzsche’s central propositions.
    3. René Frédéric Thom (1923-2002) was a renowned French mathematician. He was principally a topologist and singularity theorist (and winner of the Fields’ Medal) but later moved on to become the founder of Catastrophe Theory.
    4. Having been born into and raised in what was then a reasonably functional democracy it has taken me most of a long lifetime to come to accept that such a thing no longer exists, and to finally throw off my innate unease at the use and the objectives of the terms ‘revolution’ and ‘revolutionary’. Now, having recently tried one last time to bring about a recovery of that old status quo via the ballot box, and having failed abysmally, I am convinced that that avenue is closed and is beyond hope of recovery. (Granting a universal franchise — without consideration as to whether or not significant a significant percentile of the recipients of this gift are set to destroy and replace that system — is simply a neglectfully altruistic way of committing mass suicide.)At the onset this painful transition of mine presented me with a moral dilemma, a dilemma which prevailing circumstances forced me to acknowledge and then resolve by finally accepting that only one alternative course of action remains open; in all a slow process through which I have had to struggle within myself, bedevilled by beguiling bucolic memories of a more harmonious and homogenous past. Yet, eventually, I came to the firm conclusion that the necessary course of action should not simply be in the form of ‘resistance’, because whilst resistance is often said to be futile, it is much more than that — it is wholly counter-productive in the sense that it only delays the inevitable chaos and thus the post-chaos opportunity for re-birth, and that the longer such an inevitability is delayed the more difficult will be the reconstruction.
    IDENTITY
    Etymologically: ‘That which makes similar.’ A people’s identity is that what makes it incomparable and irreplaceable.
    Characteristic of humanity is the diversity and singularity of its many peoples and cultures. Every form of homogenisation is synonymous with death, as well as with sclerosis and entropy. Universalism always seeks to marginalise identity in the name of a single, unique anthropological model. But ethnic and cultural identities form a block: maintaining and developing the cultural heritage presupposes a people’s ethnic commonality.
    Humanity will not survive the challenges if it remains a pluriversum, that is, if it remains a fractious aggravation of profoundly different ethnocentric peoples.
    Look: identity’s basis is biological [5] ; without it, the realms of culture and civilisation are unsustainable. Said differently: a people’s identity, memory and projects come from a specific hereditary disposition.
    Quotations:
    … “In times of indoctrinated lies and well-bred civil cowardice, the courage to tell the truth mutates into a cardinal sin.”
    … “We should also be wary of certain spiritual, metaphysical and so called ‘philosophical’ tendencies. Wary of those impostors who call themselves theologians in the confines of their office…though a spiritual renewal is absolutely necessary — for the sake of Europe’s rebirth — and against materialistic narcissism, which is the primal cause of her present tragedy…Spirituality is not spiritualism. It isn’t something to be decreed or instrumentalised like a computer program.”
    … “It is a fact: decadence is far more expensive than prosperity. The peak of absurdity is, however, that the riches acquired through the labour(s) of our people(s) serve, so to speak, as credit cards for the multi-racialist mafias. To put it another way: the victims finance the culprits, and voluntarily pay their executioners the highest salary for their march to the scaffold. Europe squanders her goods to cover the costs of her own extinction. Thus economic collapse precedes genetic ruin.”
    … “Europe is the sick man of the world. It’s obvious in her demographic decline, in her physiological deviralisation and in the reigning ideology of ethnomasochism, imposed by politically correct censors and the controlled media. We are gnawed at from within and attacked from without. We are set upon by assailants, occupiers and collaborators, who make up the majority of the political, media and intellectual classes, whether of the Right or the Left. The people have yet to see it because their shopping carts are still full. And although everyone may suspect that the war has begun, the majority denies it, because for the moment no one has the courage to fight it. For the moment…”
    … [“Two things only the people anxiously desire — bread and circuses (panis et circenses).”
    — The Roman satirist Juvenal commenting on the declining heroism of Romans after the Roman Republic ceased to exist and the Roman Empire began.]
    5. I am of the opinion that when the established and well-proven moral and genetic value of the traditional heterosexual family structure is superseded by institutionalised deviance, when such deviance becomes the norm and the norm becomes deviance, then the biological basis of our identity, culture and civilisation will no longer exist.
    ALIENS
    Within a given population, those who are culturally and biologically of non-indigenous origin.
    Today it would be better to talk of aliens (allogénes) than of immigrants born in Europe of non-European parents, insofar as the majority of them are not ethnically European, but are considered ‘nationals’ solely on the basis of jus soli. [6] Since Antiquity, as Aristotle, Thucydides and Xenophon noted, it’s been known that every nation that takes in large numbers of aliens is destined to perish, for these aliens progressively replace natives, who are culturally and/or physically destroyed by them. Such a process is underway now in France. [7]
    At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the notion of alien has lost all currency in Europe, either legally, linguistically or nationally.The law, though, should designate every resident not of European origin as an alien. A Belgian, Italian or Russian of European origins residing in France is not an alien. The key point is that a people submerged by aliens eventually become a minority, strangers in their own land. Such is the logic of the colonisation we’re now experiencing. In the end, the alien becomes the native. [8]
    Quotations:
    … “Faye believes a real flesh and blood enemy — un corps étranger et parisitaire — mortally imperils Europe: the replacement populations gathered under the Prophet’s banner.
    … “In colonising European lands and replacing her native peoples, they have in fact, already begun turning Europe into a Dar-al-Islam — which is eventually going to turn her into an anti-Europe.”
    … “Their mechanism is simple: they mount a phony opposition to the system, attacking superficial aspects of it, but never challenge its foundation.”
    6. Fr. ‘birthright citizenship’
    7. And everywhere else in the Euro/Anglosphere.
    8. History amply demonstrates that once Muslims are given democratic rights and authority within a territory they are in the process of occupying they will use those rights and that authority to gradually abrogate the rights and authority of the original inhabitants. Thus when it’s in an absolute minority Islam will incessantly demand more and more minority rights. When it becomes a significant minority the pace and intensity of its demands will accelerate exponentially. Then, once Islam becomes a majority within any socio-political or geographic environment, at local, national or continental level, or it finds itself close to becoming one, there will be no more minority rights — for anyone. That is when the original inhabitants will cease to exist.
    LIBERTY
    An individual’s or a people’s capacity to act according to their own will — a capacity gained by discipline and founded on the multiplication of competence and freedom.
    The ‘free’ man has long been a model for European society,in opposition to the barbarians and slaves of Greek thought. Today the concept of ‘liberty’ has suffered a veritable inversion of meaning, as has the term ‘democracy’. Liberty nowadays signifies what was once called ‘slavery’, since it’s confused with permissivenessthat leads to certain types of servitude. In contrast, real liberty is the faculty of augmenting one’s power, of multiplying one’s capacity to affect the real, and, through autonomy, of overcoming determinism. This conception opposes individualistic egalitarian notions of liberty — conceived as forms of passive licence or theabsence of constraints. The slavery — that comes from the dominant ready-to-think ideology and prevents the people and its defenders from openly expressing their convictions and demands — is enforced by a thought police, an obligatory xenophilia[9], the interdiction of direct democracy, and the power of judges.
    Quotations:
    … “The threats facing Europe…(itemised)…are prudently ignored by these fake resisters (our ruling classes – S III) who lack any geopolitical, strategic, economic, ethnic or cultural vision of resistance…The principle enemy, everywhere known, isn’t even mentioned. (“It has nothing to do with Islam.”? — S III)
    … “There’s another danger, the inverse of these [the above]: a nostalgic, pessimistic discourse steeped in sectarianism and impotence, marginality and inept resistance. This is the logic of history’s eternal losers, vanquished in advance, embittered and discouraged, seeing themselves as the last line of defence rather than the first. Every resistance not arising on a foundation of re-conquest is destined to fail.
    9. The epithet ‘Islamophobia’ is thus a subliminally self-defining reflection of the user’s induced or cynically opportunistic ‘Islamophilia’.
    MASS — massification
    The transformation of a people into a mass of undifferentiated, uniform individuals.[10]
    It comes with modern egalitarianism. ‘The masses’: this concept shared by both Marxism and capitalism is alien to every organic notion of an ethnically-created people. Massification implies cultural uniformity and race mixing (métissage), consumerism and the cult of commodities. The ‘atomised masses’ oppose both the free individual and the people as an organic ensemble organised in communal hierarchies. This enterprise of massification and homogenisation has, however, failed everywhere, except unfortunately amongst native Europeans, who have been emasculated by it. But despite its will to ‘reduce everything to the same’, despite socio-economic standardisation, egalitarian market society has failed to neutralise ethnic nationalism or the resurgence of identities.
    Quotations:
    … “Sterile disputes and sectarian divisions divide and neutralise those who ought to be in solidarity with one another. This contrasts with the enemy, who, however protean, knows how to close ranks.”
    …”Contrary to the suicidal opinions held by the sorcerer’s apprentices of the multi-racial heresies, the analysis made by all experts on immigration, demographics and economics are symptomatic of an ever widening gulf opening up between the clear vision of pragmatic scientists and the dementia of the dysfunctional political class.”
    10 See Note 1 and, to a lesser extent, Note 5above.
    ARCHEOFUTURISM
    The attitude that approaches the future in terms of ancestral values, believing that notions of modernism and traditionalism need to be dialectically transcended.
    Archeofuturism opposes both modernity and conservatism seeing them a versos of one another and believing that modernity is backward looking having failed to realise either its ideals or great projects. Techno-science, for example, is incompatible with humanity’s humanitarian and egalitarian values. The Twenty-first century will see the resurgence of struggles that bourgeois and Western cosmopolitan ideology thought it had long buried; identitarian, traditionalist and religious conflicts; geopolitical fissures; ethnic questions posed at the planetary level; battles over scarce resources.
    On the rear cover of the book it was suggested, either by the publishers or an editor, that “As it was for the nineteenth-century Left with Marx’s Communist Manifesto, Why We Fight is destined to become the key work for twenty-first century Identitarians.” If so, then these will indeed be the times that try men’s souls. How we respond individually and collectively will determine the course of our future. And that of our descendants.
    Conclusion
    I am now of the opinion that there is no longer any hope of finding a safe middle passage through the two perfect storms of the coming dénouement, our ruling classes and Islam; it’s a simple case of being caught between Scylla and Charybdis, and so one or the other, or probably both, will have to be neutralised. We, the Europeans, exist and they, the Slaves of Allah, exist, each in a state of total moral, cultural, intellectual and ideological incompatibility with the other. Furthermore, the current elites throughout the West have taken their position and cannot compromise nor turn back now in any way, for they have taken it too far. They know that for them to even take one short step down that road would be to expose their deconstructionist position in its totality and fatally shift the sand beneath their hideous treason, followed by the swift exsanguination of them and all of their ambitions.
    We, then, the indigenous peoples of the Western Ecumene, must do this thing ourselves, without them, without mercy, hesitation or magnanimity. And do it now before we are demographically outnumbered and beaten into total subjugation or extermination.
    As was the Restoration of Rome[11] effected by what became to be seen by some as Barbarian Popes and Imperial Contenders, so may we be viewed. But no matter — if we prevail we will be the ones who set the future course. History and those who triumph to write it always define the prevailing moral philosophy and, in the final analysis, it is an immutable reality that evolution is simply the end product of survival of the fittest. Those survivors, whoever they are, will be the heirs to the future.
    11. The Restoration of Rome — Barbarian Popes and Imperial Pretenders, by Peter Heather, Macmillan, 2013.
    Afterthought — a personal philosophy:
    “The coming century will be a century of iron. It will bring about an archeofuturist return of ancient questions, of eternal disputes, after the short parenthesis of ‘modernity’, which lasted barely three centuries — a moment in history’s course. The coming age announces the titanic and the tragic — as an overcrowded humanity, crammed on a sick planet, engages its decisive struggle for survival.
    End of a regime and interregnum.” (Faye, Preliminary Elements)
    I can think of no better path for a man or a woman to tread than to join together, one with the other, within the bosom of their own culture and community in order to love, care, support and protect their union, by any means at their disposal no matter how demanding, and to beget and do the same for their children so that their vigorous genetic inheritance is passed on and carries forward into the future. That really is immortality, and it has nothing to do with Islam or virgins, no matter the numerical quantity the latter are presumed to be found. Moreover, whilst Muslims do so conjoin similarly, even though often in multiplicands of our predilection for singularity in this area of human relationships, one factor determines their fundamental weakness rather than their strength.
    To our everlasting advantage Islam’s fourteen centuries of a closed, genetically damaging, tribally driven consanguineous reproduction system (other than the unfortunate offspring of its rape Jihad) is, in the final analysis, its own nemesis. Throughout human history, and that of the animal world, such a primitive imperative always translates into a terminal state of negative hybrid vigour, a cul-de-sac, the epitome of evolutionary regression rather than progression. And this, in a nutshell, is Islam, the culture we are now beset and belaboured with, one gifted to us in the West by a morally corrupt, venal cabal of acquisitive predators — our own governing classes and their indoctrinated media and executive arms.
    Yet the universe continues on its course. Islam persists in indulging itself in its painful and grotesque death throes, in its recent but far from historically unique barbaric manifestations — frenzied orgasms of rape, atrocity, death and destruction — through which it chooses to express its hopes of a continued existence and ultimate dominance. Islam knows no better, nor ever will.
    If we are to survive this tsunami of primitivism we must take hold of this, our small advantage, and cease treating these cretinous by-products of a failed system as if they were of us; they are not. They and their enablers are immune to reason because they exist in a different space-time continuum, a dark place from which two sets of similar doctrinal chains permit no escape. And, no, there are no such things as moderate Muslims, there are only Muslims and possibly an undefined cadre of apostates who dare not declare for fear of their lives.
    We must pity the latter, of course, for we cannot retreat from all of our humanity, only that percentile which we must abstain from in order to ensure our own survival. Yet nor can we save them at this point in time: we do not have the resources to spare, for everything we do have must be deployed in the cause of our own survival. Then, and only then, that objective achieved, would we dare risk whatever we have left and invest it in their salvation.
    And, finally, I ask all of you of Euro-ethnicity to try to accept this demanding necessity: above all things we must prevail, whatever the gruesome cost of the attempt, because the price of failure will be much higher and will have to be paid not by us, but by our descendants — if any.
    Sadly, that is the way of it. Islam permits us no other course of action. It cannot, for if it did then it would no longer be Islam.
    — Seneca III, Middle England, 23rd July, 2015.
    For links to previous essays by Seneca III, see the Seneca III Archives.

    This entry was posted in Books, Civil Liberties, Counterjihad, Culture Wars, Enric
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism, Part 2

    Posted on August 10, 2015 by Baron Bodissey
    Below is the second part of Seneca III’s review of the writings of Guillaume Faye. Part 1 is here.
    To Chaos and Beyond — Faye, on Fate and Futurism
    Part II — Convergence of Catastrophes
    by Seneca III
    Preamble
    “For the first time in history, humanity is threatened by a convergence of catastrophes.” is the opening line of Faye’s ‘Foreword’, and a point upon which I would beg to differ. It has happened before, at least once, as I will attempt to illustrate later in this essay and, again, in Part III, although there from a very different perspective.
    Beyond that singular line he proceeds to briefly iterate the main themes of his thesis, and does so in a far better and more lucid way than any attempt of mine could hope to match, never mind excel. Hence I have quoted a selection from his opening paragraphs below.
    Convergence of Catastrophes’ is also a slimmer volume than either ‘Why We Fight’ or ‘Archeofuturism’. The core of the book consists of just four, albeit substantial, chapters and a Conclusion, the latter being principally a review with extensive qualification of certain points or statements raised throughout the main text. Faye also touched on these themes again in the Foreword under the sub-heading ‘Believing in Miracles’.
    The chapter headings may be found beneath the Foreword.
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Clytemnestra: “Yea, the law of Zeus is, wisdom by suffering, for soberness of thought comes to men who do not wish for it. First men are emboldened by ill-counselled foolish frenzy which begins their trouble…What is to come of it, no man knows; yet it is useless to lament the issue before it comes, as come it will, clear as the light of day.”
    Aeschylus — from ‘Agamemnon’, the first in his trilogy of plays entitled the ‘Oresteia’. In Greek mythology (The Odyssey, 11.409-11) Agamemnon was the younger son of Atreus who, following his father’s death, ruled Mycenae and led the Greek forces at the Siege of Troy.
    Foreword (Faye’s)
    For the first time in history, humanity is threatened by a convergence of catastrophes.
    A series of ‘dramatic’ lines are approaching one another and converging like a river’s tributaries with perfect accord (between 2010 and 2020)[1] towards a breaking point and a descent into chaos. From this chaos — which will be extremely painful on a global scale — can emerge the new order. Let us first summarise the nature of these lines of enquiry.
    The first is the cancerisation of the European social fabric. The colonisation of the northern hemisphere for purposes of permanent settlement by peoples of the global South, which is increasingly serious despite the reassuring affirmations of the media[2], is pregnant with explosive situations: the failure of the multi-racial society, increasingly full of racism of all kinds with different communities becoming more and more tribal; the progressive ethnic and anthropological metamorphosis of Europe, a true historical cataclysm…All this indicates to us is that the European nations are heading towards a New Middle Ages.
    (Secondly — SIII) But these factors of social breakdown in Europe will be aggravated by the economic and demographic crisis which will only get worse and end by producing mass poverty… Besides these problems, the economy will increasingly resemble the Third World because of the uncontrolled immigration of unskilled populations.
    Modernity’s third dramatic line of catastrophe will be the chaos of the global South. By displacing their traditional cultures with industrialisation, the nations of the South, in spite of a deceptive and fragile economic growth, have created social chaos that is only going to get worse.
    The fourth line of catastrophe, which has recently been described by Jacques Attali[3], is the threat of a world financial crisis, which will be much more serious than the crisis of the 1930s and will bring about a general recession. The harbinger of the crisis will be the collapse of the stock markets and currencies of the Far East, like the recession that is striking this region at the present.
    The fifth line of catastrophe is the rise of fanatical religious cults, principally Islam. The rise of radical Islam is the backlash to the excesses of the cosmopolitanism of modernity that wanted to impose on the entire world the model of atheist individualism, the cult of material goods, the loss of spiritual values and the dictatorship of the spectacle. In reaction to this aggression, Islam has radicalised, just as it was already becoming once again a religion of domination and conquest, in conformity with its traditions.[4] (my bold — S III)
    The sixth line: a North-South confrontation, with theological and ethnic routes, will appear on the horizon… No one knows what form it will take, but it will be serious, because it will be based on collective challenges and sentiments much stronger than the old and artificial partisan polarity of the United States and the Soviet Union, Capitalism and Communism.
    The seventh line of catastrophe is the uncontrolled increase of pollution, which will not threaten the Earth (because the Earth still has four billion years to look forward to and can start evolution over again from zero) but the physical survival of humanity. This collapse of the environment is the fruit of the liberal and egalitarian myth (which was once also a Soviet myth) of universal industrial development and a dynamic economy for everyone.
    We can add to all this the probable implosion of the European Union, which is increasingly ungovernable, the risks involved with nuclear proliferation in the Third World, and the probability of ethnic civil war in Europe.
    The convergence of these factors in the heart of a globalised and very fragile situation allows us to predict that the Twenty-first century will not be the ‘progressive’ continuation of the contemporary world, but the rise of another world. We must prepare ourselves for this tragic possibility with lucidity.
    1. It is worth noting that this book was first published, in French, in 2004, therefore it is difficult for us, a decade later, to determine the accuracy of this time frame — or by how much it will be extended or reduced by short-lived mitigating or accelerating factors — other than by tracking and analysing events as they unfold, but I have little doubt that the proposition in general is correct, and I have chosen his time frame, roughly 2010-2020, as the basis for my conclusions.
    2. And the political classes, the chattering classes and so many of those sinecured, analytically blind peddlers of disinformation now to be found in academia polluting the fine minds of our younger generations.
    3. Jacques Attali is a French economist. His article ‘The Crash of Western Civilisation: The Limits of the Market and Democracy’ as published in the ‘American Journal of Foreign Policy’, Summer 1977 edition, is probably what Faye was referring to.
    4. To my mind ‘Radical Islam’ is just Islam with all restraints removed. It is arguable that permitting, indeed inviting it to enter, en masse, into our collective house at this point in its retrograde evolution is one of the great crimes of history.
    Chapter headings
    Chapter 1 — Toward the Collapse of the Terrestrial Ecosystem
    Chapter 2 — Toward the Clash of Civilisations
    Chapter 3 — Toward Chaos in Europe
    Chapter 4 — Toward a Giant Economic Crisis
    and Conclusion: A New Middle Ages
    Faye’s conclusion appears to be an extended analysis of and an elaboration on his prior hypotheses as briefly presented in the Foreword, and I will forego the temptation to quote from them here. However they did promote in me a faint, nagging suspicion that at this point he took a deep breath and sat back as he realised the full import of these hypotheses which, collectively, became a very viable but disturbing thesis. Perhaps this is why his Conclusion contains several detailed qualifications on points raised and statements made in the main text, and which he may have felt were open to misinterpretation; it is almost as if he had been emotionally overwhelmed as the full implications of his analysis sank in… as happened to me when I first looked into it, and as you the reader may also react — we are all human in the end; otherwise we would not have put ourselves into this position in the first place.
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Convergence has happened before — Feudalism and Plague
    Feudalism
    Even before the full onset of the turmoil of the 14th century, agriculture and animal husbandry were in a state of stasis; it was a condition that was invisible, indeed incomprehensible, to those trapped within it because of a collective inability to depart from long established traditions and the draconian social order so established, which effectively precluded them from looking beyond their immediate environs into a different future.


    At that time life was cheap and short, the average natural life span of a Serf was not much over forty years, and high infant mortality and other deaths from a variety of causes were the ordained norm. It was accepted that crops and the relatively small amount of livestock then husbanded (mainly pigs, chickens and rabbits) were inevitably subject to the vagaries of weather, of diseases and to predation by wildlife from the extensive forests which then surrounded the cleared, labour intensive fields and pastures. Medical practices had advanced little during the Middle Ages; herbicides, biocides and inorganic fertilisers were unknown, and hardship and famine were not unusual; they were simply seen as acts of God over which mere mortals had no control, leaving only the option of prayer and supplication.
    Consequently there had been little change in farming practices over the preceding millennia, in the 9,000 to 11,000 years since we made the transition from hunter gatherers to farmers and herdsmen, that seminal movement in human history which began when we first built permanent structures on or near arable land beyond the often exhausted hinterlands of our ancestor’s cave dwellings, or the temporary shelters of our other forebears, the nomadic foragers.
    Agriculture was thus trapped in a time warp where any attempt to increase food production eventuated in very little surplus because output was solely dependent upon indentured manpower and thus any increase in output would require a corresponding increase in the agricultural labour force, the Serfs. It is also possible that the overlords of the time suspected that that the Serfs, then in far larger numbers, would become, by necessity, the prime consumers of the increased production.
    Also, I would suggest, such a large and growing demographic could constitute a possible mass threat to the hierarchy of the day. This hierarchy was, effectively, a closed system established to serve the power lifestyle and indulgent privileges of the ruling classes. Consequently feudal societies were seriously lacking in cultural innovation because there was no incentive, nor obvious advantage, in allowing or promoting meaningful change or development — other than in arms and armour — provided of course that they, the ruling class, were able to maintain their personal comforts and a high enough level of manpower from which they could levy auxiliaries when needed in defence of their sinecures[5].
    5. Readers may wish to draw some parallels with much that defines our situation today, although of course not in a purely techno-scientific sense.
    Plague
    Early in the 14th century a lethal bacterium, Yersinia pestis, escaped from its ancestral breeding grounds on the High Plains of Central Asia and began a migration, a diaspora that would have fatal consequences for the rest of Asia, the Indian sub-continent, the Middle East and, finally, Europe. It would, in due course, change the direction and structure of human socio-political organisation forever (perhaps), and it has been known ever since as the ‘Black Death’ — or ‘Atra Mors & Mors Nigra’ as it was referred to in medieval texts written during the hundred or so years following its passing.
    This was a pandemic of epic proportions. It is estimated to have caused between 30-60 million deaths in Europe[6] alone (it even struck as far north as Iceland and the Eurasian sub-arctic) and far more in Asia, the Middle East and on the Indian sub-continent, although the Antipodes, Oceania and the Americas escaped infection as a result of their physical isolation far from the epicentre. Carried (vectored) by oriental rat fleas living on black rats the pestilence spread by land and sea at an unprecedented rate for its time, and arrived in the Crimea in 1343, spreading throughout Europe thereafter and peaking in the years 1346-53.
    Feudalism → x ← Black Death
    CHAOS
    Chaos
    The aftermath of this unanticipated convergence of two catastrophes, one sessile and one motile, was chaos, and it created a series of economic, religious and social upheavals, including the end of feudalism. Again it is worth noting that it was not until one hundred and fifty years later that populations managed to return to pre-Plague levels and during this time one event in England encapsulated the causes and eventual outcome of these upheavals there and throughout Europe.
    First and foremost feudalism was an economic system based upon customs and laws concerning obligations, obligations that required total obedience on the part of the Serfs and, to varying degrees, those other classes in the social strata that sat between them and their ultimate masters. However, in England after the Death, and elsewhere throughout feudal society, manpower was in very short supply, critically short, particularly in the labour intensive agricultural sector, and this is where the truism that different modes of production are the product of different circumstances made its appearance.
    …“That workers were able to imitate their superiors by demanding — and receiving — better food and drink was in no small measure due to the greatest natural catastrophe to befall the Middle Ages. The first outbreak of the great plague…
    …What is more, farming on a larger scale had become much more common, with entrepreneurial individuals building up substantial estates dedicated to animal husbandry which was less labour intensive than growing crops to eat and produced meat, hides and the all-important wool upon which so much of the nations’ wealth depended. It was no coincidence that the (late) fourteenth century saw a transformation in the diet of the English lower classes from one composed mainly of cheap cereals, beans and pulses with coarse black bread (made from Rye or Barley) and the occasional flitch of bacon to one with a high proportion of meat, particularly beef and mutton, and bread made from wheat. Though domestically brewed small beer with its low alcohol content remained a household staple, the demand for professionally brewed strong ale also increased: manorial officials at one Sussex manor in 1354 had to buy in ale to replace the cider it normally offered to its reapers because the reeve in charge ‘would not drink anything but ale in the whole of the harvest time’.”[7]
    6. Not counting subsequent deaths from starvation, armed conflict and a vulnerability to other disease caused by malnutrition. There was, however, one significant exception to the worst effects of this near mass extinction which will be explored in Part III.[Caveat: Whilst I have not gone so far as to directly categorise Islam as a pathogenic microbial in the mould of Y. pestis, there are some disturbing parallels between their respective epidemiologies: both have made several incursions into Europe and now the West in general —Y. pestis in fact in Australia (1900-20) resulting in a 1000 deaths, mostly in Sydney, and again in the form of several small outbreaks in California in more recent years. Furthermore, both organisms reproduce and spread rapidly in a receptive host environment; both are enzootic, persistent and highly infectious and both can erupt unexpectedly from deep, global reservoirs of that infection.]
    7. From “England, arise” — by Juliet Barker — Little, Brown 2014.Essentially workers, particularly agricultural workers, began to demand more rights, rewards and freedoms in return for their labours and, thanks to the Death, it was a sellers’ market. There was strong resistance of course; what was left of the ruling classes and then their successors wanted none of it. Many of the passive acts carried out by those demanding this change, together with some acts of open and bloody rebellion (The Great Revolt, aka the Peasant’s Revolt, of 1381 for example) were all bloodily suppressed, but there was slow, inexorable progress and the end result of all this was regeneration, the construction of a New Order, a new way of thinking about and organising human affairs. It was in fact the painful birth of capitalism which, in the due course of time, completely replaced feudalism. Except, that is, in the lands of the Prophet, where it exists to this day, albeit partially obscured by oil wealth.
    But, and it’s a big but, in the context our current times has not capitalism metamorphosed into neo-feudalism, a modern form of that ancien regime? Does capitalism’s global reach and domination transform us all into the new Serfs? Are we not daily beset by strident demands that we meet the obligations capitalism and its prime beneficiaries force upon us? Are we not blindly obedient to the rules of this new order without actually comprehending it is but our descent back into serfdom?
    (And, no, I am not suggesting that Communism and its cretinous spawn, Marxist-Socialism, are an option either!)
    Conclusions
    One way of looking at catastrophic events is to view them not as a matrix of singular events existing in a two-dimensional grid but as a nest of Russian Dolls, a three dimensional entity where the first and greatest encompasses the next and then on down to the final one. Hence in this analysis I am only going to examine the finished product, so to speak, but that has left me with the problem of finding a suitable starting point.
    All such momentous start points may be regarded as ‘Black Swan’ events, unforeseen happenings that appear out of nowhere. Who for example would have conceived that our governments would promote, and support a mega-influx of barbarians determined to exterminate or enslave us, their own people? Well, at least before the Satanic Verses debacle anyway. Why didn’t that ring a bell with them as it did with so many of us outside of multicultural club? Then again, perhaps it did, but to them it was the tolling of a bell they were hoping to hear because they believed it heralded the coming of the final stage of their grotesque globalisation project.
    Whatever… Looking at the underlying chronology of Faye’s predictions it would appear that he indirectly places the beginning of this progression at the start of what he describes as the onset of ‘modernity’— somewhere within that period encompassing the ‘Age of Enlightenment’, which includes the Renaissance, and which commenced in the late 14th century and effectively concluded in the mid-18th. Since then however there have been many significant events that could also serve as starting points — natural disasters, great movements of peoples, huge ideological shifts and wars in Europe and elsewhere and, in the last century, two global conflicts and their aftermaths. However for me to start anywhere beyond the recent would, I’m afraid, be a major task and any dissertation resultant therefrom would go far beyond the finite restraints of one short essay. So, for the purposes of illustration only, I have chosen to select as my starting point the global financial crash of 2008.
    The 80/20 hypothesis.
    Some students of Chaos Theory use a ‘power law’ to describe the catastrophic events preceding chaos, charting the shape of its progress from convergence onward. Essentially this hypothesis proposes that 20% of the downward descent takes place during the first 80% of its timeline, and the balance of 80% accelerates through the last 20% to conclusion — in the end it all happens very quickly. Today, because of global population density and an almost instantaneous ‘knock on’ effect enabled by modern communication systems and modern weaponry, the final stages of the descent will be a tumultuous ride…
    Global Financial Crisis → x ← Islam/mass immigration
    CHAOS
    …and I have come to believe that we in Europe and the West now need to look very closely at the turning point in the graph of the (inverse) Pareto distribution (aka the 80/20 power law) below. By my analysis, for what it’s worth, from that turning point on we will have roughly two years to the end of days.
    Finally, based on the above model, and assuming it is correct, we should not be surprised if the turning point, another Black Swan event, occurs during the last three months of this year or the first three of next.
    Clytemnestra: “Shall I call this happy news, or dreadful but profitable? Hapless am I, that I save my life at the cost of my own miseries.”
    Sophocles — from ‘Electra’, his later treatment of the story of the revenge of Orestes as dramatized earlier by Aeschylus in his ‘Oresteia’.
    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
    Afterword
    Somewhat as I suspect Faye did when he had completed Convergence, I sat finally sat back and read through this essay. I found myself deeply disturbed by the enormity of it all.
    Should you the reader so be taken, I can offer little other than to suggest that you just write it off as no more than another example of my penchant for outrageous hyperbole, an ill-conceived example of reductio ad absurdum.
    Alternatively, of course, you could pray that I am wrong. There is really nothing else that I can think of that would help.
    — Seneca III, Middle England, August 6th 2015.
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    61,091

    Default

    “France is no Longer for the French”

    Posted on August 15, 2015 by Baron Bodissey
    There’s been a lot of news coverage lately about the immigrant crisis in the area around Calais, where illegals almost continuously attack the entrance to the Channel Tunnel in their attempts to get to the Promised Land, a.k.a. Britain.
    The following video from Riposte Laïque describes another facet of the same crisis: the plight of native French people whose lives are being disrupted — if not destroyed — by the hordes of Third-World barbarians camped almost on their doorsteps.
    Many thanks to Oz-Rita for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
    Below is the essay that accompanied the video. Many thanks to CB Sashenka for the translation, which was posted earlier at Vlad Tepes in a slightly different form:
    The Shocking Testimony of a Calais Resident Surrounded by 3,000 Illegal Immigrants
    by Caroline Alamachère
    This government is the dregs of our country, the shame of our nation!
    To Hollande, (President of France) Valls, (French Prime Minister) Cazeneuve, (Minister of Interior) Taubira, (Justice Minister) and their associates, and all the others who allow the French to live in fear because of your thoughtlessness and your submission to superior diktats from foreign countries not worth mentioning, you submit the people to hordes of barbarians that come from who knows where, individuals whom the media portray as unfortunate victims of war so that they can be fed on the money of those whom they terrorize.
    The testimony of two Calais residents, a mother and daughter, frightening in its harshness, in its horror, heart-rending in its sincerity, in the traumatic silence of an unfortunate Calais resident found one day holed up in her basement, terrorized by rioting illegals whom even the police are afraid to approach.
    Her daughter tells all, bluntly, frantically, in a hurry, in anguish. And she accuses. She accuses these good-for-nothings, these jackasses, these government pieces of garbage for allowing this evil in, destroying everything in its path.
    Bastards that you are, bad guys, despicable turds!
    This woman courageously tells, in a few minutes, the inconceivable, the extreme poverty of her mother, the security she had to enforce around her house that’s missing only a watchtower, the games of the illegal immigrants who are having a good time forgetting that they were asked to look sad and haggard, the inaction of police officers and their council to do their job for them with the added lawsuit risk on top of everything. Thank you Taubira! (French minister for justice)
    And those French who suffer the reprisal, the aggression, and who are asked to pay, to pay and pay, over and over again, until they bleed, until there is no longer enough to eat, so that others may live high off the fat of the land at our expense and afford the latest smart-phones, so that they can enjoy the space just around the corner from you to play soccer while you’re closing the fourth lock on your armoured door, and firefighters wait for a moment of calm before entering the forbidden city so they don’t risk their lives, with the help of police officers, the same ones who never come when they are called, when an old lady silenced by fear is in danger to the point of having to run to her cellar like a rat, when it’s her daughter who comes at 3:00am, alone, to help her.
    Holland, Valls, Cazeneuve, Taubira, you’re monsters, hydras. You are not legitimate to govern my country, you are guilty of the daily deaths due to your complacency, your treachery.
    And you, the French people, where are you?! Will you finally wake up from your apathy, yes or no? What are you waiting for, for your kid to be killed? How many attacks will it take for you to do something!
    Video transcript:


    00:00 I present my mum to you, Mme (name?)
    00:04 who lives on (address omitted by translator for security of the woman).
    00:08 This street should be called “Migrant Street”.
    00:12 She has been living here for 45 years. She has lost her husband,
    00:16 so she lives alone. She was never advised
    00:20 by the authorities of the migrants’ arrival on her street,
    00:24 nor have any authorities reassured her. She is unable to speak
    00:28 because she is still in shock
    00:32 and has difficulties expressing herself. So I resume:
    00:37 I’ll try to be brief.
    00:41 More than 3,000 migrants opposite one person who lives alone.
    00:45 Not a single visit
    00:49 by anyone to help her. So we had to
    00:53 install security, a gate,
    00:57 install a camera and sensors,
    01:01 barbed wire etc.
    01:05 Nine police interventions because of nine break-ins
    01:09 for theft. My mum lives on €600 ($670) per month,
    01:13 so while I’m at it, I call on associations to help me.
    01:17 After that she no longer
    01:21 go out, does not do her shopping,
    01:25 so if you have some potatoes left over, as I see bag after bag in the street
    01:30 don’t hesitate to leave one or two here, it would be welcome.
    01:34 I expect a lot from the police,
    01:38 who have become invisible, except when they accompany the migrants to
    01:42 their meals at the centre. At night
    01:46 she is all alone. There was a riot on the 30 May.
    01:50 We dialled the emergency number twice, there was a “guerrilla [war]” of 400 migrants
    01:54 and firebombs. We are still waiting for them.
    01:58 So I came alone at 3 am
    02:02 with fifty armed migrants in the street.
    02:07 I had to turn around in the court there, with the handbrake on
    02:11 I had no choice, and she was in the cellar.
    02:15 Yes, she was locked in the cellar, the house was being pelted with stones.
    02:19 The police I encountered at the end of the street told me:
    02:23 ”Don’t go there.” But it was my duty to protect my mother because no-one else does it.
    02:27 They said: “We are waiting for the firefighters, who will not go there without us.”
    02:31 The police, I said,
    02:35 we rang emergency twice, we are still waiting. After that they came to see her, too late.
    02:39 So I do the work of law enforcement, I do the work
    02:43 of the State, and
    02:47 they do nothing. They (migrants) are, we are told “traumatised”.
    02:51 Allegedly they saw their families assassinated before their eyes, so they say…
    02:55 when I see them play football, when I see them laugh,
    03:00 when I see them singing, I think they’re having a party, after all,
    03:04 then I think of our forefathers who fought for their country
    03:08 in the wars of 1914-18 and 1939-45, they had the courage
    03:12 to stay in France, they had the courage to
    03:16 defend the flag blue-white-red, for equality, fraternity,
    03:20 and all that, these great words,
    03:24 and now, people of Calais, as all French people, work, work well
    03:28 work long hours so that these migrants live well, better than you,
    03:32 and then they ask us
    03:36 that there be no street lights, because this will incite them to party loudly.
    03:40 (unclear)… We need public lighting.
    03:44 If we cannot have street lights, at least install cameras
    03:49 Madame Prefect is well-informed, she “manages”, she says.
    03:53 So, a little camera at each house would be welcome.
    03:57 It will not cost too much;
    04:01 the bases are there, so just a few more cables are needed.
    04:05 And then I would like to know about the procedure:
    04:09 What happens when migrants break into the house of my mother?
    04:13 Will I call the police?
    04:17 They don’t come. I do their work, so
    04:21 I call out to the migrants. I tell them I’ll get my gun, as a joke,
    04:25 but also to express my anger, and then I’m called before the law.
    04:29 They take my DNA, my fingerprints;
    04:33 they take my photo. I’m classified like a criminal,
    04:38 and over there, they stone me, they make the sign of decapitation at me,
    04:42 and the affair will be classified. So in France,
    04:46 what is happening? France is no longer for the French, I’m afraid.
    04:50 It’s just to help “the others”.
    04:54 The French are just there to pay.
    04:58 I’d like to know what was signed with this Touquet agreement?
    05:02 It would be good to know the truth.
    05:06 It would be good if the French would wake up, especially the people of Calais.
    05:10 They don’t have these problems at their door, so one has one’s quiet little life
    05:14 one’s little work,
    05:18 one’s little allocations, (unclear). Tomorrow
    05:22 you will have these horrors at your doors, and then I will applaud,
    05:27 but don’t come and see me then. Voilà.
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •