Canada Is Toast Thread

[Lenno]

[Lenno]

[Lenno]

Canada: Trudeau examining ways to silence “hateful criticism” over “anti-Islamophobia” motion M-103

March 6, 20174:15 pm By Christine Williams 2 Comments

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is now considering unspecified actions to hamper free speech and silence hateful criticism…. According to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) the Liberal government is prepared to “tackle any form of hate or threat” directed at Members of Parliament (MP).
Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,” PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote.

Every citizen in Canada is also entitled to live in a country where he or she feels safe from jihad terror and the Islamic agenda of civilizational jihad and conquest outlined in the Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Plan for North America.
The controversy in Canada over hatred and threats allegedly directed to Members of Parliament (MP) is part of the larger controversy over Toronto-area MP Iqra Khalid’s efforts to force through “anti-Islamophobia” motion M-103. The Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs, among others, presented her with the option of promoting instead a motion against “anti-Muslim bigotry,” rejecting the term “Islamophobia” as “misleading, ambiguous, and politically charged,” but Khalid remains resolute in pushing her anti- “Islamophobia” agenda, which is widely seen as a first step to curb the freedom of speech. Her motion enables the current incursion of anti-democratic values into Canada, as we see from the example of Europe: the Muslim migrant chaos and rampant crime, including the rape of infidel women, has been arrogantly waved away by leftist politicians and leaders who insist that it is “racist” to point out the fact that Islamic texts contain justifications for such crimes. These rapes are not isolated cases, but are committed so frequently in part because of the justification for them within Islamic teaching:

(Quran 24:31) And tell the believing women to reduce of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.

If a woman does not cover up, she is fair game to be assaulted:

(Quran 33:59) O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.

Any Muslim who supports democracy and the rights of women is quick to maintain that the literal understanding of such texts are antiquated, barbaric and have no place in modern times.
Omar Alghabra, another Toronto-area MP, has resorted to arrogantly insulting Canadians for daring to question the obvious threat of introducing Sharia values into Canada. Back in 2002, Alghabra stated that he did not believe that Hamas (a Muslim Brotherhood proxy group) or Islamic Jihad were terrorist groups, prompting any reasonable Canadian to question Alghabra’s personal commitment to Canadian and Western values. Alghabra has also “openly stated that he favors Sharia Law for Ontario and that he was disappointed when he did not happen in Ontario after the 2003/2006 debate in Ontario.”
The “Islamophobia” agenda is being pushed at the highest levels. The former Secretary General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, Ekmeleddin Mehmet İhsanoğlu, has stated: “The OIC has become an indispensable player at the international level, in many domains, notably in the realms of dialogue among civilizations, defending the image of Islam, and combating the phenomenon of Islamophobia.”
The OIC is an international organization with the objective of establishing global Sharia. Its activists exploit the generosity of Westerners as they aggressively beat down critics through intimidation and the imputation of guilt. In the case of M-103, Iqra Khalid uses the victimology narrative to promote her “Islamophobia” agenda…..

Iqra Khalid, the Toronto-area Muslim MP who introduced the divisive “Islamophobia” motion without defining “Islamophobia,” told reporters last month that she received a lot of angry emails over her potential legislation. Someone even called her an “idiot” and “*******,” she reported.
Another writer apparently promised not to shoot Khalid but said he was “going to be there to film you on the ground crying.”

While Khalid advances her schemes through guilt, she was in cahoots with the virulently anti-Semitic Muslim Student Association; she was its president while at York University as a student, and she has also allied herself with Palestine House in Mississauga, which was defunded by the Conservative Harper government for supporting terrorism.

“Trudeau Gov’t Looking At Ways To Protect Members Of Parliament From Hateful Criticism”, by David Krayden, Daily Caller, March 5, 2017:

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is now considering unspecified actions to hamper free speech and silence hateful criticism, says the Liberal-friendly Toronto Star. According to the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) the Liberal government is prepared to “tackle any form of hate or threat” directed at Members of Parliament (MP).
The hatred in question is the criticism being leveled at many Liberal MPs for supporting Motion M-103, which targets what the motion’s author sees as an epidemic of “Islamophobia” in Canada. The motion has been debated in Parliament and is expected to easily pass with the Liberal government’s majority in the House of Commons.
The PMO cagily refused “to confirm or deny” the anticipated actions now being considered by the Trudeau cabinet but did acknowledge that the government is working on a plan to make an MP’s workplace safe from angry constituents.
“Every member of Parliament — and indeed, every Canadian — is entitled to work and live in an environment that is free of hate speech and the threat of violence,” PMO spokesman Cameron Ahmad wrote.
The concept of “hate speech” remains a controversial one in criminal law because it is subject to broad interpretation.
“As always, we remain eager to work alongside MPs, including opposition members, to tackle any form of hate or threat to ensure all MPs and their staff are guaranteed a safe working environment,” Ahmad said.
Iqra Khalid, the Toronto-area Muslim MP who introduced the divisive “Islamophobia” motion without defining “Islamophobia,” told reporters last month that she received a lot of angry emails over her potential legislation. Someone even called her an “idiot” and “*******,” she reported.
Another writer apparently promised not to shoot Khalid but said he was “going to be there to film you on the ground crying.”
Omar Alghabra, another Toronto-area MP who expressed enthusiasm for Khalid’s motion, suggested the government needs to stop hateful critics for the sake of staffers who have to read the noxious material.
“I’m the political candidate and I’m the representative, and I expect people will be saying sometimes tough things towards me, but I want to make sure that my staff who has maybe never seen this before . . . are protected, and know that everything is OK,” Alghabra said.
Alghabra dismissed criticism of Khalid’s motion as the work of people influenced by “misinformation and ignorance”….

[Lenno]

[Lenno]

Canadian judge resigns over rape comments

Published March 10, 2017 Associated Press


Facebook0 Twitter0 Email Print


OTTAWA, Ontario – A Canadian judge who asked a woman why she couldn't keep her knees together after she alleged sexual assault in a trial said Thursday that he is resigning from the bench.


ADVERTISEMENT


THE WEEK IN PICTURES
Justice Robin Camp said in a statement released by his lawyer that he will resign effective Friday.

Camp said he's sorry for the hurt he has caused.
The council's decision supported a recommendation by a disciplinary panel that reviewed the original sexual assault trial of Alexander Wagar.

Court transcripts from the 2014 trial in Calgary show that Camp, who was a provincial court judge at the time, called the complainant "the accused" numerous times and told her "pain and sex sometimes go together."
Camp found Wagar not guilty, but the Appeal Court ordered a new trial. Last month, Wager was acquitted again.
The council said that Canadians expect their judges to know the law, have empathy and to recognize and question any past personal attitudes that might prevent them from acting fairly.
Four of the council's 23 members did not support the decision, saying they agreed that Camp's comments amounted to judicial misconduct, but were in favor of recommending a sanction short of removal.
Camp's lawyer, Frank Addario, had previously argued that his client should be allowed to keep his current job as a federal court judge.
"Removal is not necessary to preserve public confidence in this case. Justice Camp's misconduct was the product of ignorance, not animus. He has worked hard to correct his knowledge deficit," Addario wrote in a rebuttal submission to the judicial council.

[Lenno]

172017Why is a fancy hotel in Canada allowing Muslims to lift their asses to allah in the middle of their main lobby?



Château Montebello is a hotel, a luxury hotel in Quebec. Typically, guests at a hotel have a room. So clearly praying in the most inconvenient and public areas is not about religious devotion, but about establishing primacy for their religion. This is what Muslim supremacists like to do, shoving their filthy cult pretending to be a religion, into our faces at every opportunity.


Vlad Tepes (h/t Susan K) After all, if you were to gently tap them on the shoulder and ask them where the gift shop was, which would be appropriate behaviour in a hotel lobby, likely you would be thrown out as if you disrupted a service at a mosque.

If you complained that people were making it difficult to conduct your normal business in the lobby because they were face down on the rug, arse skyward mumbling, you would likely be castigated for being racist, even though a behaviour can’t be racist, and these people chose to do that behaviour in an inappropriate place.

The following text is from the originating Facebook page: one hour ago, Muslim couple praying at the lobby of a very prestigious hotel in Montebello, QC.

1- Don’t they have a PRIVATE room to go and pray?

2- If not, what are they doing here?

3- Is Islam a political ideology?

4- Is this a new way to create distressful atmosphere and play the victim-hood game to assist Muslim brotherhood MPs M-103 Motion?

5- Have they been told by Imams to dress like Muslims and pray everywhere and anywhere by imams- Reliance of the Traveler

6- What is the purpose of such prayers in public? Exercise or showcase? Can anyone have intimate time with the creator praying at a lobby of a hotel?

7-Or is this called a domination display with the intend to attract attention, assert their Islamic presence & challenge the surrounding culture with intent to conquer?

[Lenno]

Canada Has Detained More Mexicans In 2 Months Than In All Of 2016…


Life is so bad in Mexico; the illegal aliens are self-deporting to Canada to avoid deportation back to Mexico.
Via CBC:

The Canada Border Services Agency detained more Mexican migrants in the first two months of 2017 than it did in all of 2016, new statistics show.
According to the CBSA, 444 Mexicans had been detained in Canada as of March 9.
In 2016, 410 Mexicans were held by Canadian border officials.
The spike comes immediately after Canada’s federal government lifted its visa requirement for Mexican citizens in December. In January alone, 70 Mexicans made refugee claims upon arriving in Canada.
At that time, Conservative Foreign Affairs critic Peter Kent told CBC News the change was not surprising.
“We anticipated there would be, if not an immediate spike, a surge, and it seems that is what’s happening.”
Many Mexicans looking north have shifted their focus from the United States to Canada as President Donald Trump vows to crack down on America’s undocumented immigrants, about half of whom are Mexican.
Keep reading…

[Lenno]

Canada: Man charged with threatening to shoot people inside mosque is…Muslim

March 21, 2017 1:22 pm By Robert Spencer Leave a Comment
Hate crime is a booming business today: both Leftists and their Muslim allies are making as much of use of hate crimes as they possibly can in order to discredit foes of jihad terror and Sharia oppression as racist, redneck, violent yahoos who deserve no place in the public square. There’s just one problem: actual […]

[Lenno]

12 Mar222017
Just as Donald Trump vows to cut funding to UN terror-linked groups, Justin Trudeau is happy to pick up the slack

Canadians shouldn’t be surprised that their Islamophile prime minister, Justin Trudeau, will reverse former PM Stephen Harper’s policy of not funding United Nations groups that support and glorify terrorism like the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, a group formerly defunded for financing Hamas by previous government.


The Rebel Despite the government’s effort to cover up this story, Canada has started funding UNRWA again recently before Canadians ever knew what was happening.

In the interview linked here, an associate fellow at The Middle East Forum explains why this funding was removed in 2010 due to UNRWA facilities being used as terrorist bases and vehicles used to transport fighters and weapons.

The funding was made on November 7th, even though the announcement of the money wasn’t made until November 15th, a week later. And the plan for rolling this out, included giving a heads up to the NDP and Green leader Elizabeth May, but not to the Conservatives who opposed the move.

Canada had long been a funder of UNRWA but after this information came to light, after one too many incidents of school books used by UNRWA inciting hatred, Canada, under Stephen Harper pulled its funding, but the Liberals never liked that move. But even as the Liberals prepared to reinstate funding, they acknowledged that money being diverted to terrorism was a possibility.

As UN Watch has documented in its report, many of the teachers and administrators at UNRWA, at least according to their social media profiles, love Adolf Hitler, hate Jews, celebrate killings, stabbing and bombing and generally back terrorist groups. They also made a video documenting this so lawmakers could see for themselves before they made the decision to give money to UNRWA, but they still did.

UNRWA has been proven to have dangerous connections to terrorist groups while also inciting death to the Jews and an end to Israel.

Emigrate While You Still Can! Learn More…

[Lenno]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJMVFFDKDv8