The Commie Revolution Thread

[Lenno]

I first saw him on CNN in the 12AM-1AM slot:

Keith Olbermann's Epic Meltdown Over ‘usurper’ Trump

We all remember the insane one, Keith Olbermann, sports correspondent for CNN, host of ESPN's SportsCenter, political commentator at MSNBC, chief news officer of the Current TV network, host at ESPN2 and TSN2, now host of a little known political web series for GQ.com, titled "The Resistance"

From a cheesy set that looks like it was rescued from a dumpster behind a local community theater company, and sounding like he's broadcasting from an abandoned warehouse somewhere in New Jersey, Olbermann lets rip a heated commentary in which he angrily pounds his fist on his desk as he urges Barack Obama to help prevent Donald Trump from assuming the presidency. He goes on to proclaim that allowing Trump to be sworn into office could mean the end to future elections in America. It's drama boy Olbermann at his demented best..........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ8zSsKW0zg

[Lenno]

HATE CRIME? College Republican President Assaulted. Media Silent…




<img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-31361" src="http://louderwithcrowder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/cornell1-1024x535.jpg" alt="College Republican President" width="1024" height="535" srcset="http://louderwithcrowder.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/cornell1-300x157.jpg 300w, http://louderwithcrowder.com/wp-cont...l1-768x401.jpg 768w, http://louderwithcrowder.com/wp-cont...1-1024x535.jpg 1024w, http://louderwithcrowder.com/wp-cont...2/cornell1.jpg 1200w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"/>
Golly, there seems to be a lot of politically motivated hate crimes after Trump’s election. Like this college Republican president, who claims to have been assaulted by people who aren’t fans of the President-elect.


Oh, it says “Republican.” Assault in this case is totes kewl…

The president of the Cornell University College Republicans was shoved to the ground and called a “racist bitch” the night after the election, and campus officials are currently investigating the incident.
“Out of nowhere I was on my phone and looking at my email and out of nowhere I felt two hands grab my shoulders and just sort of threw me to the ground, and they were yelling ‘**** you racist bitch, you support a racist party,’” Corn said.
She has reported the incident to Cornell police and the university’s Title IX office.



This incident also does not mark the first time she has been harassed for her Republican identity. She added that after she was quoted in a Cornell Daily Sun article in May saying she would vote for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton, she received death threats.

Now, I want to be fair here because we’ve discussed hoaxes before (see Muslim Student Claimed Trump Supporters Harassed Her. Arrested for Lying! and Albany Hate Crime Hoax: Lying Race-Baiters Now Officially Indicted). This is an alleged incident. The only evidence of this incident is the student’s word. Okay? Okay.
But do you notice that when a Republican student makes a claim of a hate crime for her beliefs, it only goes as far as the student newspaper? Yet when a leftist makes a similar claim, in reverse (that is, being attacked by a Trump-supporter), every national media outlet seems to have an opinion on it. Here’s looking at you HuffPoop (lazy pot shot. Still not sorry).
A woman having two assailants mansplain politics to her, then shove her to the ground? If the woman was a college Democrat president, it’s all we’d hear about. There would be hashtags, feminists would grow out their armpit hair to braid-able lengths. So they may tie a new awareness ribbon into the pit braids. You’re now free to move about the vomit.


But she’s just a pretty Republican girl. Probably deserved it, according to liberals. What with her supporting a violent racist (their beliefs). Ergo it’s fine to push her into the ground, call her a racist bitch. #Tolerance
Maddening. The word “alleged” also seems to vary depending on what fits the leftist agenda. Behold, this:

[Lenno]

Conservative Actor and Daughter, 9, Assaulted by Musician's Wife Over Trump Support

"Grab 'em by the pussy!"

12.16.2016 Scott Baio has filed a police report claiming that the wife of the Red Hot Chili Peppers drummer physically assaulted him at a school function with their children over his support of Donald Trump.
TMZ reports that Baio says he was at a holiday program with his daughter Saturday in Thousand Oaks, California, when Nancy Mack, whose children attend the same elementary school, confronted him about his support for President-Elect Trump. Mack, who is married to drummer Chad Smith, is very vocally anti-Trump. Baio says she began berating and cursing him, demanding to know how he could support a man who had once said of women, "Grab 'em by the pussy." Baio claims she repeatedly screamed that phrase, "Grab 'em by the pussy!".
Baio told the police that he asked Mack to quiet down because kids were present, but she persisted.
Baio asked Nancy to stop, but he claims she kept repeating the comment because she felt everyone needed to hear what Trump had said. Mack reportedly attacked him, grabbing him under his arms and shaking and pushing him. According to Red State, Baio’s wife Renee said Mack hit Scott and shoved him twice, put her finger in her daughter’s face, then screamed at her, asking her if she wanted someone to grab her pussy. Renee also said she has video of the incident, and that Mack’s own sons say “they’re used to her vile behavior.”
Sources close to Mack say she denies any physical aggression and was merely trying to show Baio how Trump hugs women. Right.
Both before and after the election, the vast preponderance of political violence has come from the anti-Trump crowd, not from Trump supporters as the left insists.
The Ventura County Sheriff's Dept. is investigating the incident. Mack is listed as a battery suspect.

[Lenno]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BX78HAqUj1k

[Lenno]

Obama Wants to Create More Victims of White Privilege

More phony racial “identities” -- for more racial conflict.

December 14, 2016
Bruce Thornton


Bruce Thornton is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
For a couple of years Obama and the U.S. Census Bureau have been working on adding to the 2020 census a new ethnic group, or “racial category.” This new addition to the conga-line of victims of white hegemony is called “Mena,” comprising people from the Middle East and North Africa, which includes very culturally diverse peoples from Berbers to Israelis, Arabs to Persians. All sorts of soothing rationales have been put forth for this move, such as helping government and scholars “understand more about trends in health, employment and education,” as USA Today put it. But in reality the change would create even more clients for what radio hosts Larry Elder calls “Victicrats,” the Democrat Party and identity politics hustlers who gain political power and influence by claiming to champion the “people of color” victimized by “white privilege” and racial oppression.
The White House is frank about how altering the census would make this happen: impacting how the Voting Rights Act is enforced and Congressional districts are drawn; creating affirmative action plans and monitoring discrimination in housing, bank lending, and education; and identifying new recipients of government largess. That is, targeting those who would be inclined to vote Democrat once they are the beneficiaries of more government patronage. In addition, since most of these people identify as “white” on the current census, giving them a different option would support the Democrats’ narrative of a demographic shift that is reducing whites to a minority, and that will create The Coming Democrat Majority, as John Judis and Ruy Teixera called it in their 2004 book. Removing some 10 million “Menas” from the white category would confirm that thesis and comfort those still grieving over Donald Trump’s electoral refutation of that hypothesis.
More broadly, this scheme to alter the census reveals just how incoherent and corrupt are our ethnic and racial identity politics. Take the category “Hispanic.” It ignores the diversity of class, religion, culture, and language that separates these groups and create their identities. It asserts that a Mixtec Indian from Oaxaca, who speaks Mixtec instead of Spanish, supposedly shares an identity with a third-generation Mexican-American from California, who speaks English instead of Spanish. Such a broad term is meaningless, collapsing together Caucasians, blacks, Indians, mestizos, and mulattos who happen to have Spanish surnames.
The same is true of all the other racial categories. “Black” could mean an American descendant of slaves, or a mulatto born of a white woman and a Kenyan, or an immigrant from countries as different from one another as Nigeria and Trinidad. It ignores regional, class, and educational differences among American blacks, predicating their “blackness” solely on skin color and the assertion that they are all victims of endemic white racism. “Asian” is equally ridiculous, for it bases identity merely on inhabiting the same vast continent. It’s amazing that the people who fervently worship at the altar of diversity endorse crude racial categories that are left over from the “scientific racism” of early 20^th century progressives, and that erase the incredible diversity of human cultures and individuals.
The worst category, however, is “white.” These days “white” is an ideological artifact, defining millions of diverse peoples by their alleged “privilege,” notions of “supremacy,” racism, xenophobia, sexual repression, and neurotic fear of the dark-skinned “other” and cultural differences. Or, as a professor at California State University San Marcos recently said at a “Whiteness Forum,” “a system of power based on racist ideology maintained discursively, institutionally, and materially.” This definition of “White” reduces 200 million Americans to a caricature based on late fifties sit-coms like The Donna Reed Show and Father Knows Best, an antiseptic, homogenous suburban world where everybody is white, middle class, church-going, and sexually uptight.
This ideologically loaded definition of “whiteness” also erases from our public awareness the millions of poor and working class people struggling with unemployment, drug addiction, reduced life expectancy, and destructive patterns of behavior similar to those plaguing the black inner cities. J.D. Vance’s memoir Hillbilly Elegy called attention to these problems for about a month, but hasn’t led to a sustained recognition and discussion of this disaster, or demands for government intervention to address it. To progressives and the mainstream media, the alleged epidemic of “hate crimes” against American Muslims, or the outbreak of “microagressions” on Ivy League campuses is infinitely more important and worthy of government action.



In reality there is no such thing as “white people.” The colonists who rebelled against the British Empire and created the United States were differentiated by religion, region, dialects, economic interests, and origins. That diversity explains our political order, one based on recognizing these differences, but institutionally balancing them in order to protect both the freedom of the people and their diverse interests and identities.
Take England, from which the bulk of early settlers came. The people of England comprised Celts, Irish, Scots, Welsh, Saxons, Angles, Jutes, Romano-Britons, Scandinavians, and French Normans, themselves a hybrid of Scandinavians and Gallo-Romans, Germanic Franks, and Celts. They came to America professing different denominations of Christianity, from Anglican to Presbyterian, Catholic to Quaker, Congregationalist to Unitarian. The regional diversity they settled in contributed to different cultural practices, economies, and social mores. A Tidewater Anglican Virginian lived a life quite different from a Piedmont Scots-Irish Presbyterian, let alone a Boston Unitarian. And the different beliefs of a slave-owner and an abolitionist, along with the clashing economic interests among tradesmen and farmers, merchants and plantation owners, ultimately were so divisive that they could be resolved only by a bloody civil war.
After confirmed by the Civil War, within a few decades the Constitutional solution to such extensive diversity began to be dismantled by the progressive movement and its centralization and concentration of power in the federal government. Progressives created an abstract continent-wide “people” with uniform interests, one that ignored or minimized all those differences that federalism and divided government kept from threatening freedom. The new hypertrophied federal government substituted an expanded executive of technocratic bureaus and agencies that imposed uniform policies and regulations on the diversity of the states, reducing the autonomy of individuals and state governments alike.
The next phase was the rise of leftist identity politics in the sixties, which created “multiculturalism,” an Orwellian term that encouraged new divisions based not on reality, but on a manufactured racial and ethnic identity predicated on historical victimization and the racism of the white majority. It also redefined “diversity,” replacing the de facto diversity that has existed in the West for millennia, with a superficial diversity masking an ideological unity intolerant of real diversity. And it wielded political correctness as the linguistic weapon for enforcing that ideology. The purveyors of these new identities then looked to the federal government to enforce this narrative and create redistributive programs that empowered these “protected” groups and compensated them for the historical crimes of whites. In the sixties the Democrat Party embraced the new balkanization and the big government that validated and rewarded it.
So here we are today, with phony ethnic and racial “identities” often as crude as the Jim Crow stereotypes that validated segregation and discrimination. Now Big Government is the arbiter of the conflicting interests of a diverse people, putting its thumb on the policy scales in favor of the “protected classes,” and overriding the power of the states and the law-making powers of Congress in order to compensate one party’s clients. And its endorsement of political correctness has contributed to the erosion of the individual’s Constitutionally protected freedom of speech.
This overweening and partisan intrusion was intensified during the Obama years by his divisive racial politics and support of activists like Black Lives Matter, and by his bypassing the Constitution and making laws through executive orders, directives to federal agencies, and signing statements. Obama’s naked power-grab and stoking of racial animosity is what fired up working class “whites” to turn out and vote for Donald Trump, after they rejected the mainstream Republicans who they perceived had given in to the multicultural and “diversity” racket subsidized and enforced by the federal government.
Now Donald Trump must deliver on his promises to begin rolling back the policies and programs that have picked winners and losers from among the great diversity of the people’s “passions and interests,” rather than trusting in divided government to give these factions scope yet not let them overwhelm other factions. Our new president can start by pruning the executive agencies and their regulations, reinvigorating federalism, and ditching all the racial and ethnic categories on the census, let alone allowing the creation of a new one like the preposterous “Mena.”

[Lenno]

“And to President Clinton,” President Abbot said into the camera, “I ask that you stop your threats of war and allow the Free States of America to separate in peace, and let our two nations remain brothers instead of enemies. Goodnight, and God bless all Americans.”
“Arrrgh!” shrieked Hillary, heaving her tumbler at the Oval Office big screen. The empty glass missed, hitting a bust of Saul Alinsky on the mantle. It smashed into a cloud of shards and ice; She certainly didn’t let any of her Macallan Lalique whisky go to waste.
Her entourage cringed – they hadn’t seen Her so mad since She made a surprise visit to Chappaqua and found a wrinkly Bill eating a Big Mac in the bubbling hot tub with a 19 year-old blonde CW actress, Chelsea’s bustiest bridesmaid, and that chick who carried a mattress around because of patriarchy.
“They think they’re going to secede, huh? Well, call my generals, because this means war!”
Now, the two dozen conservative states that had seceded a week ago had done it quickly, peacefully and reluctantly. After Hillary’s hand-picked Supreme Court majority started upholding her flurry of executive orders – she didn’t bother with legislation anymore – there seemed no other choice. First, it was the newly discovered “right to environmental justice” that required a ban on fracking and the imposition of climate change regulations that threatened to bankrupt middle-America. Next, it announced a right to state-funded abortions at any time until the baby leaves the hospital. Then there was the discovery of exceptions to the First Amendment that allowed Her to ban critiques of Planned Parenthood (“There is no right to advocate anti-woman ideas!”), demands for stricter immigration laws (“There is no right to advocate against anti-undocumented workers!”), and criticism of Hillary Herself (“This dissent is unpatriotic!”).
ut the boulder that broke the camel’s back was Hillary’s unilateral ban on the private ownership of guns (“We must protect the children! I mean, ones that have been born. And left the hospital. Those children only. Not others.”). The governors of the primarily Southern and Midwestern states of what would become the Free States secretly met, planned, and acted. The big issue was securing the military installations on seceding soil; there was no siege of Fort Sumter this time. Most of the commanders of those bases, and most of their troops, hailed from the Free States. They joined the new nation’s military, which served under the same Constitution (though interpreted accordingly to its text, not liberal necessity) and under the same flag (though with about half as many stars).


The new Joint Chiefs trembled at the situation room table as Hillary screamed at them. “Why the hell are we spending all this money on you!” she howled. Actually, that was untrue – most military units were classified as “Unfit for Combat Operations” due to the budget cuts necessary to fund Hillary’s entitlement programs.
“Madame President, it’s not that simple,” said the new Army Chief of Staff, who had been appointed because of her courage in becoming the military’s first transgender general officer. Back during the wars, when she was still called “Mike,” she had avoided deployment as head of the Army’s diversity initiative.




“Seems pretty simple to me,” Hillary retorted, pausing to take a hard swig from her “water” bottle. “You gather some Army guys together AND GO GET ME MY COUNTRY BACK!”
The generals left quickly, none of them willing to explain to the President that when half the country went away, 75% of the military went away to go with it. And those who remained were hardly the cream of the crop.
Lieutenant Colonel Myron Putney had been a self-described “Army strategist” who served among the herd of majors on the staffs of various divisions around the Army. He considered his personal liberalism a mark of distinction from the knuckledraggers he worked with and looked down upon; while they were out in the field leading mere soldiers, he was wielding real influence drafting position papers.
Now those Neanderthals were mostly gone, and he was finally in command of an infantry battalion. He had held a company command job once, but that lasted only two months before that unsophisticated ape Colonel Reisman relieved him, saying “I’m only saving your sorry fourth point of contact by pulling you out of command because I don’t want to have to do the paperwork when your troops frag you.”



Lieutenant Colonel Putney – he had been a major with no hope of promotion just the day before – surveyed his new unit, mostly filled with new recruits from northern cities and universities who volunteered after a massive mainstream media propaganda campaign. Many were women who, on average, could do more push-ups than the males.
Because of the “Inclusive Army’s” new regulations, there were a lot of unusual hairstyles and beard choices in the formation. One neckbearded guy, who had been inspired to join the war effort by The Daily Show (again hosted by Jon Stewart, but now showing on NBC in primetime), raised his soft hand.
“Yes, Private?”
“Uh, how long is this training today cuz I have a thing tonight I totally have to go to? It’s this open mic reading where we take the ideas we’ve been journaling and share them, accompanied by a squeezebox and a lute. Mine’s about how being male-identified makes me sad.”
“Uh,” replied the colonel. Another hand went up. “Yes?”



“Yeah, I was at lunch today and there was totally, like, no vegan alternative. Plus nothing seemed artisanal or locally sourced, and I felt my dietary needs were being marginalized.”
“Look, we are going to fight these southern racists, so we need to do some weapons training!” the commander shouted.
Another hand: “I don’t really believe in guns. Plus, this seems like kind of a patriarchal power structure here. I don’t see a lot of hearing of the voices of womyn, or trans and questioning people.”
Throughout the Old America, the military struggled to build combat units for the campaign to retake the Free States. Hillary adamantly refused to impose a draft and the initial wave of volunteers quickly soured on the experience when they found out it was going to be hard.
“Wait, they’re going to shoot at us?” one private asked LTC Putney. “They can’t do that. They shouldn’t be allowed to do that.”
“Right! And we’re the ones who are going to stop them.”
“No, I mean someone should stop them because it’s illegal. Maybe the police or something?”
“No, we’re going to do that. We’re the ones who will stop them. Us.”
“I don’t get it. What?”
A month later, LTC Putney’s battalion (scraped together from the remainders of five battalions) was on the border of Tennessee, preparing to invade the Free States. He was proud of the unit’s progress, especially after that unpleasantness involving a drunk female’s regret over a romantic encounter that led to a five-day pause in tactical training to address the pervasive rape culture within Hillary’s army. And then the general called him and directed him to go under a flag of truce as his representative to meet with the other side.
Putney was stunned to see his counterpart was the very same colonel who had relieved him years before, now chief of staff of a division in the Free States Army. “Sheesh, you?” sneered Colonel Reisman. “I should have known you’d be involved in that clusterfark.”
Puffing himself up to his maximum height, 5’9”, Putney replied: “I’m here to inform you that you are guilty of treason and on behalf of the President of the United States, I demand your surrender!”
“Listen up, Half Step,” replied Colonel Reisman. “I’ve had 19 Delta scouts watching that circus you call an army for the last month. You have no intel, you have no logistics, and you have no artillery that can get rounds to its guns, much less put them on target. You aren’t even a soup sandwich. You’re barely a piss biscuit.”
“I…,” Putney began.
“Stop talking. It’s been fun and games up to now, but this freak show stops here. We’re going to shake hands and everyone is going away happy back to Fort Living Room. See, across this line is our home. I have three heavy brigade combat teams ready to counterattack the second we see hostile intent. I have three supporting brigades of artillery, including MLRS, sited in on your axis of advance. You guys turn around, go back to your dorm rooms and coffee houses, and it’s all good. But you come into our home with guns with intent to do violence and we will teach you and your little task force of whiny little hipsters, femboys, and commies what killing really is. Do you read me? Now get the hell out of my sight.”
And so, the Second Civil War never happened. When a particularly brave reporter later asked a wobbly Hillary Clinton about why she failed to save the Union as Abraham Lincoln had done, she muttered something about “sexist questions” and how “all lives matter” before staggering away from the podium and back into the bowels of the White House.

[Lenno]

GoV: The Red-Green Alliance and the Perpetual “Asylum” Process

Posted on December 18, 2016 | 2 comments

That alliance of evil is not just limited to the place where Germany used to be.
FUSA is no more than a decade behind Germany or France at current course and speed.
Look at your daughters and granddaughters over the holidays.
Think deeply of the world they will inherit.
Got courage?

[Farp]

GoV: The Red-Green Alliance and the Perpetual “Asylum” Process

Posted on December 18, 2016 | 2 comments

That alliance of evil is not just limited to the place where Germany used to be.
FUSA is no more than a decade behind Germany or France at current course and speed.
Look at your daughters and granddaughters over the holidays.
Think deeply of the world they will inherit.
Got courage?

I always wondered what a real BOX OF ROCKS looked like.

[Lenno]

[Lenno]

From a reader, with scorn.
Here are better ideas.