Media and CIA Fall For "Golden Shower" Hoax

[breezy]

4Chan Claims To Have Fabricated Anti-Trump Report As A Hoax

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-0...mp-report-hoax

[BugoutBear]

Given how the NY "Nazi" Times, Washington comPost and other Liberal media's ran with this Fake News story, coupled with the "Intelligence Agencies" involvement I'd hazard to suggest perhaps DJTrump's life might be in danger. They're desperate, and when desperate people run out of options (as evidenced by this fake news) they can become very dangerous. Perhaps Alex Jones was correct about the CIA.

I believe we may have officially gone off the deep end.

[dissimulo]

Garbage in, garbage out. That has always been the problem with collecting information indiscriminately.

[TonyM]

Just as the commentariat began to shudder at the implications of this
bombshell, Buzzfeed released the actual dossier, 35 pages crammed with
allegations of grave wrongdoing, including espionage by Trump surrogates
against fellow Americans. This was a rather standard example of raw
human intelligence reporting, a mishmash of claims, some of them
obviously untrue. But the essence of its case—that Trump has been
playing footsie with Vladimir Putin for years and knowingly accepted his
secret help to win the White House—may well turn out to be true.

The media, unaccustomed to seeing raw HUMINT reports, acted aghast
at the salacious nature of some of the claims in the dossier: Trumpian
sex romps caught on camera by Russian spies, our new commander-in-chief
paying prostitutes to urinate on a hotel bed where President Obama had
slept. Whether those particular claims are true or not—and they ought to
be looked at with immense skepticism and even the PEOTUS himself said
today that his infamy as a germophobe, which way predates these accusations,
ought to raise concerns about some of these tales—there’s no doubt that
Putin’s Federal Security Service, the all-seeing FSB, keeps close tabs
on foreign VIP’s when they’re on their turf. If Trump was unwise enough
to engage in randy behavior in Russia, the FSB unquestionably has it on
video. ***

In truth, the provenance of the 35-page dossier is well known in proper channels.
Some of its assertions have beenmade by other NATO intelligence agencies,
privately. Some of its claims are false, some are true, and some may
linger between truth and fiction indefinitely. What’s important here is
that the IC leadership decided to brief a small circle of the most
senior American officials on that dossier’s findings. They don’t do
that, ever—treating raw private intelligence reports by foreigners as
worthy of briefing to “the top”—unless they can corroborate significant
portions of it.

http://observer.com/2017/01/donald-t...michael-cohen/

[nothingburger]

If a video does truly exist, the fallout from that being released would be entertaining to say the least.

[Farp]

If a video does truly exist, the fallout from that being released would be entertaining to say the least.

It's about time you said the least.

[TonyM]

Christopher Steele, Ex-British Intelligence Officer, Said to Have Prepared Dossier on Trump

A former British intelligence officer now working for a private
security-and-investigations firm produced the dossier of unverified
allegations about President-elect Donald Trump’s activities and
connections in Russia, people familiar with the matter say.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/christop...ump-1484162553

[Rusty34]

One out of two is a start...

[lonewolfinoregon]

Just as the commentariat began to shudder at the implications of this
bombshell, Buzzfeed released the actual dossier, 35 pages crammed with
allegations of grave wrongdoing, including espionage by Trump surrogates
against fellow Americans. This was a rather standard example of raw
human intelligence reporting, a mishmash of claims, some of them
obviously untrue. But the essence of its case—that Trump has been
playing footsie with Vladimir Putin for years and knowingly accepted his
secret help to win the White House—may well turn out to be true.

The media, unaccustomed to seeing raw HUMINT reports, acted aghast
at the salacious nature of some of the claims in the dossier: Trumpian
sex romps caught on camera by Russian spies, our new commander-in-chief
paying prostitutes to urinate on a hotel bed where President Obama had
slept. Whether those particular claims are true or not—and they ought to
be looked at with immense skepticism and even the PEOTUS himself said
today that his infamy as a germophobe, which way predates these accusations,
ought to raise concerns about some of these tales—there’s no doubt that
Putin’s Federal Security Service, the all-seeing FSB, keeps close tabs
on foreign VIP’s when they’re on their turf. If Trump was unwise enough
to engage in randy behavior in Russia, the FSB unquestionably has it on
video. ***

In truth, the provenance of the 35-page dossier is well known in proper channels.
Some of its assertions have beenmade by other NATO intelligence agencies,
privately. Some of its claims are false, some are true, and some may
linger between truth and fiction indefinitely. What’s important here is
that the IC leadership decided to brief a small circle of the most
senior American officials on that dossier’s findings. They don’t do
that, ever—treating raw private intelligence reports by foreigners as
worthy of briefing to “the top”—unless they can corroborate significant
portions of it.

http://observer.com/2017/01/donald-t...michael-cohen/

Again FAKE NEWS and NO EVIDENCE!!!

They claimed the Declassified report "WOULD LAY OUT ALL THE EVIDENCE!!"

YET, ALL SPECULATION AND ASSESSMENT!!!

Again NO EVIDENCE!!

I got a feeling after Trump swearing in another INVESTIGATION into INTELLIGENCE GATHERING will be launched...

[lonewolfinoregon]

If a video does truly exist, the fallout from that being released would be entertaining to say the least.

Yep after Trump sworn in, INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES will come out stating "There is NO SUCH VIDEO", "We have not been able to verify much of our ASSESSMENT!!!"