I don't have time to watch every vid I post, mores the pity! :)Originally Posted by RamRoddoc
Judge
I don't have time to watch every vid I post, mores the pity! :)
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
Google bows to Muslim pressure, changes search results to conceal criticism of Islam and jihad
July 26, 2017 12:36 pm By Robert Spencer 8 Comments
“Google’s first page results for searches of terms such as ‘jihad’, ‘shariah’ and ‘taqiyya’ now return mostly reputable explanations of the Islamic concepts. Taqiyya, which describes the circumstances under which a Muslim can conceal their belief in the face of persecution, is the sole term to feature a questionable website on
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
Breaking: Twitter Censors Eric Trump’s Drudge Tweet Showing Great American Job Numbers
Tweet praising job numbers marked as ‘potentially sensitive content’
Infowars.com - August 4, 2017 702 Comments
Image Credits: Alex Wong/Getty Images.
Share3K
Tweet1
+17
Pin
Shares 3K
Eric Trump on Friday exposed Twitter had censored a news story he shared showing great American job numbers.
In a Friday message to his followers, Trump showed how a tweet he shared from the Drudge Report Twitter account was blocked and labeled “potentially sensitive content.”
“Why are my tweets about jobs and the economy being censored?” Trump asked.
Eric was attempting to share a Drudge Report tweet from CNBC showing July job numbers grew by 209,000 jobs in July, beating the 183,000 expected job growth.
The shadow ban by Twitter underscores how the leftist social media platform actively works to hide tweets which reflect positively on the president.
During the 2016 presidential campaign, Twitter also censored positive replies to Trump tweets, in addition to tweets sent out by Trump himself.
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has previously expressed support for failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
Facebook deletes 288,000 “hate speech” posts monthly, including counter-jihad posts, Hamas-linked CAIR still plays victim
August 5, 2017 6:27 pm By Robert Spencer 15 Comments
Leave it to the Washington Post to ignore the real story — Facebook’s massive smearing of legitimate perspectives as “hate speech” and wholesale blocking or removal of counter-jihad material — and to focus on Muslims, and specifically the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations, as if they were the real victims of this censorship. In reality, it is being done on their behalf: Facebook’s Vice President Joel Kaplan traveled to Pakistan in July to assure the Pakistani government that it would remove “anti-Islam” material.
“In February, amid mounting concerns over Facebook’s role in the spread of violent live videos and fake news, Zuckerberg said the platform had a responsibility to ‘mitigate the bad’ effects of the service in a more dangerous and divisive political era.”
In mid-February, traffic to Jihad Watch from Facebook dropped suddenly by 90% and has never recovered. We do not post any hateful or provocative material and neither incite nor approve of violence, but Facebook is acting as judge, jury and executioner in all this. There is no appeal and no recourse.
This is at heart a Sharia endeavor, an Islamic supremacist attempt to compel the West to adopt Sharia blasphemy laws forbidding criticism of Islam, and it’s working well. So well, in fact, that as it goes on, as the ground is being cut out from under the feet of those whom she opposes, Hamas-linked CAIR’s Zahra Balloo can play the victim in the Washington Post.
“A white man called her kids the n-word. Facebook stopped her from sharing it.,” by Tracy Jan and Elizabeth Dwoskin, Washington Post, July 31, 2017:
…In February, amid mounting concerns over Facebook’s role in the spread of violent live videos and fake news, Zuckerberg said the platform had a responsibility to “mitigate the bad” effects of the service in a more dangerous and divisive political era. In June, he officially changed Facebook’s mission from connecting the world to community-building.
The company says it now deletes about 288,000 hate-speech posts a month.
But activists say that Facebook’s censorship standards are so unclear and biased that it is impossible to know what one can or cannot say.
The result: Minority groups say they are disproportionately censored when they use the social-media platform to call out racism or start dialogues. In the case of Latour and her family, she was simply repeating what the man who verbally assaulted her children said: “What the f— is up with those f—ing n—-r heads?”
Compounding their pain, Facebook will often go from censoring posts to locking users out of their accounts for 24 hours or more, without explanation — a punishment known among activists as “Facebook jail.”
“In the era of mass incarceration, you come into this digital space — this one space that seems safe — and then you get attacked by the trolls and put in Facebook jail,” said Stacey Patton, a journalism professor at Morgan State University, a historically black university in Baltimore. “It totally contradicts Mr. Zuckerberg’s mission to create a public square.”
In June, the company said that nearly 2 billion people now log onto Facebook each month. With the company’s dramatic growth comes the challenge of maintaining internally consistent standards as its content moderators are faced with a growing number of judgment calls.
“Facebook is regulating more human speech than any government does now or ever has,” said Susan Benesch, director of the Dangerous Speech Project, a nonprofit group that researches the intersection of harmful online content and free speech. “They are like a de facto body of law, yet that law is a secret.”
The company recently admitted, in a blog post, that “too often we get it wrong,” particularly in cases when people are using certain terms to describe hateful experiences that happened to them. The company has promised to hire 3,000 more content moderators before the year’s end, bringing the total to 7,500, and is looking to improve the software it uses to flag hate speech, a spokeswoman said.
“We know this is a problem,” said Facebook spokeswoman Ruchika Budhraja, adding that the company has been meeting with community activists for several years. “We’re working on evolving not just our policies but our tools. We are listening.”
Two weeks after Donald Trump won the presidency, Zahra Billoo, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ office for the San Francisco Bay area, posted to Facebook an image of a handwritten letter mailed to a San Jose mosque and quoted from it: “He’s going to do to you Muslims what Hitler did to the Jews.”
The post — made to four Facebook accounts — contained a notation clarifying that the statement came from hate mail sent to the mosque, as Facebook guidelines advise.
Facebook removed the post from two of the accounts — Billoo’s personal page and the council’s local chapter page — but allowed identical posts to remain on two others — the organization’s national page and Billoo’s public one. The civil rights attorney was baffled. After she re-posted the message on her personal page, it was again removed, and Billoo received a notice saying she would be locked out of Facebook for 24 hours.
“How am I supposed to do my work of challenging hate if I can’t even share information showing that hate?” she said.
Billoo eventually received an automated apology from Facebook, and the post was restored to the local chapter page — but not her personal one…
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
YouTube left up bloody jihad videos for over a year
August 7, 2017 5:12 am By Robert Spencer 6 Comments
YouTube was probably too busy, like Google, Facebook, and Twitter, censoring foes of jihad terror to bother about minutiae such as this.
“Shame of YouTube over Three Musketeers terror gang’s hate videos: Web giant failed to remove some of the material circulated by the trio for more than a year,” by Larisa Brown, Daily Mail, August 6, 2017:
Google was in the dock again over terror last night after it emerged an Islamist gang known as the Three Musketeers circulated hate-filled videos online.
Khobaib Hussain, 25, Naweed Ali, 29, and Mohibur Rahman, 33, were jailed for life last week after being caught by MI5 preparing an attack.
They shared at least 28 videos showing bloodshed and ‘martyrdom’ on Google’s YouTube platform. They were urging each other on to launch a suicide attack using a pipe bomb, meat cleaver and Samurai sword.
Some of the material was online for more than a year before being spotted and taken down. At least one of the videos, which includes a lecture by an extremist linked to hate preacher Anjem Choudary, was still on the platform last night.
Naweed Ali and Khobaib Hussain were convicted of plotting a knife attack on the streets of Britain
Mohibur Rahman made up the so-called ‘Three Muskateers’ [sic].
Tory MP Charlie Elphicke said: ‘Yet again this case underlines how video sharing giants need to take full responsibility in helping to win the war against terrorism.
‘It is extraordinary that these stayed up for several months and yet again it shows how YouTube needs to do more to stamp out extremism on their site.’
A YouTube video posted by Hussain featured an extremist preacher. Lasting 12 minutes and 55 seconds, it showed images of dead fighters, images of green birds to represent ‘martyrs’ in paradise and chilling music.
In comments on the video, Hussain spoke of martyrdom: ‘What else can we wish for?
‘We wish that our souls could be returned to our bodies so that we can be killed again.’
Video playing bottom right…
He criticised people for wanting to be British citizens instead of martyrs and said: ‘Every Muslim should want martyrdom, only a foolish person would not like it.’
Several of the videos were shared as part of a debate over whether the plotters should join Islamic State or Al Qaeda.
Rahman used the videos to radicalise a young relative. He sent him a YouTube film by the radical preacher Ahmad Musa Jibril, saying: ‘The intoxication of death will bring the truth.’
The video featured the story of a friend’s son who died in Syria apparently filming himself and praying out loud after he was shot. Rahman also posted to the relative a video by the preacher Abu Waleed about Osama Bin Laden.
The video was still on the site yesterday….
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Judge
Language
They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
“As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”
"You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
