I take issue with several things you have said in this post but I will only respond to the issue of my treatment of dmatic and then I am finished.
I have always tried to limit my comments and criticisms to what dmatic was saying and not make any comment about him personally and that is what I try to do with everyone here. And I don't disagree with your characterization of him as remaining polite in spite of my criticisms and I know I have commended him for that in the past.
The comment you keep referring to when I said that he will be held accountable to God for what he is saying was a reference to Rom 14:12 where it is clear that every believer will have to give an account of himself to God, me included. If you want to call that a personal attack, fine but that is a rare exception. If you don't believe that it is rare then take a look at the last two responses I made to dmatic in this thread, they are #141 and #147 on page 15.
In the first of those responses I strongly criticized his adding a word to a verse that wasn't included in the text and removing another word. But I made no comment whatsoever about him personally.
In the second response I was answering several questions he had asked me in a post. I took the time to answer each of those questions in detail and to the best of my ability and without any rancor, even though I am sure we have discussed those issues before. Once again, you won't find any personal attack on dmatic at all.
If you or anyone else interprets my criticism, sometimes severe, of what dmatic is saying to be an attack on him personally then you are mischaracterizing the situation.