So again, you judge Bro Meyer's entire sermon series, based on a short segment of the 1st sermon, out of 11.
Slander is a false tale or report about someone. If it's the truth, then it's not slander.
And btw, where is your thread about the pre-trib rapture being true? I couldn't find it.
If you knew someone was deceiving you, would you want someone to tell you, or just ignore it and believe the lies?
I believe that at the time, that was all the information brother Meyer had on it. He was a diligent researcher of information.Yes, Joseph Mede taught the rapture along with others as far back as the 300's AD. All that Meyer most likely did was read one of MacPherson's books and just accepted it as the truth without doing any other research.
The insinuation was so to me, but you like to play word games, to create doubt in other readers minds, to derail the thread, as it seems. Is that your intention?I didn't call those references "proofs" did I? They provide information that you can independently verify to find what the truth actually is.
Theirs a big difference in a flat earth video made by a kid, and a 22+ yr preacher of the gospel, explaining his findings on a doctrine he use to teach, but found crafty errors in it, and wanted to warn others about it.Yes, just listen to these recordings and it will explain everything. Very similar to what the people who believe the earth is flat say - "just watch this video and it will prove that the earth is flat". And when you watch the video you find out that it proves nothing. That is one of the crazy ideas I was talking about that had been "proven".
I did not say he explains 'everything'. From what research he did on scofield, he explains what he found out, to be important to the Christians who hold that man up in high regard, to this very day. He also goes into scripture to disprove what scofield taught.
A question: Do you believe the King James Bible is the infallible Word of God?
You wanted a summary of what was being taught in the sermons, and I gave it. Then you go on to ask for proof, and ignore listening to what the preacher had to say about the matter, because apparently you got your feelings hurt.Yes, you called Scofield a freemason and you can't produce any evidence that he actually was. And then based on that you confidently say he worshiped Satan. And when I searched the internet to try to find out if any of that was true I can find no facts which support those claims only unsupported speculation, innuendo, and guilt by association.
If that is what you call the truth about Scofield I want no part of it.
Brother Meyer shows how he was a freemason, by the people he associated with (Proverbs 13:20), and by perception. But you would have to listen to what he found out, to know this.
Brother Meyer knew well about witchcraft, because he was a witch before he came to Christ. He knew what to look for.
He had at least 1 freemason that turned to Christ, in his church, and received a lot of freemasonry material to research on. Also, the knowledge the ex-mason had in the craft(1st hand knowledge).
And btw, anyone who changes the Word of God, does worship satan by default. Your either in Christ, or in the World.
This all being said, why not be helpful to this thread and listen to the series, then make your findings, and be helpful, instead of devisive?
Otherwise, move on and let folks here listen for themselves and add equity to the thread, instead of trying to derail it.
ADD: Here is an interesting article on the biography of Joseph M Canfield, that wrote 'The incredible Scofield and his book'. It's eye opening, and shows the reason behind why he wrote the book to begin with.
An excerpt from Joseph M Canfield's(a baptist) biography:
(The highlighted words are by me, to point something out)
Is Scofield the man you want teaching you about the Bible?"Simply put, when a person begins to research this man, the most incredible facts begin to show up. At the outbreak of the American Civil War, Cyrus I. Scofield enlisted on May 20, 1861 in the Confederate Army and served with the 7th Regiment of the Tennessee infantry. Twelve years later Scofield committed perjury when he took an oath to become the United States District Attorney for Kansas and stated that he had never voluntarily born arms against the United States. (Liar)
Scofield did not last very long as a District Attorney, and by 1877, he was making a living on scams and writing bogus checks.(Thief) He was taken to court several times and even served jail time.
Prior to his time as a district attorney, Cyrus had married a Roman Catholic woman by the name of Leontine. They had two girls, Abigail and Helene. About the time he resigned as a district attorney, Cyrus abandoned his family, leaving his wife to support herself and their two girls(Infidel-1 Tim 5-8 ). Eventually the marriage was dissolved in divorce. Fundamental Christians are very hardnosed on divorce, and if a minister’s marriage ends in divorce, the minister will be forced to resign and barred from being in the ministry. Scofield’s supporters ignored this matter and kept it a secret for a long time in order to make Cyrus Scofield a licensed minister of the Gospel. While Cyrus was still legally married to Leontine, he began to date a young woman in his congregation by the name of Hettie Van Wark(Adulterer). They were married on March 11, 1884.
The Bible version that bears his name is a tainted version produced by two British clergymen, Westcott and Hort(satanists). These men are hailed as Bible scholars, but what is not brought out is the fact that both men were devoted Satanists and very active in occult rituals during their lifetime. The Devil must laugh his head off every time he thinks back on this coup. Think about it, the Fundamental Christians in the United States preach out of a Bible that Satan’s disciple’s doctored up and perverted. Here is a quote from page two of the Introduction to the 1945 Scofield Bible edition: “….The discovery of the Sinaitic MS, and the labours in the field of textual criticism of such scholars as …..Westcott and Hort, have cleared the Greek Textus Receptus of minor inaccuracies…..”(So the kjv and tyndales source of translations had error?)