Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: The Deep State Is The Deep Left State

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    20,861

    Default The Deep State Is The Deep Left State

    The Deep State Is The Deep Left State

    February 8, 2018 by CH


    A former FBI agent exposes the machinery of the Deep State which helps explain how so many American institutions become left-wing over time. It’s insightful, inasmuch as it’s crucial to know HOW we got to where we are, so that we can figure out a remedy.
    Former FBI Agent Jonathan Gilliam: Bureau’s Top Brass Climb Ladder by Ideology, Not Merit

    “Go in and think like a liberal” was the advice two FBI agents gave Jonathan Gilliam prior to his taking an FBI entrance exam. […]

    Gilliam, a retired Navy SEAL and former FBI special agent, spoke of left-wing political corruption across the federal government, specifically identifying the CIA and FBI.

    Gilliam recalled that two FBI agents advised him to “think like a liberal” during his FBI entrance exam. “I was told by two FBI agents that did not know each other – I was told, ‘Do not go in and take that test as though you are thinking like a SEAL.’ In other words, ‘If this happened, this is the way it should be done because this is the way a team works, and this is the way an investigation should be carried out.’ They said, ‘Don’t do that, you’ll fail. Go in and think like a liberal.’ And that’s what I did, and I passed.”
    Think like a liberal: “My grandson says he wishes he had brown eyes and brown skin! Please clap.”
    The FBI’s entrance exam illustrated how leftists use ideological filtering tools preferencing ideological fellow travelers, said Gilliam.

    “These tests are written to recruit a certain type of person,” said Gilliam. “So what you end up having when you do that is, you’re gonna have – the CIA has the same problem, where it’s not that they have individuals bringing a skill set to the table; it’s that they’re bringing an ideology to the table that those that wrote the test want them to have.”

    “The people who are like-minded, the people that get along are going to be the ones that stay there,” added Gilliam. “They’re not going to recruit people who don’t do what they do, who don’t think like they do.”
    This explains why the various bureaucracies are so top-heavy with leftoids while the rank and file are less ideological — the striver leftoids are the only ones getting promoted by the smug leftoids already in charge.

    Right wingers imo are simply more principled — or maybe more likable — than are Leftoids. The distinction shows up most clearly in employment practices, where righties seem to be constitutionally averse to ideology litmus tests to boost their ranks with those who share their worldview. Leftists otoh not only have no problem screening people for ideological conformity, they revel in it. They make it company policy. They set out to destroy those who depart from their ideology, no matter how small the particular point of disagreement.

    (Ironically, the smaller the point of disagreement, the more viciously the leftoid will lash out and accuse you of heresy. It’s really best to let it all hang out if you’re gonna disagree with a leftoid; you gain nothing by pussyfooting around the disagreement, and the leftoid will be driven to impotent catatonia and perhaps even submission if you disagree fundamentally and unapologetically.)
    The “deep state” network of leftists, said Gilliam, extends across various federal bureaucracies. He advised President Donald Trump to cleanse federal bureaucracies of politically corrupt leftists.
    The Chateau Word of the Year is….CULL. As in, #CullTheMedia, #CullTheFBI, #CulltheDeepState, #CullAcademia, #CullAdInfinitum. There’s a lot of institutional culling of leftoids to do, and so little time remaining to do it before it’s impossible. We aren’t gonna change hearts and minds, but we can change personnel.

    Culling can be accomplished many ways. There’s physical culling. Mass firings and what-not. (I’ll leave it as an exercise for the reader what “what-not” means, and when the time would be right for its use.) There’s preemptive culling. This would involve altering recruitment and promotion requirements and exams to rid them of ideological filtering. There’s legalistic culling. Expanding anti-discrimination civil rights laws to include political or ideological affiliation would be an example of that. Finally, there’s passive culling, which would be creating work environments hostile to liberals by, say, mandating a physical assessment day heavy on the tests of strength, or requiring attendance to a “Western Canon” seminar for every Diversity Seminar a company requires for its employees.

    President Trump, I know you’re reading. CULL. Remember this word. Drop it in your next tweet. I’d appreciate the shout-out.

    “If you want to see the deep state, this is what you’re looking at,” said Gilliam. “It’s not just the FBI. It’s not just the DOJ. It’s also the State Department. It’s the IRS. It’s the DOD. It’s the VA. You want to look across the board and look and all of these.”
    Bataan death march through the institutions.
    “I don’t think that what we’re seeing in the FBI is just about the FBI,” said Gilliam. “What we’re seeing … is that this is a slice of the bigger picture. Right now, the president has the greatest time that he’s probably going to have in his presidency to pull back and unleash either another special counsel or a team of investigators to go in and clean up these upper echelons [of federal bureaucracies].”
    I’m not a prayerful man, but I’ll say a prayer for Trump. His enemy is numerous, entrenched, and determined.
    “You can call them deep state. You can call them globalists. I often call them communists,” said Gilliam of left-wing federal bureaucrat careerists.
    The commie slur never goes out of style.
    Ideological alignment allows otherwise disconnected people across federal bureaucracies to cooperate absent conspiracy, said Gilliam, using terrorist networks as an illustration of this phenomenon.
    It’s a literal leftoid hivemind. They all think alike, so they proceed to the same goal without explicit direction. Such radical and independent thinkers, they are!
    “You know how terrorist cells work. They have a financial group that raises money, you have planners, you have people who build the bombs, and you have people that carry the operation out,” said Gilliam. “They may never meet those people, but they belong to the same ideology.”
    Inadvertently (perhaps), Gilliam has also addressed the JQ.

    The Globohomo Ministry of Propaganda, like its bureaucratic brethren in various state agencies, won’t change from within. Change has to be forced on it from without, and that necessarily means CLEANING SHOP of all the leftoid freaks that currently run the show.

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: You can chin-rub for ages over the nature of our national dissolution but the crux of the issue is that there are too many leftoids in positions of power. Remove them, and many of our problems go away with them.

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2018...ep-left-state/
    ”The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    113,807

    Default

    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    “As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”

    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    113,807

    Default

    File (hide): d3fefdc32bf3a5b⋯.jpg (660.23 KB, 2465x1435, 493:287, Awan connections debbie br….jpg) (h) (u)

    File (hide): b6cdeb866530469⋯.jpg (2.82 MB, 2816x4472, 352:559, Demorcrats Antifa ISIS.jpg) (h) (u)

    File (hide): 8debe9ca1ac77ca⋯.png (451.65 KB, 273x1917, 91:639, 1511061635616.png) (h) (u)
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    “As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”

    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,523

    Default

    Anecdote follows - had a high school friend that became an FBI agent. Talked with her about 20 years ago. Somehow-or-other, the conversation turned to personal weapons, and she said one of the most vacuous things I've ever heard anybody say. Something along the lines of, "All the republican agents like their guns, all the democratic agents don't."

    She worked some pretty important details during the 90s, and lived in the DC area for her entire career. In high school, she was smart, but in college drifted until getting a BS degree in psychology after nearly 7 years of college. The FBI said they'd hire her in a second if she got a law degree, so they paid for her to go to a pretty expensive school for two years. She graduated but DID NOT HAVE TO PASS THE BAR.

    Once in, she married another FBI agent who was retired military and clearly double-dipping. They had issues with having kids, and .gov paid for very expensive in-vitro treatments. She got almost TWO YEARS of leave to have the kids and associated treatments.

    All of her college time and kid and in-vitro time counted against her retirement.

    The FBI also counts military time against retirement in some formula. Basically her husband was eligible for full FBI retirement after only 10 years, thereby getting TWO federal pensions.

    PLUS, if you remain on reserves, you get the FULL military retirement after 30 years - and all that time counts as FBI time, too.

    No words.


    Earl
    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Withdraw consent!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NEMS
    Posts
    6,207

    Default

    In 1970 one had to have a degree in either Accounting, or Law to become an FBI agent. Just the degree, not passing the Bar, or the CPA testing. I went with accounting. Never made it to the FBI.

    Also any Civil Service Job can convert their military time. It's not special to the FBI. My dad spend 20 years in the military, and then worked for Civil Service for 10 retired with 30 years in CS. Not an FBI agent.
    Wise Men Still Seek Him

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    805

    Default

    In reality not true. In the 1960s, the FBI was also recruiting math/science grads to be agents -- both my dad and one of his brothers were science grads recruited into the FBI in the 1960s.

    Quote Originally Posted by CaryC View Post
    In 1970 one had to have a degree in either Accounting, or Law to become an FBI agent. Just the degree, not passing the Bar, or the CPA testing. I went with accounting. Never made it to the FBI.

    Also any Civil Service Job can convert their military time. It's not special to the FBI. My dad spend 20 years in the military, and then worked for Civil Service for 10 retired with 30 years in CS. Not an FBI agent.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,523

    Default

    Actually, he's right - to be an FBI "Special Agent" - you had to have a degree - usually in law. You could work for the FBI, but NOT be a "special agent."

    Also, I'm sorry, but being able to double count time for two different pensions is crazy. To be able to count two years of time-off toward a pension is ALSO crazy.


    Earl
    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Withdraw consent!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •