Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Laura Ingraham

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,076

    Default Laura Ingraham

    LeBron James is raking her big time now on NBA TV though he is refusing to mention her name.

    Anyone out here have any thoughts about Ingraham stating that James should just shut up and dribble.

    It doesn't appear Ingraham is gonna win this one at least in the basketball court of opinion.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    396

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DontTreadonMe7 View Post
    LeBron James is raking her big time now on NBA TV though he is refusing to mention her name.

    Anyone out here have any thoughts about Ingraham stating that James should just shut up and dribble.

    It doesn't appear Ingraham is gonna win this one at least in the basketball court of opinion.

    She is a professional outrage peddler simply doing what they do best - making money off of chumming the waters for their particular partisan base.

    "Winning" is measured by viewer ratings and corporate profits earned.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Back in Bluegrass Finally
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blacksprucy View Post
    She is a professional outrage peddler simply doing what they do best - making money off of chumming the waters for their particular partisan base.

    "Winning" is measured by viewer ratings and corporate profits earned.
    Some may have the same opinion of your posts.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,350

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountainbear View Post
    Some may have the same opinion of your posts.
    "They who have put out the people's eyes reproach them of their blindness."
    John Milton, 1642

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    7,750

    Default

    Laura Ingraham: Time for Mueller to Interview Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes and Maybe Even Barack Obama

    .@IngrahamAngle: "It's time for the special counsel to interview @HillaryClinton, @JohnKerry, Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes and maybe even @BarackObama. I say it's high time that we determine who really colluded with the Russians." pic.twitter.com/qHz3LUx8Be
    — Fox News (@FoxNews) February 17, 2018
    by Jeff Poor17 Feb 201811746
    Friday on Fox News Channel’s “The Ingraham Angle,” host Laura Ingraham gave her take on the indictments handed down by special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe regarding interference in the 2016 presidential election.
    Ingraham told viewers the indictments illustrated how Russia was still a threat to the United States despite then-President Barack Obama’s dismissal during the 2012 presidential election. She also said Mueller should interview 2016 Democratic Party presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State John Kerry, former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, former Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes and former President Barack Obama as part of his investigation.
    Partial transcript as follows:
    advertisement


    INGRAHAM: We finally have indictments in the Mueller investigation related to meddling in the 2016 election and the only ones being charged are Russians. A federal grand jury has now indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies for interfering in the 2016 election.
    They are charged with a bunch of things like creating fake ads, staging pro and anti-Trump campaign events and also setting up bogus-run organizations, but they’re not accused of rigging the election for Trump, but instead of waging information warfare to sow discord in the political system.
    Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein announced the indictments and added this important caveat.
    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
    ROD ROSENSTEIN, DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL: There is no allegation in this indictment that any American was a knowing participant in this illegal activity. There is no allegation in the indictment that the charge conduct altered the outcome of the 2016 election.
    (END VIDEO CLIP)
    INGRAHAM: Did you hear that? No American knowingly took part in the meddling and the plot had no effect on the outcome of the election. The facts, as we know them right now, support the president’s argument, an argument we have been making on this show for months, that there was no Russian collusion.
    Trump took a bit of a victory lap, tweeting today, “Russia started their anti-U.S. campaign in 2014, long before I announced that I would run for president. The results of the election were not impacted. The Trump campaign did nothing wrong. No collusion.”
    Well, it certainly looks that way, but we don’t know for sure what else Mueller may have up his sleeve. Though, I’ll tell you who this totally vindicates. Conservatives and Republicans who have been warning people for years about how devious the Russians can be in this situation.
    Remember, when President Obama sarcastically mocked Mitt Romney’s Russia warning back in 2012 during the presidential debate.
    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
    FORMER PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: When you’re asked what’s the biggest geopolitical threat facing America, you said Russia. Not al Qaeda, you said Russia. In the 1980s or now, calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the cold war has been over for 20 years.
    (END VIDEO CLIP)
    INGRAHAM: Now, Obama was so convinced of that, his DOJ and FBI did next to nothing about the Russian skulduggery. I love that word. His State Department actually approved the visas for the Russian operatives that were indicted by Mueller today.
    His FBI began spying on Trump Campaign Advisor Carter Page with a FISA warrant in the fall of 2016. Now details in today’s indictment do point to vindication for the Trump team. This is Jonathan Turley from tonight’s “Special Report.”
    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
    JONATHAN TURLEY: This makes more sense than the narratives that everyone has been throwing around in conspiracies. This began in 2014, began before the presidential election. The Russians were taking targets of opportunity and shooting at everybody in the election but certainly working more against Hillary Clinton. But what it does show is that they did a really quite impressive job in finding this cyber trail to these individuals.
    (END VIDEO CLIP)
    INGRAHAM: I’ll say. And the indictment describes rallies that took place after the election, both in support of and against Trump, and by the way, some of them happened on the same day, all allegedly promoted by these Russian accounts.
    You see this ad? Well, according to “Buzzfeed,” this anti-Trump rallies staged just four days after the election was promoted by something called “Black Matters U.S.,” a social media campaign thought to be organized by Russians.
    So, why would Trump collude with Russians to stage anti-Trump rallies? Does that make any sense? Here’s the bottom line. The Trump campaign did not know about Russian interference in the election. But the Obama administration certainly did and may have in fact enabled it.
    Given that we already know Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the DNC paid for that fake Russian dossier, it’s time for the special counsel to interview Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, and maybe even Barack Obama. I say it’s high time that we determine who really colluded with the Russians.

    http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/...-barack-obama/
    Europe used to have empires. They were run by emperors.
    Then we had kingdoms. They were run by kings.
    Now we have countries...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mountainbear View Post
    Some may have the same opinion of your posts.
    It's good to know that there are still optimists in this world.
    "See, in the last few years...we've stumbled... And when you stumble a lot, you...you start looking at your feet. We have to make people...lift their eyes back to the horizon and see the line of ancestors behind us saying, 'Make my life have meaning.' And to our inheritors before us saying, 'Create the world we will live in.' I mean, we're not just holding jobs and having dinner. We are in the process of building the future."

    Outbound

    The Frigid Times
    http://www.frigidtimes.blogspot.com/


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Back in Bluegrass Finally
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheSearcher View Post
    It's good to know that there are still optimists in this world.
    I'm an optimist when left alone.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    2,896

    Default

    She is gaining popularity and following. This is why the left is compelled to attack and attempt to destroy her.

    The question should be WHY is she becoming popular?
    “Blessed are those who, in the face of death, think only about the front sight.” Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,737

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DontTreadonMe7 View Post
    LeBron James is raking her big time now on NBA TV though he is refusing to mention her name.

    Anyone out here have any thoughts about Ingraham stating that James should just shut up and dribble.

    It doesn't appear Ingraham is gonna win this one at least in the basketball court of opinion.
    Sure appears as if James started the thing by trash talking Trump.

    She is correct, he should stick to something he knows.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,298

    Default

    I have always admired Laura Ingraham. She is a common sense conservative with a great gift of articulating the message in easy to understand terms. She wrote a book over 10 years ago titled "Shut Up and Sing". Basic premise of the book, and I suppose this rowe with LeBron, athletes and entertainers, keep to what you are good at and don't ruin it with leftist BS that we do not want to hear. Haven't watched her that much on TV, but she's good on the radio. During the campaign, she articulated what Trump was all about better than Trump did.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •