Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner's helicopter suffers engine trouble

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    113,807

    Default Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner's helicopter suffers engine trouble

    Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner's helicopter suffers engine ...Your browser indicates if you've visited this link

    Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner were traveling from Washington, DC, to New York by helicopter on Thursday when one of the helicopter's two engines failed.
    businessinsider.com/ivanka-trump-jared-kushners-helicopter

    First White Powder, now this.....
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    “As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”

    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Lapland, TN
    Posts
    13,403

    Default

    Meh, as long as the other one keeps on burnin and the bird is single engine capable ... if both had quit then I'd be concerned.

    O.W.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,628

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oscar Wilde View Post
    Meh, as long as the other one keeps on burnin and the bird is single engine capable ... if both had quit then I'd be concerned.

    O.W.
    Thats some great logic right there.
    If both had quit in flight they would be dead...lol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Lapland, TN
    Posts
    13,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maximilian View Post
    If both had quit in flight they would be dead...lol
    Nah.

    Aircraft don't require engines to land. Every glider landing, every space shuttle landing is /was a "dead stick".

    For motorized aircraft, if the engine(s) quit, there's no question, the aircraft is going to make an unplanned landing. It's then merely a matter selecting the least unsuitable landing area. One fella had multiple engines fail and let down in a river, might of been the Hudson, don't recall exactly. No loss of life and all things considered, minimal airframe damage.

    In fixed wing training, engine out landings are routinely practiced. In rotary wing, auto rotations are practiced. There is no reason to bust up an airplane or kill anyone just because of a landing, unplanned or otherwise.

    Now in this instance a single engine failed but apparently this aircraft was single engine capable. Could have been pilot error but most likely the engine itself or one of it's accessory components failed, it happens.

    Now, had both motors quit it would be highly likely the fuel had been contaminated. All fuel has water in it and any pilot worth his / her wings or ground crew will take fuel samples and will continue to drain any detected water prior to flight.

    One engine is not going to fail due to fuel contamination, for there to have been enough contamination to flame out both engines, thus requiring an autorotation, would have to have been a deliberate act of sabotage ... and this would be cause for concern.

    Was this helpful lol?

    O.W.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    574

    Default

    Exactyly. If fuel was contaminated both would fail. Turbines are not bullet proof. Flying DC3's with 1820s on them will make you learn about god. Turbines are great but they take a shit every now and then.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •