Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: The Alinsky-ization of Brett Kavanaugh

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    20,861

    Default The Alinsky-ization of Brett Kavanaugh

    September 21, 2018

    The Alinsky-ization of Brett Kavanaugh

    By Rich Logis

    Republicans and conservatives are fond of referencing Chicago community organizer Saul Alinsky, but how many have read his body of work? I've always referred to Alinsky's secular agitator bible, Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, as the sequel to The Communist Manifesto. Published in 1972, shortly before Alinsky's death, Rules was a significant part of President Obama's and Hillary Clinton's political upbringings – although he more influenced Obama, who followed in Alinsky's community organizing footsteps in Chicago in the '80s.

    Alinsky's thirteen rules are effective. The first step to challenging them is actually recognizing them.
    Here's how Democrats and the DMIC (Democrat Media Industrial Complex) Alinsky-ized Brett Kavanaugh, in the lead up to, during, and after his U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings.
    1: "Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."
    Outnumbered 51-49, Senate Democrats know that the arithmetic isn't on their side. If the Democrats and Republicans each hold court along party lines, Kavanaugh is our next justice, thanks to the nuclear option employed by Kentucky senator Mitch McConnell last year to get Justice Neil Gorsuch confirmed.
    But a two-senator lead means the tie-breaking voter, Vice President Mike Pence, had better be on call when the roll call vote to confirm Kavanaugh is held. Democrats undoubtedly consider Republican senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, of Maine and Alaska, respectively, to be free agents, particularly over Roe v. Wade. Kavanaugh was relentlessly questioned by Democrats over abortion; the goal was to create doubt that Collins and Murkowski would vote to confirm him. If uncertainty exists, it's unlikely that Democrats from states President Trump won in 2016 will cross the aisle. If Democrats somehow secure 51 nays, we'll have the modern-day version of Borked: Kavanaughed.
    2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people."
    Alinsky wrote in Rules that "the issue is never the issue." The reason the Democrats were obsessed with the documents withheld by the president has nothing to do with the documents; it has to do with the fact that the Democrats on the Committee on the Judiciary were unwilling to have substantive legal discussions. Why? Simple: because Kavanaugh would have made the Democrats – several of whom are trained attorneys – look like first-day law school students. Having authored 307 opinions, from 2,700 cases, during his 12 years as a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals, along with dozens of speeches to law schools and legal groups, Kavanaugh's jurisprudence bona fides are not only rock solid, but also very public. There is zero we don't know about Kavanaugh's interpretive approach and acumen.
    3. "Whenever possible go outside the expertise of the enemy."
    I suspect that this rule guided The New York Times' and Associated Press's show-me-the-woman-and-I'll-show-you-the-crime expedition two months ago for the work emails of Kavanaugh's wife, Ashley, who was hired earlier this year as town manager of Chevy Chase, Md. The Times requested any emails that contained the words "gun," "abortion," "federalist" or "gay." Perhaps the Times believed that Mrs. Kavanaugh was fond of attending The Federalist Society lectures about concealed carrying lesbians who believe that abortion is creepy. The Times' request was a big dud; 85 pages of emails later, and, I'm sure, much to the newspaper's chagrin, nothing incriminating, and nothing about guns, abortion, gays, or federalists was discovered. The AP requested all of her work emails but hasn't yet reported on its findings.
    4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules."

    Though there weren't explicit questions about Kavanaugh's Catholic faith, he noted his work with Catholic Charities. This rule was the basis for California senator Cuckoo Kamala Harris's lie that Kavanaugh called birth control abortion-inducing drugs (have you noticed how often I've already written about abortion?). And here's the ACLU's predictable fear-mongering that Kavanaugh would usher in a theocratic oligarchy. In fairness, I'm not angry at the ACLU, because voting is a lot like any decision or purchase: it's done based on fear or greed.

    5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon."
    Kavanaugh has been in Washington for decades; he's what many of us would call an "establishment" figure. This has provided an opportunity for the DMIC to attack his establishment "elitism," which President Trump swore to reject by draining the swamp. The median household income of Kavanugh's ZIP code is $12,000 a month, his house cost $1.2 million to purchase, and Kavanaugh racked up tens of thousands of dollars in credit debt to buy Washington Nationals season tickets. As coach of one of his daughters' basketball teams, his moniker is "Coach K." If the nickname Coach K doesn't smack of elitism, I don't know what does. The DMIC showed no qualms in portraying Kavanaugh as an out-of-touch Beltway insider. Oh, yeah, and people will die if he's confirmed.
    6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."
    Democrats know that most of their voters are out for blood, and a "good tactic" was to inextricably link Kavanaugh to President Trump, an "unindicted co-conspirator," according to Harris and Connecticut senator Richard Blumenthal, due to the plea deal of Trump's former personal attorney, Michael Cohen.
    In the old days, Democrats weren't quite as politically loony as they currently are and were definitely more likable. Unlikability is a good tactic for the Democrats; the temperament of a justice is important, and the more unlikeable Democrats were in their questioning, the better the chances Kavanaugh would lose his cool. But alas, he kept his cool, especially during Harris's entrapping questions about possible conversations he had with Trump's lawyer's firm regarding the Mueller investigation. The Democrats tried to force Kavanaugh into the role of de facto spokesman for the president, but he was ready for them.
    7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag."
    I didn't watch every second of the hearings, but I watched more than 75 percent, and Democrats said Trump's name dozens of times. New Jersey senator Cory Booker handled Trump fatigue by putting on a theatrical production worthy of Broadway: Booker, whose claim to fame was interrogating Mike Pompeo about sodomy during his secretary of state confirmation hearings, dared his Republican colleagues to expel him from the Senate. As was expected, President George W. Bush's name popped up. Kavanaugh worked for Bush, and the implication is that Kavanaugh has always been associated with illegitimate presidents.

    8. "Keep the pressure on."
    This is one of the easier rules to follow, because specifics aren't necessary. Attorneys who litigate before the Supreme Court know to expect random barrages of questions, and the Democrats kept up the pressure by interrupting Kavanaugh dozens of times, not including the interruptions from protesters. The interruptions failed in knocking Kavanaugh off his game – same for the objections to the hearings, coordinated by Democrats.
    9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."
    If I had to pick one rule sold the hardest by Democrats, it's this one. The "threats" posed by Kavanaugh sound a lot like the threats posed by Robert Bork, nominated by President Reagan in 1982. Said Massachusetts senator Edward Kennedy:
    Bork's America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution[.]
    Of course, had Bork been confirmed, none of those things would have occurred. But that wasn't important; it was the "what if?" threat of those things. In Kavanaugh's case, workers will have zero rights, felons will own machine guns, and women will be forced into back-alley abortions and die.
    10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition."
    If Kavanaugh is confirmed, the Democrats will have lost the battle, but they will consider the larger war still winnable – especially considering that he's expected to be confirmed a month before the midterm elections. It was quite apparent which Democrats were thinking about running for president in 2020 (Harris and Booker) and which weren't (Partrick Leahy of Vermont). Those positioning themselves for a White House run will incorporate their self-aggrandizing "resistance" to Kavanaugh into their campaigns.

    11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside."
    In the case of Kavanaugh, this is a slight overlap of Rule 1. Trump has gotten 60 federal judges confirmed, is reforming the Supreme Court to how the Founders envisioned it, and has 100 pending federal judicial appointments. These realities are red-meat selling points to Democrat voters: "Look at the havoc Trump has wrought! We must prevent him from further destruction!" Just how deep it will break into the counterside remains to be seen, but desperation is all Democrats have left (although projected demographics, if not engaged, don't bode well for America First).
    12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."
    To have a chance of winning long-term political battles, there must be self-immolation and sacrificial lambs within the Democratic Party ranks. Adaptation is key. This is already underway, as evidenced by the rise of "democratic socialist" primary winners nationwide. In America, Leninism has always been implemented in creeping doses, until one day, it's mainstream. The constructive alternative will continue to be the message that overt, out-in-the-open socialism is necessary to prevent future Brett Kavanaughs.
    13. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it."
    In Clintonian fashion, the Democrats will persist. Remember: Kavanaugh can't prove he's not racist, or that he won't vote to send abortion battles back to the states, where they belonged in the first place. The Democrats will continue to color Kavanaugh identically to how we describe Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor: as an untrustworthy judge who legislates from the bench.

    My prediction: Kavanaugh will receive 54 votes to confirm, with Collins and Murkowski unlikely to defect.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...kavanaugh.html
    ”The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fly-over country
    Posts
    8,189

    Default

    It's a shame that what he did as a 17-year-old has taken the spotlight completely off of the many other reasons why he should not be confirmed to a lifetime seat on the SCOTUS.

    The struggle over Kavenaugh is drawing the attention of women not part of Trump's base but who nevertheless voted for him in 2016. Not part of the base and already more than a little creeped out about what kind of president Trump is turning out to be and who's enabling him. Being a devotee of Trump in the primary phase of the mid-terms may have helped those loyalists get the nomination of their party but being so tied to Trump in the context of the general may be a liability.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Sanctuary
    Posts
    14,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    It's a shame that what he did as a 17-year-old has taken the spotlight completely off of the many other reasons why he should not be confirmed to a lifetime seat on the SCOTUS.

    The struggle over Kavenaugh is drawing the attention of women not part of Trump's base but who nevertheless voted for him in 2016. Not part of the base and already more than a little creeped out about what kind of president Trump is turning out to be and who's enabling him. Being a devotee of Trump in the primary phase of the mid-terms may have helped those loyalists get the nomination of their party but being so tied to Trump in the context of the general may be a liability.

    Green Man said:

    It's a shame that what he did as a 17-year-old...
    What exactly did he do as a 17 year old? Not what someone has accused him of, but what do you know he has done?
    Pastor Guest

    Free E- Book!

    "Steps Toward the Mark of the Beast"
    The Christian's Guide to the How and Why of
    the Coming Cashless/RFID Economic System


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Sanctuary
    Posts
    14,752

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    The struggle over Kavenaugh is drawing the attention of women not part of Trump's base but who nevertheless voted for him in 2016. Not part of the base and already more than a little creeped out about what kind of president Trump is turning out to be and who's enabling him. Being a devotee of Trump in the primary phase of the mid-terms may have helped those loyalists get the nomination of their party but being so tied to Trump in the context of the general may be a liability.
    Anyone who has a sense of right and wrong is outraged at what is being done to Judge Kavanaugh. I know a lot of women who have a very strong sense of what is right and wrong.
    Pastor Guest

    Free E- Book!

    "Steps Toward the Mark of the Beast"
    The Christian's Guide to the How and Why of
    the Coming Cashless/RFID Economic System


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Partisan, Region 1: Occupied Territories
    Posts
    13,915

    Default

    From a legal context this situation's alarming at best.

    Kavenaugh was vetted by the FBI 6 times already. If this can happen to a guy like him how do you think we'd fare in a similar situation?
    Remember the Prepper's Motto: "Panic early and avoid the rush!"
    Everything I post is Fiction and shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone.
    88 = Heil Hitler


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The Agora
    Posts
    1,961

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    It's a shame that what he did as a 17-year-old has taken the spotlight completely off of the many other reasons why he should not be confirmed to a lifetime seat on the SCOTUS.

    The struggle over Kavenaugh is drawing the attention of women not part of Trump's base but who nevertheless voted for him in 2016. Not part of the base and already more than a little creeped out about what kind of president Trump is turning out to be and who's enabling him. Being a devotee of Trump in the primary phase of the mid-terms may have helped those loyalists get the nomination of their party but being so tied to Trump in the context of the general may be a liability.
    it's a small sample but the women I know are NOT swayed ONE BIT by the obvious dirty democrat tactic.
    "All will be well!"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    113,807

    Default But Wait; There's More!

    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    “As a general rule, the earlier you recognize someone is trying to kill you, the better off you’ll be.”

    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."



  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    7,746

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    It's a shame that what he did as a 17-year-old has taken the spotlight completely off of the many other reasons why he should not be confirmed to a lifetime seat on the SCOTUS.

    The struggle over Kavenaugh is drawing the attention of women not part of Trump's base but who nevertheless voted for him in 2016. Not part of the base and already more than a little creeped out about what kind of president Trump is turning out to be and who's enabling him. Being a devotee of Trump in the primary phase of the mid-terms may have helped those loyalists get the nomination of their party but being so tied to Trump in the context of the general may be a liability.
    Moron or Ahole which description best depicts you.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fly-over country
    Posts
    8,189

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pastor Guest View Post
    Green Man said:



    What exactly did he do as a 17 year old? Not what someone has accused him of, but what do you know he has done?
    Let me clarify. It's a shame that the accusations of bad or criminal behavior on the part of Kavanaugh and his innocence or guilt has taken the spotlight off of his expressed judicial philosophy that the POTUS is inviolate; may not even be investigated.

    That's preposporous. If a president cannot be investigated then the case for impeachment can't be developed so neither the House can investigate nor the Senate judge in an informed manner. There's a general legal principal, perhaps from english common law, that the accused cannot choose his own judge. It looks like that's what Trump is trying to do--protect himself from legal troubles that appear to be a little ways down the road.

    It's bad enough that corporations are now people but a president who is above the law is a bridge too far.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •