Andrew Napolitano: Wall Funding is Illegal

[DontTreadonMe7]

What's up with Faux News Napolitano. Couple of years ago, he was a liberty conservative type of guy. Now Dude is pissing me off more and more. Sounds like a liberal never Trumping RINO globalist. He belongs on CNN or another Trump hating network. Typical Faux News.

https://theweek.com/speedreads/81714...tano-skeptical

[The Cub]

Somebody got to him.

There is nothing he has to say, that I care to listen to.

[Miradus]

Has he changed? Or has he just stopped agreeing with you?

I never paid an enormous amount of attention to him, but he does seem to normally have a pretty solid legal mind.

Are you a person of solid moral character whose morals don't alter based on how convenient something is for you or whether or not your political opponent is "playing fair"? Do you stand your intellectual and moral ground, even when it's not popular?

I think most of you would be crying foul murder if Obama were doing some of what Trump is threatening to do (to be fair, he hasn't done it yet and it may very well be a bluff and a negotiating tactic). You'd be saying it's the end of the republic and calling him a dictator.

But when it's YOUR strongman you suddenly switched positions and LOVE a strongman executive power.

Did you know the original charter for the United States under the Articles of Confederation didn't even call for a president? They had an inherent distrust of national executives. The modern presidency is largely shaped by that criminal Andrew Jackson and his enormous seizures of executive power. Much of what we consider "normal", like veto power, was born out of what were considered usurpations of executive power at the time.

If Trump can call an "emergency" and use the military to build a wall, could not President Cortez declare a "medical emergency" and instruct all military institutions to immediately start providing free healthcare?

You don't want to let this genie out of the bottle. At least not any further than it already is.

[Rusty34]

He does have a good legal mind but it has become obvious to some of us that this is not the same Judge Napolitano as before his call to the woodshed over at FIXed News.

[merovingian]

He does have a good legal mind but it has become obvious to some of us that this is not the same Judge Napolitano as before his call to the woodshed over at FIXed News.

Yep, someone showed him a copy of his suicide note.

[Idaho Bullwinkle]

Illegal is not complying with the arbitrary commands of the Ruling Class.
The whole idea of an authoritarian Ruling Class is ridiculous.

The American Ruling Class created the condition in countries micromanaged by the American Ruling Class.
So, what is the difference between the people deliberately flown into this country by the American Ruling Class in the dead of
night from Middle Eastern countries and those coming across an arbitrary line on the ground from Central American countries?

[jed turtle]

Has he changed? Or has he just stopped agreeing with you?

I never paid an enormous amount of attention to him, but he does seem to normally have a pretty solid legal mind.

Are you a person of solid moral character whose morals don't alter based on how convenient something is for you or whether or not your political opponent is "playing fair"? Do you stand your intellectual and moral ground, even when it's not popular?

I think most of you would be crying foul murder if Obama were doing some of what Trump is threatening to do (to be fair, he hasn't done it yet and it may very well be a bluff and a negotiating tactic). You'd be saying it's the end of the republic and calling him a dictator.

But when it's YOUR strongman you suddenly switched positions and LOVE a strongman executive power.

Did you know the original charter for the United States under the Articles of Confederation didn't even call for a president? They had an inherent distrust of national executives. The modern presidency is largely shaped by that criminal Andrew Jackson and his enormous seizures of executive power. Much of what we consider "normal", like veto power, was born out of what were considered usurpations of executive power at the time.

If Trump can call an "emergency" and use the military to build a wall, could not President Cortez declare a "medical emergency" and instruct all military institutions to immediately start providing free healthcare?

You don't want to let this genie out of the bottle. At least not any further than it already is.

Do YOU know that the primary responsibility of the President under his oath to protect and defend the constitution is to protect and defend US? If, in his opinion, the best or perhaps only way to fulfill his responsibility is to declare a national emergency - necessitated by the lack of cooperation of the traitors in government- and “build the wall” , then perhaps he is actually fulfilling his divinely-appointed purpose for his existence.

[Rusty34]

So far it still looks like Trump was installed by God for His purpose because no weapon formed against him has hit its mark yet. It seems like every one has turned around and struck the enemy behind it instead.

[Miradus]

Well if we're going to throw around words like "divine appointment" and "installed by God" then it makes me wonder if I'd ever reach you with any rational argument at all.

You do realize that kings and emperors since the dawn of civilization have all claimed divine appointment and to be chosen by God? After the people accept that drivel for a few generations then those kings and emperors move up a notch and start claiming to BE God.

I don't know what's happened to this forum since Trump came on the scene. Otherwise rational people with a healthy distrust of government have thrown all their good sense out the window. "Divinely appointed" indeed.

[mikiekimi]

Has he changed? Or has he just stopped agreeing with you?

I never paid an enormous amount of attention to him, but he does seem to normally have a pretty solid legal mind.

Are you a person of solid moral character whose morals don't alter based on how convenient something is for you or whether or not your political opponent is "playing fair"? Do you stand your intellectual and moral ground, even when it's not popular?

I think most of you would be crying foul murder if Obama were doing some of what Trump is threatening to do (to be fair, he hasn't done it yet and it may very well be a bluff and a negotiating tactic). You'd be saying it's the end of the republic and calling him a dictator.

But when it's YOUR strongman you suddenly switched positions and LOVE a strongman executive power.

Did you know the original charter for the United States under the Articles of Confederation didn't even call for a president? They had an inherent distrust of national executives. The modern presidency is largely shaped by that criminal Andrew Jackson and his enormous seizures of executive power. Much of what we consider "normal", like veto power, was born out of what were considered usurpations of executive power at the time.

If Trump can call an "emergency" and use the military to build a wall, could not President Cortez declare a "medical emergency" and instruct all military institutions to immediately start providing free healthcare?

You don't want to let this genie out of the bottle. At least not any further than it already is.

Please stop making sense...you’ll scare the natives...