Originally Posted by solderguy
God's commandment is straightforward.
.
Banned
God's commandment is straightforward.
.
Banned
In the very same chapter (Leviticus 20) the God of Israel also established a death penalty for adultery and cursing one's parents, plus a whole bunch of other various sexual crimes. Why isn't there more concern about making sure secular laws are modeled on these divine statutes as well? If it comes to that, why didn't God establish some kind of penalty for lesbian sex, which is totally passed over? Is there something less offensive or harmful about girl-on-girl action?
Banned
We knew from the beginning what Trump thinks of God's Biblical law [Leviticus 20:13.]
Apparently Trump doesn't agree with the NT either [Romans 1:26-32.]
In his GOP nomination speech at the national GOP convention Trump said:
" As your president, I will do everything in my power to protect our LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of a hateful foreign ideology. "
.
Banned
In former times, Christian nations did pattern their laws after God's laws.
It should be obvious that today's godless humanistic nations spurn God's Biblical laws and do the exact opposite of what God commanded.
It should also be obvious that modern society has gone to degenerate hell because ot it.
Romans 1:26-32
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
.
Esquire
No offense, but you really need to study some history. It's full of wars, violence, famines, diseases, child mortality, torture, serfdom, and slavery.
Back in the 14th century, Europe was thrashed by the 100 years war, maybe 1/3 died of the Black Death, there were two rival Popes calling each other the AntiChrist, and flagellants went town-to-town whipping themselves bloody begging God to forgive mankind for its sins.
Modern times are are a relative paradise. No war between first world countries in 74 years. Death from childbirth at an all time low. Deadly diseases completely or mostly wiped out. Violent crime way down. Strong laws protecting even children and animals. Religion free from government interference. And tons of scientific information freely available for anyone who feels closer to God after studying His creations.
https://www.ted.com/talks/steven_pin...at_the_numbers
Banned
You view history through the distorted prism of modern degenerate secular humanist society.
True students of history know that history is constantly being rewritten and reinterpreted by those who control the present.
This is why when I was in college one of my history courses was learning history from the perspective of those who lost the "war" [cultural or military] that allowed the "winners" to rewrite/reinterpret history.
As Orwell wrote in his prophetic novel 1984
Who controls the past controls the future.
Who controls the present controls the past.
In Orwell's 1984, the main character, Winston's, job was to literally rewrite history. How much easier Winston's job would be today with the invention of the internet.
This is also why there is a recent rush to destroy the last remnants of White Christian heritage [in Europe and North America] like Confederate symbols and memorials. Globalists who now control the multi-racial, multi-religious, multi-cultural present want to reshape the past in their own image.
.
Last edited by KingsX; 02-22-2019 at 04:31 AM.
Land Owner
Many of the topics discussed here on the Tree ultimately come down to this fact, Kingsx. Your observation applies to most subjects put out by the MSM. I accept the idea that we need to evolve or modify our culture as a society/civilization. However, one purpose of accurate history, is to teach members of the population the historical facts, not the globalist propaganda based on the current (last 100 years) of the Progressive Humanist manifesto.
Senator
Agreed and good points, Kingsx and pc-not.
The battle for dominion is as old as man....or much older.
Dominion over man; dominion over land; dominion over choice, thought, knowledge, souls...rights.
The deception runs deep and the Enemy has had ample time to perfect that deception to near perfection.
Like the Tower of Babel, that false sense of utopia they mention above will be shattered to the four winds, and the Enemy will shortly revel in the vast destruction.....shortly.
Esquire
No, no "mandatory treatment".
Just stop glorifying it as some sort of normal, acceptable behavior. Everywhere you turn, it is deemed as "acceptable" now. Media, the Net, advertising, "mainstream" churches.
There used to be a stigma attached to it, and for good reason. It is adherent behavior that benefits no one and harms the person suffering from it.
It should be no different than how we deal with some who is into cutting or other self-harming behaviors. Show compassion, but also show it can be treated.
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here." Captain John Parker, to his Minute Men on Lexington Green, April 19 , 1775.
Esquire
All I'm getting out of this is blanket statements, persecution complexes, and desire for Americanized Sharia Law.
First of all, a lot of the founding fathers were humanists who believed in freedom of religion. Jefferson didn't want adulterers executed, he wanted some interracial party time with Sally Hemmings. Still did impressive things in spite of that.
Second, I'm on the west coast and no one ever talks about the Civil War, monuments, or white heritage, it means absolutely nothing to us. Think about it, you're wound up about stuff most your countrymen couldn't care less about.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote