Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 5G Danger: Hundreds Of Respected Scientists Sound The Alarm About Health Effects

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,784

    Default 5G Danger: Hundreds Of Respected Scientists Sound The Alarm About Health Effects

    5G Danger: Hundreds Of Respected Scientists Sound The Alarm About Health Effects As 5G Networks Go Up Nationwide

    May 19, 2019 by Michael Snyder


    Even though many in the scientific community are loudly warning about the potential health effects that 5G technology could have on the general population, Verizon and AT&T are starting to put up their 5G networks in major cities all across the nation. Today, the total number of cell phones exceeds the entire population of the world, and the big cell phone companies are making a crazy amount of money providing service to all of those phones. And now that the next generation of cell phone technology has arrived, millions of cell phone users are looking forward to better connections and faster speeds than ever before. In fact, President Trump says that 5G networks will be up to 100 times faster than the current 4G networks that we are using right now…
    5G will be as much as 100 times faster than the current 4G cellular networks. It will transform the way our citizens work, learn, communicate, and travel. It will make American farms more productive, American manufacturing more competitive, and American healthcare better and more accessible. Basically, it covers almost everything, when you get right down to it. Pretty amazing.
    And just as 4G networks paved the way for smartphones and all of the exciting breakthroughs — they made possible so many things — this will be more secure and resilient. 5G networks will also create astonishing and really thrilling new opportunities for our people — opportunities that we’ve never even thought we had a possibility of looking at.

    Sounds great, right?

    But in order to achieve such vastly superior performance, 5G networks will use technology that is completely different from 4G networks.
    5G waves are “ultra high frequency” and “ultra high intensity”, but they are also easily absorbed by objects such as buildings and trees. So although cell towers will be much, much smaller, but they will also have to be much, much closer together than before. According to CBS News, it is estimated that the big cell phone companies will be putting up at least 300,000 of these small towers, and it has been projected that it will cost hundreds of billions of dollars to fully set up the 5G network nationwide.

    Needless to say, there is a tremendous amount of money at stake, and the big cell phone companies are trying very hard to assure everyone that 5G technology is completely safe.

    But is it?

    Today, there is a growing body of scientific evidence that indicates that the electromagnetic radiation that we are constantly being bombarded with is not good for us. Hundreds of scientists that are engaged in research in this area have signed the “International EMF Scientist Appeal”, and this is how that document begins…
    We are scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF). Based upon peer-reviewed, published research, we have serious concerns regarding the ubiquitous and increasing exposure to EMF generated by electric and wireless devices. These include–but are not limited to–radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitting devices, such as cellular and cordless phones and their base stations, Wi-Fi, broadcast antennas, smart meters, and baby monitors as well as electric devices and infra-structures used in the delivery of electricity that generate extremely-low frequency electromagnetic field (ELF EMF).

    In the next paragraph, we are told that “cancer risk”, “genetic damages”, “functional changes of the reproductive system”, and “neurological disorders” are some of the health risks that have been discovered by the scientific research that has been conducted so far…
    Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.

    And remember, 5G technology is going to take all of this to an entirely new level.

    Because the 5G towers are going to be so powerful and so close together, it will essentially be like living in a closed radiation chamber 24 hours a day.

    Over in Israel, one scientist has discovered that the surface of the human body actually draws in 5G radiation “like an antenna”
    What’s further disturbing about 5G radiation is how the human body responds to and processes it. Dr. Ben-Ishai from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem discovered as part of a recent investigation that human skin acts as a type of receptor for 5G radiation, drawing it in like an antenna.
    “This kind of technology, which is in many of our homes, actually interacts with human skin and eyes,” writes Arjun Walia for Collective Evolution about the study.
    “… human sweat ducts act like a number of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths that are put out by the devices that employ 5G technology,” he adds.

    In other words, our bodies are essentially magnets for 5G radiation.

    So will it be worth it?

    Will you be willing to risk your life in order to have better connections and faster speeds?

    Sure, your phone will be more useful than ever before, but there is also the possibility that you could get cancer. Even the American Cancer Society acknowledges the risk…
    A recent large study by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) exposed large groups of lab rats and mice to RF energy over their entire bodies for about 9 hours a day, starting before birth and continuing for up to 2 years (which is the equivalent of about 70 years for humans, according to NTP scientists). The study found an increased risk of tumors called malignant schwannomas of the heart in male rats exposed to RF radiation, as well as possible increased risks of certain types of tumors in the brain and adrenal glands.

    Of course all previous studies have been done on existing cell phone technology.
    No studies have been done on the health effects of our new ultra-powerful 5G technology, and this has many scientists extremely concerned.
    Dr. Martin Pall, a PhD and Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University, says that rolling out 5G without any safety testing whatsoever “has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world”.

    Unfortunately, there is no organized opposition and 5G networks are going up all over the country right now.

    So it won’t be too long before you are being bombarded by “ultra high frequency” and “ultra high intensity” cell phone radiation wherever you go, and most people won’t even realize what is happening.

    And if you do get sick, the cell phone companies sure aren’t going to pay the bill.

    http://endoftheamericandream.com/arc...-up-nationwide
    ”The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    1,706

    Default

    With the transition to a new networking technology, some familiar scare stories are reemerging. You might even have seen a few in the comments here. “5G will give you cancer,” “mmWave technology leads to brain tumors,” and “smartphones are microwaving our bodies,” or so the stories go.
    It’s all hogwash.
    Many of the persistent myths about cell tower radiation still hang over the industry from as far back as the 2G days. Many are wrongly concerned about the dangers even faster 5G technologies. Let’s examine the leading studies and some of these persistent rumors to put your mind at ease about the safety of mobile technology.
    Understanding radiation

    Radiation probably makes you think about waste hazards and nuclear bombs. While that’s fair, there are plenty of very safe forms of radiation. In fact, we’re constantly bathing in background radiation, like cosmic rays from the sun.
    There’s a major difference between safe radiation and the bad type associated with places like Chernobyl or X-ray machines. This is the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Ionizing radiation appears at wavelengths above ultraviolet light, aka X-rays and gamma rays. These can damage your DNA by knocking electrons out of the base molecules, leading to tumors and cancer.





    Lower frequency radio waves, like what’s used for LTE mobile networks, are non-ionizing — they can’t cause the same type of damage. Certain non-ionizing wavelengths can still be bad for you, as they produce heat at extremely high power level. Your microwave can warm up some nasty TV dinners just fine, but it requires more than a thousand watts of power to do so.
    The FCC’s safe limit for mobile phones is a specific absorption rate (SAR) of 1.6 watts per kg (1.6 W/kg) of mass, nowhere near enough to warm up your body. Smartphones marketed in the U.S. must demonstrate compliance with this limit before they go on sale. ICNIRP guidelines used in Europe and most other countries set this limit at around 2.0 W/kg. These are the absolute legal limits of exposure. Most of the time the real-world values are significantly lower, especially when we put our phones down.

    There have been no conclusive results indicating mobile technologies are eminently dangerous to humans, many astroturfers rely on how difficult it is to contextualize scientific results to make wild claims that go unchecked for a long time. In particular, they often cite one specific study as “proof” for their misinformation.

    ...you will never be exposed to the amount of RF EMR in this study.
    The US National Toxicology Program (NTP)


    In 2016, the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) released draft findings of studies examining the effects of non-ionizing radiation on rats and mice. Several populations establish a control group, with males exposed to either CDMA or GSM cellphone radiation, and females exposed to GSM cellphone radiation. That’s 2G rather than modern 4G. Researchers applied the following exposure protocol to test the animals:

    • Rats and mice were exposed to GSM or CDMA signals with whole-body exposures of zero to 15 W/kg (rats were given a lower dose).
    • Exposure was initiated in utero.
    • All exposures applied 7 days a week, for about 9 hours a day.
    • A single, common group of unexposed rats or mice of each sex served as controls.
    After two years, the study found several rats and mice exhibited tumors. However, these results mostly concerned full body exposure rather than partial-body exposure for humans. There also weren’t adequate controls for exposure uniformity, making it tough to tell exactly how much exposure each rat actually received.
    However, it is important to remember a few rats getting tumors when exposed to between two and four times the allowed limit (1.6W/kg) of RF EMR for cellphones does not constitute proof of anything. You will never be exposed to the amount of RF EMR used in this study. With the mice, they used ludicrously high power levels — up to 10W/kg for 2-year studies and 15W/kg for short-term ones. All test groups actually had higher survival rates than the control groups, illustrating how correlation is not causation.

    https://www.androidauthority.com/5g-dangers-895776/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    teh intarweb
    Posts
    3,966

    Default

    After two years, the study found several rats and mice exhibited tumors.
    Hello?
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell



    Police dog 1, bad guy nothin':

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    1,706

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bear View Post
    Hello?
    Why didn't you Add the following?

    However, these results mostly concerned full body exposure rather than partial-body exposure for humans. There also weren’t adequate controls for exposure uniformity, making it tough to tell exactly how much exposure each rat actually received.
    Once again falsified findings for those doom and gloomers to grasp onto. Like always. LOL

    So many are imitating just what the Media does ONLY put what interests them and not the Whole story.~!!!!!!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    teh intarweb
    Posts
    3,966

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoppalong View Post
    Why didn't you Add the following?


    Once again falsified findings for those doom and gloomers to grasp onto. Like always. LOL

    So many are imitating just what the Media does ONLY put what interests them and not the Whole story.~!!!!!!
    Well, mostly because it’s an irrelevant attempt at ameliorating the obvious stake through the heart of the premise.
    if Rf causes tumors in rats after 2 years what do you think it’s doing to you?

    Unlike studies involving drugs, where it can be argued the harm to the rat was due to its biological differences with humans, etc, harm caused by radiation is much more difficult to rationalize away.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell



    Police dog 1, bad guy nothin':

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,264

    Default

    Wife works for Verizon on the 5g program.
    Someone is spending big on this and it ain't the telecoms.
    5g will be the orwellian digital cage, and the powers behind it are hellbent on its implementation.

    Is it safe?
    Irrelevant.
    Europe used to have empires. They were run by emperors.
    Then we had kingdoms. They were run by kings.
    Now we have countries...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slave Region 10
    Posts
    62,825

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by merovingian View Post
    Wife works for Verizon on the 5g program.
    Someone is spending big on this and it ain't the telecoms.
    5g will be the orwellian digital cage, and the powers behind it are hellbent on its implementation.

    Is it safe?
    Irrelevant.
    They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease.
    "You think a wall as solid as the earth separates civilisation from barbarism. I tell you the division is a sheet of glass."
    John Buchan, 1st Baron Tweedsmuir of Enfield (1875-1940): Author and Diplomat

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •