Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Trump Had Right to Withhold Ukraine Funds: GAO is Wrong

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    teh intarweb
    Posts
    4,255

    Default Trump Had Right to Withhold Ukraine Funds: GAO is Wrong

    Trump Had Right to Withhold Ukraine Funds: GAO is Wrong

    by Alan M. Dershowitz
    January 17, 2020 at 7:00 pm




    Share461

    • The Constitution allocates to the president sole authority over foreign policy (short of declaring war or signing a treaty). It does not permit Congress to substitute its foreign policy preferences for those of the president.
    • To the extent that the statute at issue constrains the power of the president to conduct foreign policy, it is unconstitutional.
    • Even if the GAO were correct in its legal conclusion — which it is not — the alleged violation would be neither a crime nor an impeachable offense. It would be a civil violation subject to a civil remedy, as were the numerous violations alleged by the GAO with regard to other presidents.
    • If Congress and its GAO truly believe that President Trump violated the law, let them go to court and seek the civil remedy provided by the law.


    The Constitution allocates to the president sole authority over foreign policy... It does not permit Congress to substitute its foreign policy preferences for those of the president. (U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Wikipedia Commons)

    U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) has gotten the constitutional law exactly backwards. It said that the "faithful execution of the law" — the Impoundment Control Act—"does not permit the president to substitute his own policy priorities for those congress has enacted into law ." Yes, it does — when it comes to foreign policy. The Constitution allocates to the president sole authority over foreign policy (short of declaring war or signing a treaty). It does not permit Congress to substitute its foreign policy preferences for those of the president.

    To the extent that the statute at issue constrains the power of the president to conduct foreign policy, it is unconstitutional.

    Consider the following hypothetical situation: Congress allocates funds to Cuba (or Iran or Venezuela). The president says that is inconsistent with his foreign policy and refuses to release the funds. Surely the president would be within his constitutional authority. Or consider the actual situation that former President Barack Obama created when he unilaterally made the Iran deal and sent that enemy of America billions of dollars without congressional approval. I do not recall the GAO complaining about that presidential decision, despite the reality that the Iran deal was, in effect, a treaty that should require senate approval that was never given.

    Whatever one may think about the substantive merits of what President Donald Trump did or did not do with regard to the Ukrainian money— which was eventually sent without strings —he certainly had the authority to delay sending the funds. The GAO was simply wrong in alleging that he violated the law, which includes the Constitution, by doing so.

    To be sure, the statute requires notification to Congress, but if such notification significantly delays the president from implementing his foreign policy at a time of his choice, that too would raise serious constitutional issues.

    Why then would a nonpartisan agency get it so wrong as a matter of constitutional law. There are two obvious answers: first, in the age of Trump there is no such thing as nonpartisan. The political world is largely divided into people who hate and people who love President Trump. This is as true of long term civil servants as it is of partisan politicians. We have seen this with regard to the FBI, the CIA, the Fed and other government agencies that are supposed to be nonpartisan. There are of course exceptions such as the inspector general of the Department of Justice who seems genuinely non-partisan. But most civil servants share the nationwide trend of picking sides. The GAO does not seem immune to this divisiveness.

    Second, even if the GAO were non-partisan in the sense of preferring one political party over the other, it is partial to Congress over the president. The GAO is a congressional body. It is part of the legislative, not executive, branch. As such, it favors congressional prerogatives over executive power. It is not surprising therefore that it would elevate the authority of Congress to enact legislation over that of the president to conduct foreign policy.

    In any event, even if the GAO were correct in its legal conclusion — which it is not— the alleged violation would be neither a crime nor an impeachable offense. It would be a civil violation subject to a civil remedy, as were the numerous violations alleged by the GAO with regard to other presidents. Those alleged violations were barely noted by the media. But in the hyper-partisan impeachment atmosphere, this report received breathless "breaking news" coverage and a demand for inclusion among the articles of impeachment.

    If Congress and its GAO truly believe that President Trump violated the law, let them go to court and seek the civil remedy provided by the law. But let us not continue to water down the constitutional criteria for impeachment by including highly questionable, and on my view wrongheaded, views about violations of an unconstitutional civil law.

    Alan M. Dershowitz is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law Emeritus at Harvard Law School and author of the book, Guilt by Accusation: The Challenge of Proving Innocence in the Age of #MeToo, Skyhorse Publishing, November 2019. He is a Distinguished Fellow at Gatestone Institute.

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/1...e-funds-gao-is

    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell



    Police dog 1, bad guy nothin':

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5,339

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,715

    Default

    Is anything the demoncrats say the truth?
    Europe used to have empires. They were run by emperors.
    Then we had kingdoms. They were run by kings.
    Now we have countries...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Posts
    4,769

    Default

    It's completely ridiculous that they can claim that Trumps thoughts broke the law. The money was paid on time. If he didn't pay it at all, he simply had to send a letter to Congress in 15 days.

    Trump should drag the sob who wrote this to testify.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    teh intarweb
    Posts
    4,255

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by merovingian View Post
    Is anything the demoncrats say the truth?
    Unless there is a punitive response, they will continue to obfuscate the truth.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell



    Police dog 1, bad guy nothin':

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3,811

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by naturallysweet View Post
    It's completely ridiculous that they can claim that Trumps thoughts broke the law. The money was paid on time. If he didn't pay it at all, he simply had to send a letter to Congress in 15 days.

    Trump should drag the sob who wrote this to testify.
    The 'sob' that wrote this is on Trump's legal team.



    Earl
    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Withdraw consent!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •