Researchers Retract Botched Anti- Hydroxychloroquine Study (Was Used To Attack Trump)
Researchers Retract Botched Anti- Hydroxychloroquine Study Which Was Used To Attack Trump
by Tyler Durden
Thu, 06/04/2020 - 15:53
An influential study which found anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine raised the risk of cardiac issues has been retracted by its three authors.
The study, published on May 22 in the UK's prestegious Lancet medical journal, relied on bogus data from a company called Surgisphere, which would not transfer the full dataset for an independent review, and "can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources."While the company that produced the original data, Surgisphere Corp., had signaled that it would cooperate with an independent review, it ultimately reneged and said doing so would violate confidentiality agreements, wrote the study authors. “As such, our reviewers were not able to conduct an independent and private peer review,” the authors said. -BloombergNotably, the World Health Organization halted trials of the drug, only to reverse course after the Lancet issued a major disclaimer regarding the study.
World Health Organization (WHO) ✔ @WHO
· Jun 3, 2020
Replying to @WHO
"This decision was taken as a precaution while the safety data were reviewed.
The Data Safety and Monitoring Committee of the Solidarity Trial has been reviewing the data"-@DrTedros #COVID19 https://twitter.com/WHO/status/1268212018802237441?s=20 …
World Health Organization (WHO) ✔ @WHO
Replying to @WHO
"As you know, last week the Executive Group of the Solidarity Trial decided to implement a temporary pause of the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial, because of concerns raised about the safety of the drug"-@DrTedros #COVID19
"On the basis of the available mortality data, the members of the committee recommended that there are no reasons to modify the trial protocol"-@DrTedros #COVID19
69
12:05 PM - Jun 3, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
50 people are talking about this
It wasn't just the WHO who used it to knock HCQ either - as the study was heavily relied upon by the left to mock President Trump for taking the drug.
Sean Davis
✔ @seanmdav
The entire study was fake. Congratulations on using garbage science from con artists to scare sick people away from potentially life-saving treatment. Hope the dank anti-Trump burns were worth it. https://twitter.com/julianborger/status/1263819256682237953 …
Julian Borger
✔ @julianborger
Trump on hydroxychloroquine, April 4: "What do you have to lose? Take it."
The Lancet: https://twitter.com/EricTopol/status...11764287725574 …
3,922
3:33 PM - Jun 4, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,901 people are talking about this
"We all entered this collaboration to contribute in good faith and at a time of great need during the Covid-19 pandemic," said the authors. "We deeply apologize to you, the editors, and the journal readership for any embarrassment or inconvenience that this may have caused."
Joel B. Pollak ✔ @joelpollak
The Party of Science™ lied about science. https://twitter.com/TheLancet/status/1268613313702891523 …
The Lancet ✔ @TheLancet
Today, three of the authors have retracted "Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis" Read the Retraction notice and statement from The Lancet https://hubs.ly/H0r7gh50
1,620
3:51 PM - Jun 4, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
999 people are talking about this
Birx, Fauci, and the corrupt media who peddled this fake study from a washed-up sci-fi author and a cam girl owe the entire nation an apology. How many people died from lack of treatment because our nation's "experts" once again got duped by con artists??
1,506
3:20 PM - Jun 4, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy
1,111 people are talking about this
https://www.zerohedge.com/health/res...ho-halt-trials
Reply With Quote