Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Kenosha AG makes Bizarre Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse Friend

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    20,861

    Default Kenosha AG makes Bizarre Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse Friend

    Kenosha AG makes Bizarre Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse Friend

    Ammoland Inc. Posted on November 11, 2020 by Dean Weingarten


    Kenosha AG makes Bizarre Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse Friend U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)-

    Dominick Black, of Kenosha, Wisconsin, has been charged by the Kenosha AG with a non-existent crime, for what appears to be political purposes. The crime is supposedly giving a gun to a person under the age of 18, which resulted in a death.

    Fortunately for Dominick Black, there are clear exceptions to the law. One of them is any person who is at least 16 years old, as long as they are not violating any of the three other laws, none of which apply in this case. From wisn.com:

    Dominick Black, of Kenosha, was charged with two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under the age of 18, causing death.
    A 19-year-old man has been charged with illegally buying a gun used to kill two protesters in Kenosha.
    Dominick Black, of Kenosha, was charged with two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under the age of 18, causing death.
    According to a criminal complaint, Black bought a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle on May 1 at Ladysmith Ace Home Center in Ladysmith, Wisconsin.
    Ladysmith is more than 300 miles from Kenosha.
    Prosecutors said Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, of Antioch, Illinois, gave Black the money used to buy the gun.
    The complaint said Black knew Rittenhouse was not legally able to buy the gun because he was not 18 years old.
    Black and Rittenhouse agreed to keep the gun at Black's stepfather's house in Kenosha, the complaint said.



    Screenshot from Wisconsin Court system, cropped and scaled by Dean Weingarten Black purchased the rifle on 1 May 2020. Kyle Rittenhouse will not reach 18 years of age until 3 January 2021.

    Another issue is whether Black violated federal law in purchasing a gun for someone else. It is illegal to purchase a gun for another person if you lie about it. But the gun was never transferred to Kyle Rittenhouse, because it was kept in Wisconsin, at Black's residence.

    It was legal for Kyle to possess the rifle. He could have purchased the rifle from a private seller in Wisconsin. He was not allowed to purchase a rifle from a Federal Firearms licensee until he reached the age of 18.

    There is no federal law prohibiting minors from possessing or owning long guns, only handguns.

    What is the basis for the Kenosha AG charges? There does not seem to be any. Kyle was not a prohibited possessor. The rifle was kept in Wisconsin, at the residence of the person who legally purchased it. What follows is speculation.

    Why charge a teenager with a non-crime in a spectacularly political case?

    One obvious reason is to apply pressure against that person in order for them to “co-operate” in the prosecution of another person. It is common practice in plea deals. It appears to be a favorite tactic of the Left, as seen in several recent cases in the Russian collusion investigation run by Robber Muller. Consider the non-crimes of General Flynn.

    Prosecutors have accumulated enormous power over the last several decades.

    The Supreme Court granted prosecutors absolute immunity for their actions. More and more prosecutors are abusing their power, often for political reasons.

    A person may be completely innocent, yet suffer enormous punishment, without ever being convicted of a crime. It appears to be happening in Kenosha.

    Michael Gravely, the Kenosha County District Attorney (an elected position), has been shown to have ties with Whitney Cabal, AKA Billy Violent. She is a known violence-inciting Black Lives Matter activist.

    https://www.ammoland.com/2020/11/ken...enhouse-friend
    ”The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    teh intarweb
    Posts
    5,665

    Default

    It would appear we all have this sort of lawfare to look forward to, as the written laws are ignored or leveraged in new ways to charge the innocent, and direct the cannon of government at we the people, instead of defending us.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell



    Police dog 1, bad guy nothin':

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,356

    Default

    well said mr. bear, well said

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fly-over country
    Posts
    8,189

    Default

    Some "friend" that would make a straw purchase for a 17-year-old.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,737

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    Some "friend" that would make a straw purchase for a 17-year-old.
    This is why Morons like you should be required to wear dunce caps.

    There was NO straw purchase, by any definition of any legislation.

    I DARE you to try and show us how it was such.

    C'mon smarter than thou, SHOW US.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fly-over country
    Posts
    8,189

    Default

    [COLOR=rgba(13, 13, 13, 0.9)]On May 1, Black purchased a rifle at Ladysmith Ace Home Center using money he was given by Rittenhouse, according to a criminal complaint from the Kenosha County District Attorney. Prosecutors stated that Black was aware Rittenhouse was 17 years old and not legally able to purchase a firearm.[/COLOR]
    https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loca...tings/2366748/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,737

    Default


    What part of that is a straw purchase?

    C'mon MORON, should us the LEGAL DEFINITION.

    My 3 year old could give you money to purchase an AR15, and if you retain possession until he is of legal age, no straw purchase has happened.

    That is PRECISELY what happened.

    Now SHOW YOUR WORK.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,737

    Default

    Still waiting oh great green slug,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Fly-over country
    Posts
    8,189

    Default

    The important part of the Wikipedia definition is good enough:

    A straw purchase or nominee purchase is any purchase wherein an agent agrees to acquire a good or service for someone who is unable or unwilling to purchase the good or service themselves, and the agent transfers the goods or services to that person after purchasing them.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,737

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Green Man View Post
    The important part of the Wikipedia definition is good enough:
    Beautiful, you DO understand that for it to be such, all components of the transgression must be true?

    "The agent transfers the goods or services to that person after purchasing them."

    Did not happen, thus no straw purchase. Jesus you are thick.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •