Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: There shouldn’t be a double standard for law & order

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    20,861

    Default There shouldn’t be a double standard for law & order

    There shouldn’t be a double standard for law & order: Devine

    By Miranda Devine
    February 21, 2021 | 9:43pm | Updated


    Attorney General nominee Merrick Garland speaking at a event on January 7, 2021.
    AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)



    In his confirmation hearing Monday, attorney general nominee Merrick Garland plans to tell the Senate his priority is domestic terrorism, and that he personally will supervise the prosecution of what he calls “white supremacists” who stormed the Capitol.

    It is disturbing that Garland is embracing the rancid lie that the Capitol riot was racially motivated, an uprising by “white supremacists” which rivalled the Islamist terror attack of 9/11 in which 3,000 people were slaughtered.

    This is Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s narrative, which she has driven with escalating hyperbole until it no longer resembles anything that happened on January 6.

    Every Republican has condemned the riot. At least 140 Capitol police were injured that day, including one officer who lost an eye, and others with brain injuries, according to police union chief Gus Papathanasiou.

    What happened was bad enough without the lies.

    No one is fooled by Pelosi’s feigned defense of law and order as she totters around the House in high dudgeon, as if she hadn’t already trashed every norm of American politics, using Trump’s unorthodox personality as an excuse.

    She crossed the Rubicon at the State of the Union last year, when she dramatically ripped up President Trump’s speech as she stood behind him.

    That single act of desecration incited more anger among conservatives than anything Trump had to say.

    “When she tore up the state of the union, they started this war,” says a relative of Richard Barnett, an Arkansas 60-year-old jailed over the riot, who placed one foot on what he thought was Pelosi’s desk in an act of reciprocal disrespect.

    Pelosi has no problem with violence, either, as long as it furthers her aims: “I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country. And maybe there will be,” she said in 2018 when railing against Trump.

    “People will do what they do,” she said at the height of the BLM-Antifa riots last July, when rioters ripped down a statue of Christopher Columbus and threw it in Baltimore’s Harbor.

    Of course, when you point out the hypocritical double standards of Pelosi and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris during last years’ riots you are mocked for “whataboutism.”

    But it matters. The Dems spent seven months fanning the flames of left-wing discord and violence. Then, when the worm finally turned, and right-wing violence flared one day in Washington, they morphed into law and order hawks scouring the country for unrepentant signs of conservatism.

    Almost everyone arrested around the country remains in jail over the riot, even if they committed no violence, have no criminal record, have stable jobs, are retirees or a mother and son duo.

    The only person released without bail is a left-wing anti-Trump activist, John Sullivan, who prosecutors say encouraged the violence that day, and was rewarded with $75,000 by CNN and NBC for his video footage.

    The aim is to bankrupt and destroy Trump supporters, most of whom can’t afford the legal fees. While top DC law firms raced to defend Guantanamo Bay inmates pro bono, the Capitol rioters are on their own.

    Having encouraged them to come to his “wild” DC rally January 6 on the promise that Biden’s victory would be overturned, Donald Trump has abandoned his jailed supporters.

    No one in Trump-world has offered to contribute to their legal fees from the millions of dollars his PAC collected after the election.

    MAGA will have its day in court eventually, after months in jail far from home, unlike the thousands of violent anarchists who created mayhem from coast to coast last year, injuring thousands of cops, burning down police stations and destroying small businesses.

    Most BLM-Antifa rioters were released without bail and had charges dropped.

    In New York more than 400 rioters and looters arrested in June were freed without bail.

    In Washington DC, in June, almost everyone charged with felony rioting was released from jail and later had the charge dropped.
    In Pennsylvania, when one judge set bail for rioters at $1 million, he was intimidated into reversing the decision after a mob marched on his house.
    In California, a district attorney reportedly requested prosecutors consider looters’ “needs” when deciding to press criminal charges.

    In Minneapolis, where it all began, anti-cop rioters were rewarded, as they were in New York, when the city council voted to defund the police. The city since has descended into hell of crime and disorder.

    As for Portland, Oregon, charges were dropped for 90 percent of rioters arrested in September’s anti cop violence. One 23-year-old charged with attempted murder, arson, possession of a destructive device, and rioting was released on a $1,000 bond.

    Seattle was as bad. Mayor Jenny Durkan lauded the lawlessness that would lead to the fatal shooting of 19-year-old Horace Lorenzo Anderson in July as a “summer of love.”

    These were the deadly protests Biden benignly described as “peaceful” and Harris said are “not going to stop . . . and they should not.”

    Yet after a few hours of madness one day in January, every Trump supporter in the country is to be treated as if they flew a plane into the World Trade Center. They all are under suspicion for what Biden said last week was “the greatest threat . . . in America: domestic terror.”

    He also smeared “former military, former police officers” as responsible for “the growth of white supremacy.”

    Fine. If Biden has decided we are to become a zero-tolerance law and order nation, there are advantage in a crime-free society if you don’t mind writing off everyone who makes a mistake.

    But in reality, we are doing the opposite, creating a two-tier justice system that punishes only the political enemies of the left.

    It’s as if the Dems want to create a class of people with nothing to lose.


    https://nypost.com/2021/02/21/there-...-order-devine/
    ”The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5,012

    Default

    "But in reality, we are doing the opposite, creating a two-tier justice system that punishes only the political enemies of the left.

    It’s as if the Dems want to create a class of people with nothing to lose."

    Not a strategy for love and harmony within a nation.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Sanctuary
    Posts
    14,752

    Default

    When they and we stand before Jesus at the judgment, there won't be a double standard.
    Pastor Guest

    Free E- Book!

    "Steps Toward the Mark of the Beast"
    The Christian's Guide to the How and Why of
    the Coming Cashless/RFID Economic System


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    teh intarweb
    Posts
    5,665

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dmatic View Post
    "But in reality, we are doing the opposite, creating a two-tier justice system that punishes only the political enemies of the left.

    It’s as if the Dems want to create a class of people with nothing to lose."l


    Not a strategy for love and harmony within a nation.
    The question is, is it still a nation? Or is it an occupation?
    Look at the barricades and troops surrounding the capital. Those are not symbolic of legitimacy.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell



    Police dog 1, bad guy nothin':

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    2,581

    Default

    Canada destroying people who don't kowtow to the anti-Christ Communist Party Line:
    blob:<a href="https://www.presstv.co...f7cbcff26c</a>

    Monday, 22 February 2021 5:16 PM [ Last Update: Monday, 22 February 2021 5:32 PM ]

    A pro-Palestinian restaurant in Canada is being taken to court and faces the threat of losing its license over posting pro-Palestinian and anti-Zionist tweets, despite Ottawa government’s claim to be an advocate for human rights and freedom across the world.

    In an exclusive interview with Press TV, the owner of Foodbenders restaurant in Toronto explains how the Canadian government is accusing her establishment of anti-Semitism over anti-Israeli posts and is threatening to take her to court and revoke her license.

    “In countries in the West right now, there is a political movement to equate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism and I have been sort of caught up in that as an outspoken anti-Zionist,” Kimberley Hawkins said on Monday.

    “Many people interpret Zionism as Judiasm where I live and for this reason I have been slandered quite aggressively as an anti-Semite and it has caused many problems for me personally and for the company,” she added.

    Hawkins further explained that the blowback against her little food company started in 2019 over a signage that was on the window about massacre in the besieged Gaza Strip.

    She said the situation intensified when “the ***ish Defense League and affiliated individuals showed up at her store to commit some pretty nasty vandalism.”

    Hawkins went on to say that there are four legal cases against her, all of which rely on a social media hastag about Zionism which the Israel lobby in Canada is working to prove amounts to anti-Semitism under the law.

    “The hashtag in particular that seems to be the most talked about … is the hashtag #Zionistsnotwelcome which was intended to be in reference to annexation that was taking place in Palestine. That is not how the lobby interpreted it or at least that’s not how they want to interpret it so they are moving forward to try and prove that this hashtag is a store policy and I discriminate Zionists from my store,” she said.

    Hawkins described the move as “a political bid” to use the definition of anti-Semitism to prevent people from speaking critically about Zionists or Zionism.


    The remarks come as Elizabeth Glibbery, director of bylaw enforcement and investigation services with the city municipal licensing division, has said Hawkins is slated to go to court in two weeks for allegedly failing to comply with Chapter 545 of the Municipal Code.

    Section 8.4A of that chapter says that “No person licensed … under this chapter shall discriminate against any member of the public in the carrying on of the business on the basis of race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, creed, sex,... age, marital status, family status or disability.”

    Glibbery further said the city received “multiple complaints” about Foodbenders last year and in response, an advisory notice was sent to Hawkins last August which detailed the consequences of failing to comply with the bylaw.

    “The city investigated additional complaints received against this business and the proceedings are currently before the Ontario Court of Justice for contraventions of Chapter 545,” she said.

    Hawkins, however, said the complaints are mere “lies,” stressing she has never discriminated anyone from her store.

    She also denounced the move as “political persecution” and “corrupt,” given the fact she has been charged with crimes that she has not committed and because of her political stance against Zionism.

    The owner-operator of Foodbenders further said the ***ish Defense League has had a large hand in the attempt to bankrupt her company, adding that she has initiated her own legal action against the far-right organization which she said has been largely responsible for her “day to day suffering.”

    Elsewhere in her remarks, Hawkins criticized Canada’s claim of advocating freedom of speech, adding that power systems in the country decide “who gets to say what and when and where.”

    She also said criticism of Israel and Zionism is definitely not tolerated in Canadian spaces, noting that anyone who dares speak out against Israel’s crimes “faces the risk of losing their career, being slandered as an anti-Semite, becoming victim to legal actions and general, social ostracization.”

    Hawkins also said there is growing censorship in Canada and in the West in general, adding that pro-Palestinian groups in particular are being affected by censorship on a regular basis.

    Asked why she supports Palestinians, Hawkins responded that they are humans just like herself and “they deserve to be treated with equal and fair human rights as everyone else on earth.”

    “And so I would say that all of us should support Palestine and all indigenous groups fighting against racist apartheid. Like [Nelson] Mandela once said we know too well our freedom is incomplete without the freedom of the Palestinians and it is incumbent on all of us to work for their freedom.”

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    7,749

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bear View Post
    The question is, is it still a nation? Or is it an occupation?
    Look at the barricades and troops surrounding the capital. Those are not symbolic of legitimacy.
    Reminds you of a third world coup doesn’t it...
    But we are supposed to believe it was a fair and honest election..

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    teh intarweb
    Posts
    5,665

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmyb View Post
    Reminds you of a third world coup doesn’t it...
    But we are supposed to believe it was a fair and honest election..
    Only a fool could believe that.
    We have been conquered by communists, who at this moment are scripting the narrative of why they need to kill all dissenters. Get your head right, and get right with God.
    Tough decisions will need to be made.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    George Orwell



    Police dog 1, bad guy nothin':

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5,012

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bear View Post
    The question is, is it still a nation? Or is it an occupation?
    Look at the barricades and troops surrounding the capital. Those are not symbolic of legitimacy.
    Good questions! When the righteous rule, the people rejoice, but when the wicked rule, the people ???? It is obvious that beast people think they are still hanging on to their system, as they, obviously are corrupt and are illegitimate. The question is: How long will God allow them to deceive themselves? I believe the next 3 and 1/2 years are going to be telling. By the way, I owe $10 to you, or Earl, can't seem to find the thread where I accepted the bet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •