The Tree Of Liberty The Tree Of Liberty  

Go Back   The Tree Of Liberty > Public > Committees of Correspondence

Committees of Correspondence Hard News And Discussion Amongst Citizens Of The Tree

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-17-2012, 11:32 PM
BugoutBear's Avatar
BugoutBear BugoutBear is offline
Senator
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Partisan, Region 1: Occupied Territories
Posts: 8,524
Default

"If al Qaeda wants to destroy the America we know they'd better hurry up before Obama beats them to it."
__________________
"Obedience to Tyranny is Rebellion Against God"

Obama so loved the poor he created millions of them...

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

--- Frederic Bastait

Everything I post is Fiction and should not be taken seriously by anyone....
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-18-2012, 12:29 AM
Sam2's Avatar
Sam2 Sam2 is offline
Tree of Liberty Supporter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ozarks, Roaming
Posts: 2,555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buick Electra View Post
Show me Romney's membership in the CFR? The TC? Show me!
It is my understanding that he is not a member of the CFR nor the TC.
__________________



It is too late, for words... Resist. Or Submit.
___Resistor_____/VVVVVV\__
Trasael Adnepos once indicated that you gotta smell 'em out.
He was referring to dirty rat-finks, tattle-tales and moles.
http://74.119.217.120/vb/showpost.ph...80&postcount=5
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-18-2012, 01:34 AM
"Capt. Midnight"'s Avatar
"Capt. Midnight" "Capt. Midnight" is offline
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ohio
Posts: 4,126
Default

Look, Romms may not be a "bad," guy. But I'm not alone in this hold your nose, and pull the lever mess.

TPTB shoved a demopublican down our throats last time, and I will say right up front, that LAST demopublican wore his countries uniform, so hats off.

The so called, and coveted undecideds, or middle roaders, when given the choice between a real democrat, and a demopublican, go democrat, every time.

I know it SOUNDS like I don't like the guy, and I've never met him, but just going on the facts from here; almost identical to his opponent in policy, is a member of a controversial Religious sect, gives large sums to them, but otherwise publicly distances himself from those values, as in right to life, which just makes him look like an oily and dishonest person.

And he besides being a member, who is not comfortable OWNING up to his Religion, he is going to be painted as a 1% kind of guy, NOT FAIR, I will grant you.

There is NO chance in hecks kitchen this guy will EVEN get as many votes as McCain. Sorry. just is.

Bams can run his "campaign," from the wot' house, or vacation.

There is nothing more to see here, move along.

Sux, but we sat by and let this happen, now we EAT the sht sandwich.

I REFUSE to get behind someone who has nothing in common with my values, and the few that he SHOULD have in common, he REFUSES to stand up for.

Fudge em'
__________________
"You Can't MAKE this stuff up."


They cast their silver into the streets, and their gold is like an unclean thing. Their silver and gold are not able to deliver them in the day of the wrath of the Lord. They cannot satisfy their hunger or fill their stomachs with it. For it was the stumbling block of their iniquity.
Ezekiel 7:19



Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-18-2012, 02:14 AM
CaptSkip's Avatar
CaptSkip CaptSkip is offline
Land Owner
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 744
Default

This is helpful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism

<snip>

Multiple incompatible definitions


As social Darwinism has many definitions, it is hard for some to be either for or against it; some of the definitions oppose the others. As The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics states
Part of the difficulty in establishing sensible and consistent usage is that commitment to the biology of natural selection and to 'survival of the fittest' entailed nothing uniform either for sociological method or for political doctrine. A 'social Darwinist' could just as well be a defender of laissez-faire as a defender of state socialism, just as much an imperialist as a domestic eugenist.[31]

Laissez-faire individualism, Nazism, eugenics, fascism, imperialism


Therefore, Fascist and National Socialist ideology subscribed to a different form of social Darwinism than the laissez-faire version because they were not advocates for an individualist order of society, rather they advocated racial and national struggle where the state planned and controlled human breeding through science and eugenics—a program that no proponent of laissez-faire could consistently endorse.[32] Darwinist Collectivism or Reform Darwinism, rather than the individualist form of Darwinism, are more accurate terms for these ideologies.[3]
Some pre-twentieth century doctrines subsequently described as social Darwinism appear to anticipate state imposed eugenics [3] and the race doctrines of Nazism. Critics have frequently linked evolution, Charles Darwin and social Darwinism with racialism, nationalism, imperialism and eugenics, contending that social Darwinism became one of the pillars of fascism and Nazi ideology, and that the consequences of the application of policies of "survival of the fittest" by Nazi Germany eventually created a very strong backlash against the theory.[33][34]
As mentioned above, Social Darwinism has often been linked to nationalism and imperialism.[35] During the age of New Imperialism, the concepts of evolution justified the exploitation of "lesser breeds without the law" by "superior races."[35] To elitists, strong nations were composed of white people who were successful at expanding their empires, and as such, these strong nations would survive in the struggle for dominance.[35] With this attitude, Europeans, except for Christian missionaries, seldom adopted the customs and languages of local people under their empires.[35]
<snip>
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:48 AM
Wolfman's Avatar
Wolfman Wolfman is offline
Citizen
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAG06 View Post
Here's the antidote: Pitchforks, torches, a cement mixer full of hot tar, a dumptruck full of feathers, about 600 rails, and a mob big enough to run them all out of town.
"An angry mob is an ugly thing - and it's about time we had one"!

Looosely quouted from Young Frankenstein

Last edited by Wolfman; 04-18-2012 at 08:49 AM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 04-18-2012, 12:30 PM
dosadi's Avatar
dosadi dosadi is offline
Merchant
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 278
Default

axlerod reminds me of that dr phil fellow and he dr phil is one fellow who I absolutly cannot abide to even listen to.

I have never , not once found the smallest redeeming quality in him, nor do i in axelrod / zero etc.

I think "snake oil Salesman" when I see em.
__________________
Dosadi

III
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 04-18-2012, 02:11 PM
Milk-maid Milk-maid is offline
Congressman
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Looking at Beautiful mountains
Posts: 3,348
Default

Good golly that Ulsterman is an idiot.

But...

He's exactly what we're up against. The majority of people don't see it either. He is typical of this generation coming up. They are blind to what is happening. The boiling frog is right.

Is all hope lost?

I wasn't raised in NAZI Germany's generation, but I see all the signs. It's for those with eyes to see.

MM
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
NOTICE: The Tree of Liberty is an Internet forum for discussion of current news, national, and world events. The opinions posted do not necessarily represent those of Tree of Liberty, LLC (the owner of this website), the staff or the site's host. Responsibility for the content of each post rests solely with the Individual Member making them. Neither Tree of Liberty LLC, the Staff, nor the site's host shall be liable for any content. All original member content posted on this forum becomes the property of Tree of Liberty,LLC for archival and display purposes on the TheTreeofLiberty.com website venue. Said content may be removed or edited at staff discretion. The original authors retain all rights to their material outside of TheTreeofLiberty.Com website venue. Publication of any original material from TheTreeofLiberty.Com on other websites or venues without permission from Tree of Liberty LLC, or the original author is expressly forbidden.