Arctic

[breezy]

Any "calculations" when NYC goes under water???

[TonyM]

Any "calculations" when NYC goes under water???

Yes


https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sl...?stnid=8518750

[breezy]

Is NASA going back on its analysis here?

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestay.../#1606a3e632da

[TonyM]

Is NASA going back on its analysis here?

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979. Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestay.../#1606a3e632da

The article to which you refer cites one source, which is http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph....withtrend.jpg

If you look at that source, you will see that it has been updated, and conditions that existed prior to 2012 have changed significantly. That source shows 2016 had less polar ice than any earlier year in the satellite record.

[breezy]

The article to which you refer cites one source, which is http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph....withtrend.jpg

If you look at that source, you will see that it has been updated, and conditions that existed prior to 2012 have changed significantly. That source shows 2016 had less polar ice than any earlier year in the satellite record.

So, they have changed(updated) their data.......again.

[TonyM]

So, they have changed(updated) their data.......again.

Yes, the data has been updated each year --

[breezy]

Revised, to meet the global warming agenda, you mean.

[TonyM]

It’s also much more informative to look, not at just the annual minimum values, but at the annual average values



This year will have, without doubt, the lowest annual average on record.

They haven’t talked much about Arctic sea ice since September, because
as much as the April-May lows were a shock, a bigger shock by far is
what happened since October:



https://tamino.wordpress.com/2016/12...6-arctic-spin/

[breezy]

They are using crayons now on their charts?

[Oscar Wilde]

Curious. Are these studies squandering wee peepses tax dollars or are they being funded by grants from other "private parties"?

O.W.