The Globalist Agenda

[Lenno]

Roger Stone Joins Hannity for First Interview After Trump Commutes Sentence – Says Corrupt Mueller Attorney Jeannie Rhee Pressured Him to Make Up Lies on President! (Video)

[Lenno]

“Traditional Media Is Right Behind the Mob – Marxists Who Oppose Everything I Stand For” – Attorney Mark McCloskey Speaks Out on Tucker Carlson (VIDEO)

[Lenno]

The Logic Of Political Violence

Back in the Cold War, one of the things Americans would puzzle over was the political violence behind the Iron Curtain. Most Americans assumed they would resist the state terrorism they heard about from the media. Of course, they assumed such a thing could never happen in America. Today we are seeing just how easily state sponsored terrorism can get going in any country. The reason is there is a political logic to murder that comes as a part of ideological movements.
The logic of political violence is best understood by considering the way Progressives frame their anti-speech pogroms. They keep equaling words and ideas that vex them with violence. For example, someone posting crime statistics on Twitter is accused of posting violent content or inciting violence. At the same time, BLM burning shops and murdering young white mothers is pure political expression. Language they don’t like is violence and violence they like is free expression.
All acts, speaking or physical activity, are judged in purely partisan terms. That person murdering white mothers on behalf of the Progressive cause is morally good by default, as he is sustaining and advancing the interests of the cause. Similarly, the person who stops laughing too soon at an official joke is consciously or unconsciously working against the interest of the cause. He’s a threat. In other words, all actions are judged only in partisan terms, not in relative terms.
Further, making total war on anyone acting against the cause, even by mild simple disagreement, is a form of self-defense to the partisan. The logic here is that someone saying something that contradicts the beliefs of the Progressive cause must be at war with the partisans of the cause. After all, what makes the partisan a partisan is his fidelity to his cause. To invalidate the cause, even by questioning it, is to invalidate him and therefore, striking at the bad speaker is self-defense.
Again, you see this in their language. Before the lock downs, colleges had already implemented a policy of “safe spaces” on campus. These were places where Progressive activists could be totally free of criticism or questioning. The post-modern partisan equates physical safety, not only with the lack of disagreement from outsiders, but the absence of anyone and anything that contradicts the cause. They demand to be insulated from physical reality, as well as contrary opinion.
https://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=20892

[Lenno]

https://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/thegreatreset

[Lenno]

CONSTANT BULLYING’: Writer/Editor Quits New York Times, Rips Rag: If You ‘Speak Your Mind … You’ll Be Hung Out To Dry’

[Lenno]

SHOCKER: Co-Founder of Never Trump ‘Lincoln Project’ Was Foreign Agent for …Russia

[Lenno]

Cuban immigrant WARNS against socialism at Trump roundtable

[Lenno]

MSNBC Analyst: Trump Will Not Leave if He Loses — Will Send Militia to Vote Counting Centers

[Lenno]

Have it Their way

[Lenno]

The Woke Mob Targets Texas Rangers