Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 71

Thread: Obama is Setting Us Up

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,290

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vector7 View Post
    The USD Trap Is Closing: Dollar Exclusion Zone Crosses The Pacific As Brazil Signs China Currency Swap

    Submitted by Tyler Durden on 06/22/2012 08:23 -0400

    When the US Dollar is ultimately dethroned as the world's reserve currency (and finally gets rid of all those ridiculous three letter post-Keynesian economic "theories") nobody will have seen it coming. Well, nobody except for the following headlines: ""World's Second (China) And Third Largest (Japan) Economies To Bypass Dollar, Engage In Direct Currency Trade", "China, Russia Drop Dollar In Bilateral Trade", "China And Iran To Bypass Dollar, Plan Oil Barter System", "India and Japan sign new $15bn currency swap agreement", "Iran, Russia Replace Dollar With Rial, Ruble in Trade, Fars Says", "India Joins Asian Dollar Exclusion Zone, Will Transact With Iran In Rupees."

    And while the expansion of the "dollar exclusion zone" was actually quite glaring to anyone who dared to look, one thing was obvious: it was confined to Asia. No more courtesy of the following FT headline: "Brazil and China agree currency swap."

    More: "Brazil has provided a vote of confidence in China’s efforts to promote the renminbi as a reserve currency by becoming the biggest economy yet to agree a swap deal with Beijing.

    US Economy: Inflation Raging - As are the People

    Written by Peter Kent
    Friday, 22 April 2011 13:50

    As gas prices go over the $4 mark and consumers are shocked at the new prices of food and other essential items as inflation continues to rage; tensions and tempers of the people have also begun to rise in the United States as the mood of the country has fallen to Jimmy Carter type levels from the late 1970’s. There seems to be no end in sight for the US economy and especially relief at the pump as the traditional summer driving season is set to commence.

    Many families are being forced to make difficult choices about whether or not to cut summer vacations, cut piano lessons or sports for their children and address other quality of life issues as the misery is spreading like wild fire. The Obama Administration has continued to print money to the point where many US economists and leaders fear the dollar will become as worthless as the paper it was printed on. The dollar has fallen to a 2.5-year low which is right around the time that Barrack Obama took office as President.

    China's new alliance strategy to isolate U.S. from its allies before war

    Beijing to press for wide-ranging ties with NATO members

    Published: 03/26/2012 at 8:45 PM



    </time>WASHINGTON – China is considering a change in its historical policy of avoiding alliances and is looking to establish military and strategic ties with other countries in an effort to counter U.S. military influence worldwide, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.

    Chinese strategists suggested the move in a conference sponsored by China’s National Security Policy Commission, which is led by senior military officers who are virulently anti-American.

    Already, recent Chinese strategic decisions have indicated a new policy already is under way.

    “History of the world tells us that, whether it’s in political, economic or military arenas, Western nations, without any exception, always resorted to alliances,” said one Chinese security analyst.

    “China must change its non-alliance policy,” he said. “We must consider forming alliances. Otherwise, in a future war with the U.S., we will not be able to politically or militarily counter America’s global alliance network just by ourselves.

    Flaherty Says Russia, China May Buy Canada Dollars

    By Theophilos Argitis and Christopher Fournier

    Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Canada’s Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said China, with the world’s largest currency reserves of $2.3 trillion, may be poised to buy Canadian dollars as it seeks to shield its reserves against the U.S. dollar’s decline.

    “It does not surprise me that China and Russia would take greater positions in the Canadian dollar than they have previously,” Flaherty, 59, said during an interview in his office in Ottawa. “I would expect countries looking around the world to invest in market currencies that are reliable.”


    Canada Hints Russia, China to Shun U.S. Dollar

    Wednesday, 23 Dec 2009 12:17 PM
    Article Font Size

    By: Dan Weil

    Russian and Chinese officials have been warning for months that they plan to diversify away from the U.S. dollar.

    And Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says his country may be a beneficiary.

    “It does not surprise me that China and Russia would take greater positions in the Canadian dollar than they have previously,” Flaherty told Bloomberg.

    “I would expect countries looking around the world to invest in market currencies that are reliable.”

    The Canadian dollar has jumped 15 percent against its U.S. counterpart this year.

    Russia diversifies into Canadian dollars

    By Peter Garnham
    FT.com

    Published: January 20 2010 16:46 | Last updated: January 20 2010 16:46

    Russia’s central bank announced on Wednesday that it had started buying Canadian dollars and securities in a bid to diversify its foreign exchange reserves.

    Analysts said the move could be a sign of increased diversification of emerging market central bank assets away from the dollar and into investments denominated in other commodity-linked currencies, such as the Australian dollar.

    Adam Cole at RBC Capital Markets said if taken in isolation, Russia’s announcement that it was buying Canadian dollars was not significant, but if it was part of a broader trend, then it was an important step.

    “If it is a barometer for the activity of other central banks, then its is structurally positive for the currencies of countries like Canada and Australia that have a commodity bias in their economies,” he said.

    Although not officially confirmed, traders said that other emerging market central banks, including some in Asia which hold large foreign exchange reserves, have also been active in the foreign exchange market in recent weeks buying both Canadian dollars and Australian dollars.

    Alexei Ulyukayev, first deputy chairman of Russia’s central bank, said that it would invest in Canadian dollar-denominated deposits and bonds.

    “The Canadian financial market is not very deep, so we can invest in deposits in significant volumes, while the bond market is limited,” he said.

    Will Canada follow the U.S. into China's seas?

    By Brian Stewart, special to CBC News

    Posted: May 17, 2012 7:16 PM ET
    Last Updated: May 18, 2012 10:03 AM ET

    Read 138 comments


    China's defence spending, the second highest after the U.S., is set to rise 11 per cent in 2012 to $106 billion, according to recent reports.
    (Reuters)

    This summer, the largest international naval exercise in the world will see Canada's navy take on the second-largest role and Canadian officers share key commands — a remarkable prominence that Ottawa seems uncharacteristically reluctant to boast about.

    ~snip~

    But in the world of military alliances, actions always speak far louder than words.




    China Doubles Korea Bond Holdings as Asia Switches From Dollar

    By Frances Yoon - Aug 18, 2010 12:57 AM CT

    Play Video

    Aug. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Kenneth Lieberthal, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute, a Washington policy group, talks about the outlook for China's economy and the mainland's holdings of U.S. Treasuries. China cut its holdings of Treasury notes and bonds by the most ever, raising speculation the plunge in U.S. yields that sent two-year rates to a record low has made government securities too expensive for some investors. Lieberthal talks with Bloomberg's Rishaad Salamat from Washington. (Source: Bloomberg)

    China more than doubled South Korean debt holdings this year, spurring the notes’ longest rally in more than three years, as policy makers shifted part of the world’s largest foreign-exchange reserves out of dollars.


    China, Japan, S. Korea agree to consider settling trade in their own currencies

    05-05-2011 10:23 BJT

    Finance ministers from China, Japan and South Korea have agreed to consider settling trade in their own currencies. It was just one outcome from the trilateral ministers forum, on the sidelines of the Asian Development Bank's annual meeting in Hanoi.

    A statement from the Finance ministers said China, Japan and South Korea have agreed to study the use of their own currencies in trade settlement. Analysts say if the three countries start to settle trade with their own currencies, that will reduce dependence on the US dollar.


    Finance ministers from China, Japan and South Korea have agreed to
    consider settling trade in their own currencies.


    The statement from the ministers also says the three countries are
    mindful of challenges, like growing inflationary pressures in Asia, rising global commodity prices and increasingly volatile capital flows into the region.

    The three Asian giants will continue to implement appropriate macro-economic policies and strengthen policy cooperation to achieve strong, sustainable and balanced economic growth in the three countries.

    The three parties also agreed to investigate regional infrastructure financing and disaster risk insurance.

    Related stories




    Japan's young turn to Communist Party as they decide capitalism has let them down

    With its gleaming designer stores, the world's second largest economy and an insatiable appetite for luxury labels, Japan has long been regarded as the land of the rising capitalist.

    By Danielle Demetriou in Tokyo
    Last Updated: 9:19AM BST 18 Oct 2008

    But a wave of discontent among its younger workers is fuelling a change in the nation's political landscape: communism is suddenly back in fashion.

    What many young Japanese view as an erosion of their economic security and employment rights, combined with years of political stagnation, are propelling droves of them into the arms of the Japanese Communist Party (JCP), the nation's fourth largest political party.

    New recruits are signing up at the rate of 1,000 a month, swelling its ranks to more than 415,000. Meanwhile a classic proletarian novel is at the top of the best-seller lists, and communist-themed "manga" comics are enjoying soaring success...

    China, Japan launch world's biggest online marketplace

    by Staff Writers
    Tokyo (AFP) June 1, 2010

    The combined number of users on the new service is expected to eclipse the 90 million active users at US online marketplace eBay, which last year sold goods valued at 60 billion dollars.


    China's largest retail website Taobao and Yahoo Japan launched a joint service Tuesday in a deal expected to create the world's biggest online marketplace by harnessing Asia's surging ranks of e-consumers. The service is expected to dwarf US rival eBay in terms of users and products on offer, attracting 250 million customers and offering 450 million products.

    "This marks the birth of the world's largest e-commerce market," Masayoshi Son, chairman of Yahoo! Japan and CEO of mobile phone carrier Softbank, told a packed hall in a Tokyo hotel.


    Japan's Disaster Brings Sino-Japanese Relations Closer

    March 22, 2011

    At times succour in adversity can open up fresh avenues to normalize strained relations between two countries locked in distrust and enmity. This seems to be happening between China and Japan in the wake of disaster that befell Japan recently.

    Chinese, Japanese leaders unveil deals on bond sales, currency to tighten finance ties

    By Joe McDonald, The Associated Press | December 26, 2011

    BEIJING, China - Chinese and Japanese leaders have unveiled initiatives to tighten financial links between East Asia's economic giants and sometime rivals — measures that could expand use of China's tightly controlled currency abroad.

    During a visit to Beijing by Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda, the two governments said in a surprise announcement Sunday they will encourage use of their own currencies in bilateral trade, which now is conducted mostly in U.S. dollars.

    They also agreed to support the sale of bonds denominated in China's yuan by Japanese companies in Tokyo and foreign markets and by the state-owned Japan Bank of International Cooperation in mainland China's markets, which are closed to most foreign investors.

    The pledges were a striking step for China and Japan, which are the world's second- and third-largest economies and are bound by billions of dollars in trade but whose political relations often are strained over conflicting territorial claims and other disputes.

    "To support the growing economic and financial ties between China and Japan, the leaders of China and Japan have agreed to enhance mutual co-operation in financial markets of both countries and encourage financial transactions between the two countries," the governments said in identically worded statements.

    Monday, Dec. 26, 2011
    Japan to start purchasing Chinese government bonds

    Kyodo

    BEIJING — Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao agreed Sunday to step up cooperation in international finance, with Japan to begin purchases of Chinese government bonds and both to encourage the use of their own currencies instead of the dollar when settling bilateral trades, officials said.

    The two leaders also decided during their talks in Beijing to set up a working group composed of officials from both countries to discuss private-sector requests on deregulation and other issues.

    Chinese authorities control capital inflows and allow only designated countries to purchase limited amounts of their government bonds. Japan is now expected to join that process.


    Yen-Yuan Trade Plan to Cut Dollar Dependence of China, Japan

    December 26, 2011, 10:06 AM EST

    By Toru Fujioka

    (Adds Chinese foreign ministry comment in 7th paragraph.)

    Dec. 26 (Bloomberg) -- Japan and China will promote direct trading of the yen and yuan without using dollars and will encourage the development of a market for companies involved in the exchanges, the Japanese government said.

    Japan will also apply to buy Chinese bonds next year, allowing the investment of renminbi that leaves China during the transactions, the Japanese government said in a statement after a meeting between Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao in Beijing yesterday. Encouraging direct yen- yuan settlement should reduce currency risks and trading costs, the Japanese and Chinese governments said.


    Japan, China to launch direct yen-yuan trade on June 1

    Mon May 28, 2012 8:41pm EDT

    * Move aimed at facilitating trade, financial transactions
    * Deal is part of agreement at bilateral summit in December


    By Tetsushi Kajimoto

    TOKYO, May 29 (Reuters) - Japan and China will launch direct yen-yuan trade in the Tokyo and Shanghai markets from June 1 to facilitate trade and financial transactions between Asia's two biggest economies, Japanese Finance Minister Jun Azumi said on Tuesday.

    The step follows an agreement between the leaders of the two countries in December to promote direct trading of their currencies without the interim step of using dollars to set exchange rates.

    "By conducting transactions without using the third country's currency, it will bring merits of reducing transaction costs and lowering risks involved in settlements at financial institutions," Azumi told reporters after a cabinet meeting.

    "That will contribute to improve convenience of the both countries' currencies and reinvigorate the Tokyo market," he said.


    China And Japan Currency Swap: Nail In US Dollar’s Coffin

    Written by: Pambazuka New
    January 27, 2012
    By Horace Campbell



    On 25 December 2011, the government of Peoples Republic of China and Japan unveiled plans to promote direct exchange of their currencies. This agreement will allow firms to convert the Chinese and Japanese currencies directly into each other, thus negating the need to buy dollars. This deal between China and Japan followed agreements between China and numerous countries to trade outside the sphere of the US dollar. A few weeks earlier, China also announced a 70 billion Yuan ($11 billion) currency swap agreement with Thailand.

    After visiting China, the Prime Minister of Japan Yoshihiko Noda went on to India and signed another currency swap agreement with the government of India. These currency agreements in Asia came in a year when the countries of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam) were seeking to deepen ways to strengthen their firewall to protect their economies from the continued devaluation of the US dollar. In the year of the ‘Eurozone crisis’ when the future of the EURO as a viable currency was fraught with uncertainty, many states were reconsidering holding their reserves in the US dollar.

    Moreover, in the face of the neo-liberal orthodoxy of the Bretton Woods institutions (especially the IMF) swap agreements were proliferating in all parts of the globe. The Latin Americans established the Bank of the South and are slowly laying the groundwork for a new currency, the SUCRE. As in Asia, the Bank of the South will be one of the fundamental institutions of the Union of South American Nations that has been launched in Latin America in order to guarantee the independence of the societies of Latin America. Not to be left as the only region holding dollars, the leaders of the oil rich states of the Gulf Cooperation Council have been buying gold while announcing as long ago as 2009 the intention to establish a monetary union with a common currency. In Africa there are plans for the strengthening of the financial basis of the African Union but so far there has not been the same kind coordinated regional plans for financial independence. During the period of the debate on the debt crisis in the USA, the Nigerian central bank governor Lamido Sanusi announced that Nigeria plans to invest 5 to 10 percent of its foreign exchange reserves in the Chinese currency – the Yuan also known as the renminbi (RMB).

    These accelerated Swap agreements – (agreements between two or several countries (bilateral vs. multilateral) on exchanging currencies in times of crisis) – came a decade after the countries of ASEAN established the Chiang Mai Initiative (CMI). In the aftermath of the Asian economic crash and the currency attack by speculators of the financial services industry, the CMI had been established to promote financial cooperation among the ASEAN countries with regional collaboration on currency issues high on the agenda. Initially when the CMI was launched, the government of China had been lukewarm to the goals of the CMI but over decade, especially after the 2007-2008 Wall Street crash, the preliminary partnership that was called ASEAN plus three (Viz ASEAN countries plus China, Japan and Korea) matured to the point where the ASEAN Swap Agreements have now been expanded to the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (CMIM) agreement, and a set of rules with structured mechanisms for financial regionalism to work for the development of Asian bond markets. These three pillars of the new Asian economic cooperation – CMIM, Asian Bond Markets and bilateral swap agreements – mark a new stage in the international political order.

    This week we will examine the implications of the Chinese/ Japan currency swap in the context of the internal discussions in China about the consolidation of socialism. In 2011, China overtook Japan as the second largest economy in the world, and every expansion increases internal and external pressures on the socialist goals of the People’s Republic of China. More importantly, it is crucial to recollect the competitive devaluations and currency wars of the last depression so that the decline of the dollar can be managed in a way that avoids the recourse to open confrontation of the last depression. It is worth remembering that one of the goals of the fascists in the last depression was to roll back socialism.

    In our contribution this week we will examine the implications of the swap agreement between China and Japan and the pressures on other regions to delink from the dollar. The conclusion will argue that this swap is one more nail in the coffin of the dollar as the international reserve currency.

    ‘CHINA, JAPAN TO BACK DIRECT TRADE OF CURRENCIES’

    This was the headline in the financial press as Bloomberg News and other news sheets of the financial world reported the agreement on settling trade between the two countries in Yen and RMB instead of dollar. With US $340 Billion of transactions in 2010 between the two countries, both being each other’s biggest trading partner, the deal is a clear break away from US financial domination. This Bloomberg Report stated, ‘Japan and China will promote direct trading of the Yen and Yuan without using dollars and will encourage the development of a market for companies involved in the exchanges, the Japanese government said.

    Japan will also apply to buy Chinese bonds next year, allowing the investment of renminbi that leaves China during the transactions, the Japanese government said in a statement after a meeting between Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao in Beijing yesterday. Encouraging direct Yen- Yuan settlement should reduce currency risks and trading costs, the Japanese and Chinese governments said. China is Japan’s biggest trading partner with 26.5 trillion Yen ($340 billion) in two-way transactions last year, from 9.2 trillion Yen a decade earlier.

    The pacts between the world’s second- and third-largest economies mirror attempts by fund managers to diversify as the two-year-old European debt crisis keeps global financial markets volatile.

    ‘Given the huge size of the trade volume between Asia’s two biggest economies, this agreement is much more significant than any other pacts China has signed with other nations.’

    Less than two weeks later, in the first week of January 2012, the President of South Korea Lee Myung-bak travelled to China to discuss a ‘bilateral strategic partnership.’ This discussion on bilateral partnership between South Korea and China took place in a context where the Republic of South Korea did not want to be left behind. Ostensibly the visit to China was to discuss the recent passing of Kim Jung IL of North Korea but Chinese media reported that China, Japan and South Korea were hammering out the basic framework for a free trade agreement between the three biggest economies in East Asia.

    These agreements will have implications for the dollar as the global reserve currency and there will be increased pressures for the Chinese currency to be internationalized as other societies follow the lead of Japan and seek swap agreements outside of the dollar.

    SLOW EROSION OF THE POWER OF THE DOLLAR AND MANAGING THIS NEW MULTIPOLAR CURRENCY ENVIRONMENT

    Japan is one of closest allies of the United States. There are thousands of US troops stationed in Japan, but the Japanese, like all peoples of the world, have been losing money as the US dollar was devalued over the past three years. This devaluation has taken the form of what the US authorities called quantitative easing. There has been two such quantitative easings since the 2009 as the United States unloaded more fiat currency on the world. Whatever the name (devaluations or quantitative easing) all countries in the world were thinking of finding ways to escape being hostages to the US dollar and Central Bank governors from Brazil to India and beyond are working to protect their societies from these devaluations. Asian central banks together hold some $3,3 Trillion in reserves, amounting to an impressive 46 percent of the world’s total national reserves. The government of China has vowed to reduce its holding of US dollars and in 2011. The China Daily newspaper reported that, ‘According to data from the US Treasury Department, China’s holdings of US Treasury bonds stood at $1.1326 trillion by the end of November 2011, $1.5 billion down from the previous month. It was the second successive month that the amount had declined, and the lowest reserve level seen since July 2010. China made six monthly cuts of US debt in 2011, the department’s data showed, trimming its holdings by $27.5 billion from the end of 2010. Yet despite the reductions, China remains the top buyer of US Treasury securities.”

    What was left unsaid was the plan of the political leadership of China for a deft management of the reductions so that the international political economy is not drastically affected leading to unforeseen circumstances.

    Over the past decade numerous officials from the National People’s Congress, the Central Bank and the commercial sectors have been stating that China has to reduce its holdings of US bonds and diversify into other currencies. When, over five years ago, Parliamentary vice-chairman Cheng Siwei, called for the diversification of Chinese reserves away from US bonds, the implicit assumption was that China would diversify and buy European bonds. This was before the full hollowness of the European project became manifest to the world.

    PRESSURES TO INTERNATIONALIZE CHINESE CURRENCY

    The Chinese economy has registered an average of over 10 per cent growth in the past thirty years. This has been the most successful transformation of an economy in the recorded history of political economy, but the pundits do not like to point to the socialist foundations of China and the sacrifices made by the Chinese people to transform their society. Mao Zedong called the currency of China, the Renminbi, and the people’s currency. Renminbi is the official name of the currency introduced by the Communist People’s Republic of China at the time of its foundation in 1949. The other name for the currency is the Yuan. Hence the Chinese currency is known by a number of names (including the Kuai).

    As a low wage economy, the hard work of the Chinese producers has made the society a force to be reckoned with and the currency attractive to other countries seeking a refuge from the dollar. The political leaders in China have been careful about the pace and nature of the internationalization of the currency. The leaders have slowly allowed Hong Kong to become an offshore renminbi financial centre by allowing authorized institutions in Hong Kong to offer renminbi services such as deposit taking, currency exchange, remittance and trading in RMB denominated bonds. Since 2009 when the Chinese government opened this slight door to the internationalization of its currency, other financial centres such as Macau and Singapore have been hoping to get into the offshore RMB business.
    These regional pressures for the internationalization of the RMB came up against the hard reality that for the full internationalization of the currency, for the RMB to become a global currency, the government of China would have to establish capital markets and ensure the full convertibility of capital account. The balance of forces within China would then shift in favour of the one per cent who would then privatise state assets at a faster rate. In the present international system, opening such capital markets beyond the tightly controlled stock exchanges would open up the Chinese currency to the kind of full scale attack and speculation that was witnessed in the Asian financial crisis in 1997. Thus far the Chinese state has held the line against the expansion of capital markets in ways that would undermine the stability of the society.

    The economy of China is a mixed economy with the state-owned enterprises dominating the economy. Of the ten largest companies on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, eight are state owned. With the growth and power of the Chinese economy, the Chinese capitalists have expanded with a large number of billionaires. These billionaires do not control political power and the Chinese state continues to subsidise food, education and transportation services. There are many limitations to the nature of the Chinese political system, especially the hothouse of growth and accumulation that is creating a fundamental environmental hazard for the majority of the citizens. The growing inequalities and the massive push for the reversal of socialist gains since 1949 are now compounded by an alliance between capitalists in Singapore and the US who are calling for speeding the internationalisation of the RMB.

    It is in this context where the December 25 agreement to allow Japan to ‘apply to buy Chinese bonds next year’ becomes significant. It is again worth quoting the press reports of the December 25 agreement. According to the British Broadcasting Corporation, ‘The two leaders also agreed to allow the Japan Bank for International Cooperation to issue Yuan-denominated bonds in China, the first time a foreign government body has been allowed to do so. At the same time Japan said it was also looking to buy Chinese government bonds, a move that analysts believe may prove to be mutually beneficial to both nations. ‘By adopting Chinese bonds as a part of official foreign exchange reserves, Japan is labelling Chinese bonds as an investable asset,’ according to Takuji Okubo of Societe Generale Tokyo.

    ‘This should encourage Japanese private investment into Chinese bonds, as well as into other Asian emerging currencies. Such a development in turn should help develop offshore currency trading in Japan.’

    This new collaboration between China and Japan has been underlined by the Japanese Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba who on Tuesday said that ‘Japan will seek to take a less inward-looking stance when it comes to diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific region.’ In the words of the China daily newspaper the Foreign Minister said that, ‘Japan will look to enhance diplomatic ties with China based on mutually beneficial goals. With China, this year marks the 40th anniversary of normalizing diplomatic ties, we will aim to deepen the mutually beneficial relationship based on common strategic interests,’ Gemba said in his first foreign policy speech in parliament.

    He went on to say that Japan plans to proactively make ‘concrete efforts’ to strengthen its ties with China and establish more ‘open and multilayered networks’ in the best interests of both countries.

    Ever alert to these shifts in the global currency and financial markets, the British Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, travelled to Hong Kong in January and offered London as the western base for the coming internationalization of the RMB. Osborne was vociferously making a plea to make London the leading centre for trading the Chinese currency. This conservative Chancellor was exposing the opportunism of the British and demonstrating the short memory of the British hoping that the Chinese have forgotten the Opium Wars.

    UNITED STATES SENATE CURRENCY BILL

    While the British were declaring their willingness to embrace the RMB, the US Senate has gone about increasing the war of words against China. In the failure to compete in the so-called ‘marketplace,’ sections of the US political leadership have for years been complaining that China should allow open markets for its currency and for its currency to appreciate more rapidly. There are two sections of the US political establishment pushing against the Chinese currency. The first are those allied to Wall Street and the currency speculators who want to be able to trade in the Chinese currency and to do to China what was done to Malaysia, Taiwan, Thailand and other Asian economies in 1997. The second pressure is coming from those sections of capital who complain that China is flooding US markets.

    While these two sections do not agree they support the information war against China, this information war carries the refrain that the renminbi is undervalued by 25-30 percent against the dollar, which means Chinese exports to the US become 25-30 percent cheaper, while US goods exported to China are more expensive.

    Even though China has allowed its currency to appreciate a little in the last two years, the two sections of capital in the US hostile to China have said that this is not enough. In October 2011 the US Senate passed S.1619, the Currency Exchange Rate Oversight Act of 2011, and a bill to address China’s ongoing currency manipulation, by a vote of 63-35.

    One year earlier one commentator for Time Magazine had noted correctly that the real challenge for the United States was to change its consumption patterns.

    ‘We’ve seen this movie before. From July 2005 to July 2008, under pressure from the US government, Beijing allowed its currency to rise against the dollar by 21 percent. Despite that hefty increase, China’s exports to the US continued to grow mightily. Of course, once the recession hit, China’s exports slowed, but not as much as those of countries that had not let their currencies rise. So even with relatively pricier goods, China did better than other exporting nations.

    Look elsewhere in the past and you come to the same conclusion. In 1985 the US browbeat Japan at the Plaza Accord meetings into letting the yen rise. But the subsequent 50 percent increase did little to make American goods more competitive. Yale University’s Stephen Roach points out that since 2002, the US dollar has fallen in value by 23 percent against all our trading partners, and yet American exports are not booming. The US imports more than it exports from 90 countries around the world. Is this because of currency manipulation by those countries, or is it more likely a result of fundamental choices we have made as a country to favor consumption over investment and manufacturing?’

    TRANSITIONS: END OF DOLLAR HEGEMONY AND THE NEW INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE

    This commentary on the need for the US to transform its economy and live within its means fell short of outlining a more fundamental problem, that of the military management of the international system and the outmoded imperial impulses that stem from the kind of militarism that now reflect US society. While the Japanese and the Chinese were deepening economic relations, the US political leaders were intensifying its bellicose rhetoric about Chinese military buildup in the South China Sea and pushing forward the idea of a Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement. Japan was being wooed to become a key anchor of the US dominated TPP.

    The China/Japan currency swap was a bold move on the part of these two economic giants in Asia. There are historic difference between the Chinese and Japanese, especially the experiences of the 1930’s Japanese occupation of China and the Rape of Nanking. Notwithstanding these historic differences the US debt of over US $ 14 trillion along with the inability of the US political leaders to effectively tackle the growing debt has awoken many that the US dollar as the international reserve currency is on its last legs.

    In May 2009, Nouriel Roubini in a contribution to the New York Times on the Almighty Renmimbi summed up the decline of the dollar in this way,
    ‘This decline of the dollar might take more than a decade, but it could happen even sooner if the US did not get its financial house in order. If China and other countries were to diversify their reserve holdings away from the dollar — and they eventually will — the United States would suffer. It would take a long time for the renminbi to become a reserve currency, but it could happen. The resulting downfall of the dollar may be only a matter of time.’

    Nouriel Roubini was writing this warning to alert the US rulers to shift gears because of the rise of China. He called for a strategy of investments to recover the US economy declaring, ‘Now that the dollar’s position is no longer so secure, we need to shift our priorities. This will entail investing in our crumbling infrastructure, alternative and renewable resources and productive human capital — rather than in unnecessary housing and toxic financial innovation. This will be the only way to slow down the decline of the dollar, and sustain our influence in global affairs.’

    China and Japan have taken a decisive step to diversify their reserve holdings away from the dollar. What is more fundamental is the new rush by other states to join in this new regional currency arrangement. Republic of South Korea is knocking to become central to this swap arrangement while other members of ASEAN are watching these developments carefully.

    The Eurozone crisis has narrowed the ability of the US to respond negatively to the China/Japan currency swap. Importantly, the capitalist crisis in Europe has stiffened the spine of those elements of the Chinese society who proclaim that the principal task of China is to bail out its own people and transform the economy to benefit the 1.3 billion citizens.

    These left forces in China are calling for the consolidation of socialism and for vigilance to halt the power of those who are calling for a speedy internationalization of the RMB. These social elements understand the realities behind the call for opening capital markets in China.

    It is the left and the progressive forces in China who agree with Mao that the RMB is the people’s currency and that the most important currency is the Chinese people. It is not usual for this writer to quote from Time magazine, but in the arguments of Fareed Zakaria on the question of overvalued currency, this author would concur, ‘The Real Challenge from China: Its People, Not Its Currency.’

    ‘China is beginning a move up the value chain into industries and jobs that were until recently considered the prerogative of the Western world. This is the real China challenge. It is not being produced by Beijing’s currency manipulation or hidden subsidies but by strategic investment and hard work. The best and most effective response to it is not threats and tariffs but deep, structural reforms and major new investments to make the U.S. economy dynamic and its workers competitive.’

    And Zakaria might have added that the US cannot be competitive as long as it imprisons the best of the young people of colour in the prison industrial complex.

    The lessons learnt from the last capitalist depression are that competitive devaluations, trade wars, currency disputes and new alliances sow the seeds of hostilities and provide the climate for incidents.

    Incidents then spin out of control beyond diplomacy. The contagion from the capitalist crisis will spread and the forces of socialist transformation will have to be even more alert and vigilant to balance the formation of a regional currency block while supporting the creation of the multipolar world to end the era of dollar and pound/sterling hegemony. Those regions of the world that have not awoken to the slow demise of the dollar need to pay closer attention. Planned diversification away from the dollar is preferable to rushed monetary unions. The African peoples have a lot of lessons to learn from both the capitalist crisis in Europe and the new financial arrangements between China and Japan.

    China signs $31bn currency exchange deal with Australia

    Beijing has given indications that it is willing to loosen its grip slightly on the yuan
    Related Stories



    China and Australia have signed a currency swap agreement in a bid to promote bilateral trade and investment.

    It will allow for the exchange of local currencies between their central banks, worth up to 30bn Australian dollars ($31bn; £20bn) over three years.

    The deal is expected to reduce cost for businesses, as they will be able to settle trade terms in local currency.

    It is the latest in a series of similar deals signed by Beijing as it seeks a more global role for the yuan.

    "The main purposes of the swap agreement are to support trade and investment between Australia and China, particularly in local-currency terms," the Reserve Bank of Australia said in a statement.


    Chinese PLA Official to Australia: Choose between us or America

    Philip Wen, Beijing

    May 16, 2012

    AUSTRALIA cannot juggle its relationships with the United States and China indefinitely and must choose a ''godfather'' to protect it, according to a prominent Chinese defence strategist.

    The warning by Song Xiaojun, a former senior officer of the People's Liberation Army, comes after Foreign Minister Bob Carr was told by his Chinese counterpart that Australia's close military alliance with the US was a throwback to the Cold War era.

    Senator Carr yesterday met the man expected to become China's next premier, Li Keqiang, in Beijing. Discussions centred on more comfortable matters including furthering trade and investment and the 40th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the two nations.

    But Australia's strategic position in the Asia-Pacific region remains contentious. "Australia has to find a godfather sooner or later," Mr Song told The Age.

    "Australia always has to depend on somebody else, whether it is to be the 'son' of the US or 'son' of China," he said. "[It] depends on who is more powerful, and based on the strategic environment."

    Best thing for Senkakus: Never let push come to shove

    by Reiji Yoshida


    More toys: The Chinese air force is estimated to have 180 fourth-generation fighters at bases close to the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea, as opposed to 20 for Japan. The islands could be a flash point for a future military conflict between the two nations. | CFP/GETTY/KYODO

    On Jan. 12, Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera observed the annual drill held by the Ground Self-Defense Force’s elite 1st Airborne Brigade in Narashino, Chiba Prefecture.

    Dozens of paratroopers jumped out of aircraft and helicopters flying 340 meters above and landed on the exercise area.

    Some were wearing wet suits, implying that in an actual combat operation, they may have to jump into the sea. Overhead, Maritime Self-Defense Force P-3C Orion anti-submarine aircraft flew by.

    The drill was premised on a scenario in which the Self-Defense Forces had to recapture a remote island that was occupied by an enemy. The enemy was never officially specified, but the goal of the exercise was obvious to any observer: Defend the Senkaku Islands in the East China Sea from the Chinese military.

    The drill was especially significant to Onodera. Earlier in the day, three Chinese Coast Guard ships intruded into Japan’s territorial waters around the Senkakus, pressing Beijing’s claim to the Japan-controlled uninhabited islets.

    “Today, Chinese government ships intruded into the territorial sea around the Senkakus for the first time this year,” Onodera told reporters after the exercise.

    “The role of the 1st Airborne Brigade will become more important than ever,” he said.

    But in recent interviews with The Japan Times, experts and former SDF officers warned that Japan alone would be unable to defend the Senkakus if a full-fledged war breaks out, given the overwhelming number of modern Chinese fighters deployed at Chinese bases on the continent and ready to fly over the East China Sea.

    Japan would find no choice but seek the U.S. military’s help to defend the Senkakus if China ever fully mobilizes its military to attack the islets, the experts and retired officers said.

    And whether the U.S. would actually engage China in a battle to defend the small uninhabited islets would remain unclear until the very last moment, they said.

    “Given the current conditions, Japan (alone) would never be able to defend the Senkakus,” said Ikuo Kayahara, a retired GSDF major general and a professor emeritus at Takushoku University in Tokyo. Kayahara is widely regarded as one of the most prominent Japanese experts on the Chinese military.

    “To recapture a remote island, you need to first win air superiority over the area, and then maritime control,” he said.

    Echoing many other experts, Kayahara said he does not believe the top leaders of China or Japan are willing to start a war over the Senkakus, if only to avoid the economic and political consequences of such action, let alone the collateral damage.

    But Kayahara warned that a military clash, particularly in the air, could in fact take place, even if only by accident. This would fan nationalism in both countries and could escalate into a war.

    “Japan and China don’t have crisis-management systems to contain such an accidental clash. In that sense, we are in a very dangerous situation,” said Kayahara, calling on Tokyo and Beijing to set up hotlines between their top military leaders and with front-line commanders.

    Military analysts agree that the Maritime Self-Defense Force, in particular its ultra-quiet submarines, have maintained an advantage over the Chinese navy in the East China Sea because many of China’s vessels are equipped with older or outdated air-defense and radar systems.

    But China is believed to have deployed about 180 of its mainstay fourth-generation fighter jets in the Nanjing Military Region, and all are capable of reaching the Senkakus, about 420 km away from the nearest Chinese air base on the continent.

    Meanwhile Japan has only about 20 F-15s, which possess a combat capability comparable to the 180 modern Chinese fighters — at the Air Self-Defense Force’s Naha Base in Okinawa, also about 420 km away from the Senkakus...


    Russia accepts Japan's invitation to begin new peace treaty

    MOSCOW Tue Jan 21, 2014 8:16am EST
    1 Comments


    Credit: Reuters/Alexei Nikolsky/RIA Novosti/Kremlin


    Related Topics


    (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin has accepted an invitation to visit Japan, and the two countries will soon start consultations on a peace treaty, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday.

    Lavrov made clear that despite the visit, the dates of which have not been agreed, there would be no swift solution to a territorial dispute that has prevented the signing of a formal peace treaty following the end of World War Two.

    Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe invited Putin to visit Japan in 2014 while on a trip to Moscow last April, during which they agreed to revive talks on resolving the dispute over a chain of islands known in Russia as the Southern Kuriles and in Japan as the Northern Territories.

    "President Putin has accepted the Japanese prime minister's invitation to visit the country," Lavrov told a news conference. "I am certain that we will agree on a date that is convenient for both sides."

    Lavrov said an "improvement in the general atmosphere of Russian-Japanese relations in the last couple of years" had led to the resumption of talks on the disputed islands.

    The islands northeast of Hokkaido were seized by the Soviet Union after it declared war on Japan in August 1945, forcing about 17,000 Japanese to flee, days before Japan surrendered.

    Lavrov said the first round of talks on the islands would be held in Tokyo in several weeks. Recognition of the outcome of World War Two would be vital, he said.

    Putin visited Japan as president in 2005 and as prime minister in 2009. Abe's visit in April was the first official visit to Moscow by a Japanese prime minister in a decade.
    Last edited by vector7; 01-21-2014 at 12:22 PM. Reason: links

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    39,110

    Lightbulb China central bank injects 42 bln USD

    BEIJING, Jan. 21 (Xinhua) -- The Chinese central bank pumped 255 billion yuan (42 billion U.S. dollars) into the money market on Tuesday, easing concerns over financial risks in the world's second-largest economy.
    The liquidity injection came after the Shanghai Composite Index fell below the much-watched 2,000 points level on Monday and to its lowest in six months. A credit crunch in June pounded market sentiment and plunged the benchmark index downward by more than 5 percent in one trading day.
    The reversed repo purchase, which had stopped for four weeks, brought down rates for the seven-day repo and the Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate that surged on Monday. The stock market rebounded 0.86 percent on Tuesday.
    "The recent news of a potential trust default and the fact that the Shanghai stock index dropped below 2,000 suggest market confidence is weak, which may also have put pressure on the government to take action and restore confidence," said Zhang Zhiwei, chief China economist at Nomura.
    The Industrial & Commercial Bank of China, China's largest bank, and China Credit Trust, a shadow lender, have been embroiled in a possible wealth management product default, according to media reports.
    It is feared that the potential three-billion-yuan default could trigger a ripple effect in China's shadow banking, which has rapidly increased its lending to real estate developers, industries beset by overcapacity and local government financial vehicles during the last two years.
    Analysts believe the cash crunches in June and December fortified the central bank's intention to maintain liquidity and avoid sharp money rate rises.
    The People's Bank of China said the move was designed to stabilize the money market and meet surging cash demand ahead of China's seven-day Spring Festival holiday, which starts on January 31. The central bank also asked financial institutions to enhance liquidity and debt management.
    "We don't think the monetary policy stance has turned toward loosening, because the current GDP growth rate is still acceptable to the government," Zhang said.
    Curtailing shadow banking and local government debt were listed as key tasks this year at a December conference setting the tones for economic polices, highlighting Chinese leadership's resolve to de-leverage the economy.
    "Unless the activity growth rate were to surprise on the downside, we would expect top leaders' focus to remain on long-term structural reforms and the threshold of policy easing to remain high," Helen Qiao, chief Greater China economist at Morgan Stanley, wrote in a report last week.
    Morgan Stanley said policy makers would likely push forward reforms and strike a balance between partial de-leveraging and service sector liberalization to stabilize growth.
    Meanwhile, some economists expect China to see more liquidity volatility in 2014 as regulators may further liberalize interest rates and the financial market.
    UBS said in a report that such processes usually led to higher and more volatile interest rates.
    "The government is attempting to achieve a tightening bias to slow credit growth; and the rapid development of China's shadow banking activities has made the system more sensitive to both a credit event in the shadow credit market and regulatory tightening," according to UBS. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/ch..._133063233.htm
    Revelation 14:7
    Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.
    "not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.”

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Central CT
    Posts
    8,597

    Default

    Quoting from MsPaulRevere:

    By allowing the current despot back on the throne, you can be certain nothing will stop him or keep him from me or my children's throats.
    This truth and also the great fear of millions of decent folks.

    Excellent observation.
    ***

    Even the bravest of us rarely has the courage for what he really knows. - Nietzsche

    ***

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Central CT
    Posts
    8,597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moestooge View Post
    Romney is "moderately conservative" like Ted Kennedy was an occasional social drinker.
    "Don't worry Mary Jo. We'll cross that bridge when we get to it."

    The witty words and intentions surrounding the late U-Boat Commander by my late, great friend Mike9or10.
    ***

    Even the bravest of us rarely has the courage for what he really knows. - Nietzsche

    ***

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Mother Lode
    Posts
    2,723

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sleeping Cobra1 View Post
    and a couple of million self-righteous fools who refused to vote
    Lol.

    Give me a man worthy of a vote and I MAY consider the possibility.

    Nah, nevermind.

    Only ONE is worthy, and He ain't a man.

    Rejection of Him caused this mess; thus we get what we deserve.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,696

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kayso View Post
    I stopped reading right there.
    same here.

    Article was over before it started.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    39,110

    Lightbulb Surprise nuclear missile attack

    Published: 11/11/1999 at 1:00 AM
    J.R. Nyquist

    The official Russian acronym for surprise nuclear attack is VRYAN. It derives from the Russian words, “vnezapnoye raketno-yadernoye napadenie.” In the early 1980s the Russians began one of their most intensive intelligence operations, which went by the code-name of VRYAN. This operation involved an unprecedented collaboration between the Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff (GRU) and the Soviet secret police (KGB). This operation was tasked with examining a wide range of U.S. actions to determine if America was preparing for nuclear war.

    According to Russian strategists, preparations for a world war cannot be hidden. After all, nuclear war isn’t something you decide on Tuesday morning and initiate on the following Friday afternoon. Such a war requires intensive planning and preparation over a period of months and years. The destructive effects of nuclear weapons cannot be otherwise mitigated. Therefore, special tasks must be carried out to assure post-war recovery, and for the exploitation of what Russian strategists call “nuclear rocket supremacy.” For example, an attacker must quietly move key factories to secret underground locations. An attacker must also stockpile strategic supplies, raw materials, food, fuel, and machine tools for rebuilding vital industries. In fact, the most dramatic advanced measures would have to appear in open press reports.

    The Russian generals believe that only an extensive disinformation campaign could mask such preparations. If factories are to be moved, a benign explanation must be offered. If troops are mobilized, if security is to be increased at strategic facilities, a phony internal crisis must be presented as the root cause.

    But how could anyone expect to win a nuclear war?

    Nuclear war has two basic objectives. The first objective is the elimination of the enemy’s strategic weapons. The second objective is the preservation of friendly nuclear strength in order to blackmail the surviving countries. A country that successfully destroys all opposing nuclear weapons (while retaining a large nuclear reserve) can dictate the shape of the future.

    In Russian thinking, a nuclear war is not simply an exchange of nuclear strikes. Many countries would be invaded and occupied in the aftermath of a nuclear exchange. Lacking the firepower to strike back, these countries wouldn’t dare to resist with conventional forces. In fact, all resistance would be smashed by Russia’s reserves of nuclear and biological weapons. A resisting country’s administrative centers would immediately suffer obliteration. Biological attacks would depopulate leading cities. Armies would collapse after the bombing of their supply bases. Horrible consequences would follow for millions of people.

    This is how the successful side in a nuclear exchange can translate wholesale slaughter and destruction into a new world order. Even if the prevailing country has been devastated by counter-strikes, its reconstruction is assured by means of nuclear blackmail against undestroyed countries. Such blackmail would allow the prevailing country to rebuild its destroyed infrastructure and feed its people.

    Even if half the people in a country are killed, this is no argument against victory.

    It is true that other countries, besides Russia and America, possess nuclear weapons. Great Britain, France and Israel have several hundred nuclear weapons between them. But these arsenals are small and vulnerable. Bombing Russia and stirring the rubble of cities already bombed would be a laughable kind of deterrence.

    If America’s nuclear forces were ever destroyed, Russia and China would control the earth. No power could resist them. No defense exists to stop them. Therefore, the eyes of the Russian General Staff are on America’s missiles. That is what they care most about. And it’s what they worry about. America’s nuclear forces protect Western civilization from destruction and conquest by the nuclear-armed barbarism of Russia and China.

    The strategists who developed Russia’s VRYAN program understand all of this. In the early 1980s they listed hundreds of indicators of impending nuclear attack. In his book, “War Scare,” former CIA analyst Peter Vincent Pry mentions only a few of the VRYAN indicators. Among these, Pry lists any change in the day-to-day posture of U.S. or NATO forces, unusual high-level meetings, increased intelligence activity, suspicious disinformation, repressive measures against subversives, increased security at strategic sites. Among the economic indicators would be an increase in gold purchases and a drive by American blood banks to build up the blood supply.

    Russian military doctrine has always stressed the need for striking first. A first strike is vital to final success. According to Pry, “Soviet military textbooks written in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s generally endorsed the view that nuclear war could be won and that victory was likely to go to the side that struck first.”

    Any indication of a U.S. first strike would mean that Russia would have to strike even earlier. The reason a first strike is so important has to do with the nature of nuclear missile weapons. One defector from the Soviet General Staff, writing under the name Viktor Suvorov, compared the problem of nuclear war to that of two gunmen in the old West. The man who draws first will probably win the fight. His opponent might well be shot down before he can even pull the trigger.

    Near the beginning of the Cold War many U.S. analysts, generals and politicians realized that nuclear missile weapons were inherently destabilizing because of the need to strike first. There would be strong temptations, they argued, for hitting an opponent that fell behind in a nuclear arms race. The idea was to strike before the weaker side could close the gap.

    This temptation to strike first is so strong that it has even affected Western leaders. At a time when the United States had the only working atomic bombs, Winston Churchill privately urged U.S. leaders to deliver an ultimatum to Russia. In Marc Trachtenburg’s critically acclaimed book, “History and Strategy,” Churchill is quoted as saying, “We ought not to wait until Russia is ready.” In 1948 Churchill argued in the House of Commons for “bringing matters to a head” while America yet retained its atomic monopoly. Churchill told the House of Commons that this approach offered “the best chance of coming out of it alive.”

    Churchill pointed to the extreme aggressiveness of the Russians at a time when the U.S. had all the nuclear weapons. Imagine, said Churchill, what will happen “when they get the atomic bomb and have accumulated a large store.”

    Churchill was not alone in suggesting that the West should destroy its enemy while it had the chance. John von Neumann, a leading mathematician and the founder of game theory, said, “If you say why not bomb them tomorrow, I say why not today? If you say today at 5 o’clock, I say why not one o’clock.”

    This way of thinking may seem shocking for its immorality, and President Truman quickly moved to suppress it, but nobody can deny its logical character. According to Trachtenburg, State Department moderates like Charles Bohlen and George Kennan flirted with the idea of preventive war. Even the New York Times made unusual suggestions when William L. Laurence, the Times science correspondent in 1948, wrote about preemptively bombing Russia’s atomic plants before they could produce any bombs.

    It was all empty talk, of course, because Americans don’t believe in unprovoked nuclear attacks — even against hair-trigger psychopaths like Stalin. Gen. Orvil Anderson, the head of the Air War College, was dismissed by President Truman for advocating a preventive war with Russia. According to Trachtenburg, Anderson had delivered long lectures to students on carrying out a preventive nuclear strike. “Give me the order to do it,” boasted Anderson, “and I can break up Russia’s five A-bomb nests in a week.

    And when I went up to Christ — I think I could explain to Him that I had saved civilization.”

    Similar attitudes were present in other Air Force commanders — most notably in Gen. Curtis LeMay, the first general to command a nuclear offensive, famous for boasting that he was “bombing Japan into the stone age” during World War II. LeMay and Gen. George Kenney, first chief of America’s Strategic Air Command, along with Gen. Nathan Twining, were sympathetic to Anderson’s idea of a preventive nuclear war.

    But as Marc Trachtenburg points out in his book, all the leading officials of the Truman administration hated the preventive war idea. Later, in 1953, President Eisenhower seriously considered expanding the Korean War into China because it had become a bloody mess with no end in sight. Eisenhower did not like the war’s lingering quality. Already, by late 1952 the Korean War had claimed 3 million lives, including more than 50,000 Americans. It was believed that widening the war might bring the Communists to the peace table, or trigger a full blown atomic war with Russia.

    A major U.S. government study was conducted on the consequences of an atomic war with Russia in 1953. The study predicted that most of our European allies would retreat into neutrality. The study also predicted that the war would cost ten million American lives and last for ten years. Nonetheless, the study said that America would win the war. The Communists apparently agreed with this analysis, because after Eisenhower told them his intentions they quickly changed their position and agreed to an armistice on July 27, 1953.

    Never again did an American president seriously threaten world war against the Communist bloc. By 1957 the idea of a winnable nuclear war against Russia had completely died out. It was no longer acceptable. Atomic bombs were being replaced by even more powerful “city busters” of thermonuclear design. By the early 1960s Khrushchev was boasting that Russia was mass producing intercontinental rockets “like sausages.” America’s nuclear superiority finally declined into nuclear parity and then into nuclear inferiority.

    The nuclear stand-off lingers into the present. While the Russians watched carefully for signs of American nuclear war preparations, America remains totally oblivious to Russian preparations.

    What would an American VRYAN list look like?

    In next Monday’s column I will present a list of approximately 30 indicators of things you would expect to see if Russia were contemplating a nuclear war. Do Russia’s present moves conform with these indicators — many of them used by the Kremlin to predict an American nuclear attack?


    http://www.wnd.com/1999/11/6392/
    Revelation 14:7
    Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.
    "not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.”

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    60 Mile North Of Detroit
    Posts
    685

    Default Here We Go Again!!!!

    As I look Back on this Post and I know I admonished Those who Voted OTHER or Just stayed at Home in 2012, I guess we could Use Thunder Thighs Rendition of "What Diffrence Does it Make? I guess the OP is Right, we Have A One Party System In Reality, But like I said The Destruction of this Country is a Absolute Fact with BO at The Helm, and it may have just slowed down with Romney, But When One Considers How Fast Obama, started with EO"s and all the Crap the Republicans have Ate, we are on the Way...


    With Romney we may have had more Time to Finish our Preps, and and we Might not have, the Dollar Collapse will Happen no Matter Who is POTUS, but a Little More time would have been Nice, now its Full Steam ahead into Dangerous Shoals!!!! Good Luck and God Bless all Members of The Tree!!!

    Semper Fi
    Running is not a plan=Running is what you do when a plan Fails!

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Central CT
    Posts
    8,597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yoda View Post
    Was Romney one of the most liberal candidates the GOP could have chosen? Yup. Was he as liberal as Obama? Nope. Was Romney likely to be as hostile to business as Obama, to coal as Obama, to Israel as Obama, to families, to Christians, to the very fabric of traditional American society? Don't think so. Was Romney an expert in running large organizations? Yup. In making them live within their budgets? Yup. In financial turn arounds. Yup.

    The enemy of the good is often the perfect. Politics is a business of fuzzy edges, of compromise, of failure to achieve goals, of the inherently imperfect. It is sheer and utter lunacy to claim that we will have a re-birth by destroying the current system. We might, but it is much more likely that we will in fact end up with a socialist mess, and there are precious few examples of that where return to democracy happens within a lifetime, and even fewer where it does so without the active pressure from a Reaganesque US bankrolling the change under the covers, providing money and arms, or both.

    Let Obama do his worst? Are you insane? His worst might, for example, include your impoverishment, destitution, imprisonment, and as suggested here, your demise. Your attitude reflects an assumption of re-birth. People don't have that luxury, and most societies descend into a worse state, with recovery sometimes including mass executions, and physical destruction of the society. Where is it that you get this 'destroy and rebuild' template?
    Germany was split after WWII, with half its population prisoners for decades. Or rather, half its surviving population. The German Jews were not fortunate to survive their imprisonment, and most of the German males of fighting age were fed to their war machine never to return. The country's industrial base was bombed into oblivion. Only US generosity made their recovery possible. The same for Japan. That Phoenix rose from nuclear ashes with American money. Do you expect the same generosity from Russia? From China? Where will this rebirth come from? Our external enemies, or our internal ones? Iran? The US funded UN?

    Your absolutism will be your destruction. I guess just before it occurs you can reconsider, or, if you are Hindu, look forward to your next life. In the meantime, I don't want Obama to "do his worst", to create destruction in order to make a point. I want America to understand it made a mistake, and to correct it in the next election, while we still have a very little time.

    The same situation was present with Carter, who had created far less damage than Obama, but enough to elect Reagan and to reverse course for a while. This reversal of course was incomplete and of short duration, but it was powerful enough to create a decades lasting economic boom, and to result in the fall of communism in a number of Eastern European countries, not because conditions in those countries were as bad as in, say, Germany at the end of WWII, but rather because the USSR ran out of cash to prop up its satellites. And that happened because the US was prosperous and determined enough under Reagan to play a big game of poker.

    There is nobody big enough and motivated to bail us out if we crash. It will be a long climb back, with little assistance and much interference along the way. And waiting in the wings will be the world governance crowd, for they have looked forward to a crippled US for a long time. Do you not see that Obama IS adopting policies that will destroy, in order to rebuild as he and his ideological backers want? What makes you think that from a position of political weakness, the forces of freedom will be permitted to rebuild as they see fit, when they could not halt the decent that their opponents have long engineered, when they had more tools and the opposition was far less empowered, far less emboldened?

    Geez, what naivete.....

    ^^^THIS^^^

    A powerful commentary on the present shape of things. Very thoughtful, astute and well crafted.

    Of course Obama is pushing and advocating policies, agency rules and ideological platform planking that is geared, without question, to the disabling and destruction of America. It is right there for all to see yet so much is conveniently ignored. The boast for radical transformation of this nation is apparently several notches above the comprehension levels of the man on the street.

    The nation needs a marketable conservative, acceptable to many and designed to offend as few as possible. The 2016 Presidential election is the last chance to take back America from the Marxists, the entitlement advocates and power brokers and those who once again employ their limp wrists, rubber knees and jelly spines to seek "Peace at any Price". A third term by Obama or a new reign by Hitlery will be the death of the nation we have known. The USSA will have arrived and we won't even have any guns to fight back with.

    Good Night, America.
    ***

    Even the bravest of us rarely has the courage for what he really knows. - Nietzsche

    ***

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,290

    Default

    China's nuclear missile drill seen as warning to US not to meddle in region

    Military mouthpiece releases photos of drills involving ICBM able to reach American West Coast after Pentagon upgrades forces in Japan

    PUBLISHED : Thursday, 23 January, 2014, 3:56am
    UPDATED : Thursday, 23 January, 2014, 5:10am

    Minnie Chan minnie.chan@scmp.com




    Photos published by the PLA Daily show for the first time members of the Second Artillery Forces launching a Dongfeng-31 missile. Photo: SCMP

    The People's Liberation Army has for the first time released photos of its most advanced intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) in action - a move seen as a response to US military moves in the region.

    The 17 photos published on the PLA Daily's website on Tuesday provided the first glimpse of a live drill involving the Dongfeng-31 since its delivery to the Second Artillery Corps in 2006.


    Photos published by the PLA Daily show for the first time members of the Second Artillery Forces launching a Dongfeng-31 missile. Photo: SCMP


    The missile has an estimated range of nearly 10,000 kilometres - enough to deliver a nuclear warhead to the capitals of Europe or the west coast of the United States. Military experts said the release was a warning to the US not to interfere in the country's territorial disputes with Japan over the Diaoyu Islands, or Senkakus, in the East China Sea.

    Macau-based military observer Antony Wong Dong cited the Pentagon's decisions to send a dozen advanced F-22 fighter jets to Okinawa and replace the USS George Washington with the younger USS Ronald Reagan at Yokosuka Naval Base near Tokyo.

    "The disclosure of the Dongfeng-31 at this time obviously aims to respond to the United States' two big military moves in Japan, which make Beijing believe it is going to meddle in the territorial disputes between China and Japan," Wong said.

    Several of the photos published by the PLA Daily were also posted on the newspaper's official Sina Weibo account. It was unclear when the drill took place; the captions said sometime this winter.

    The pictures showed a missile fired from a large launcher mounted on a 16-wheeled truck. Operators were shown inside a military camp dressed in protective suits, suggesting that the missile force was simulating the launch of an armed warhead.

    The caption cast the exercise as defensive preparation, saying the soldiers were simulating how to disrupt an enemy's missile attack. The pictures show the launcher was erected on the truck and ready for firing.

    Hong Kong-based defence analyst Ma Ding-sheng said the pictures indicated that the PLA was more confident about showing off its military hardware after decades of secret development.

    "The PLA realises that it needs to increase its transparency, which would also provide them more opportunities to show off their military muscle, as well as quiet questions from the US and other Western countries," Ma said, adding the missiles had so far appeared to help deter threats.

    "I doubt whether the missile is capable of hitting the US, although they claim it has a range up to 10,000 kilometers," Ma said. "All its live-launch drills have happened inside Chinese territory, within 5,000 kilometers. And we never see the PLA shooting missiles to the Western Pacific."

    Non-operational versions of the Dongfeng-31 and the more advanced Dongfeng-31A were displayed publicly on October 1, 1999, the 50th anniversary of the People's Republic of China. The Donfeng-31 is the country's second generation of ICBM, replacing the earlier Dongfeng-4. It was formally delivered to the strategic missile defence force in 2006.

    The Pentagon said at the time that the weapon was built using US missile and warhead secrets obtained through espionage and illegal transfers of technology.


    Russia Plans Cruise Missile Tests, Bomber Patrols for 2014

    19:54 22/01/2014



    The Russian Air Force is preparing to conduct a series of tests of new cruise missiles, as well as carrying out strategic bomber patrols including stops in other countries, the commander of its long-range fleet said Wednesday.

    “In 2014 we are planning practice launches of cruise missiles, including new models,” Gen. Lt. Anatoly Zhikharev told reporters, without specifying the missiles to be fired. Russian planes launched 15 cruise missiles last year.
    Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said last summer that Russia was planning a 30-fold increase of its cruise missile arsenal by 2020.

    The buildup is planned to include the new Raduga Kh-101 cruise missile that can carry an 880-pound (400 kilogram) payload up to 6,000 miles (9,600 kilometers).

    Zhikharev also said that Russia’s long-range air fleet would conduct long-distance patrols this year, including stops at airbases in other countries that will be named in the future.

    In October last year a pair of Tu-160 Blackjack strategic bombers visited Venezuela and Nicaragua while conducting patrols over the Caribbean, in the first such visit since 2008.

    Columbia protested the flights and scrambled jet fighters to escort the bombers, claiming that they had violated its airspace.

    The Tu-160 is a supersonic strategic bomber with variable-sweep wings, designed to engage targets around the globe with nuclear and conventional weapons.



    Russian Motivations for Attacking the United States

    January 19, 2014 - Conspiracy, Featured, Main - Tagged: dave hodges, depopulation, false flag, federal reserve, FEMA, martial law, new world order, obama, red dawn, the common sense show, tyranny, war

    Dave Hodges
    January 19, 2014
    The Common Sense Show


    As reported on KTAR FM radio, Phoenix, AZ., on January 17, 2014, the cyber attacks upon Target Inc., have Russian mafia fingerprints on the identity theft of over one hundred million Americans. If one knows their Russian history, we know that since the pretend collapse of the “former” Soviet Union, the KGB changed uniforms and ran the Russian mafia which also happens to be the origin source of Putin. The notorious Russian mafia, the Russian KGB, there is no difference. For that matter, the notorious drug running America mafia, the CIA (e.g. Air America, Iran-Contra, creation of the LA cocaine street, cocaine- dealing gangs), there is no difference. The CIA and the KGB do not work exclusively for their host nations. These two rogue organizations do the heavy lifting for the banksters who seek to subjugate humanity and impose a dramatic depopulation agenda. For Bible-believing Christians, I am sure that you will take note of how this is foretold in scripture. I will let all of you fill in the details on the Comment Board connected to this article.

    The Last Great American Garage Sale

    Both country’s mafia/intelligence operations have acted as currency destabilization forces as well (see Confessions of An Economic Hit Man). Further, my sources tell me that the story about how these two intelligence operations employed economic sabotage agents to facilitate the promotion of the derivatives market which led to the collapse of the European and American financial markets, necessitating the bailouts. Since the declared end of the Cold War, in the late 1980′s, if a Russian citizen wanted Vodka, jeans or food, they obtained these products from the former KGB (aka the Russian mafia) and these products frequently were obtained on the black market, which became bigger than the “legitimate” economy. Noted enemies of humanity, such as George Soros, are part of this movement designed to collapse economies and hold governments hostage. The American derivatives debt is now listed at a hefty $1.5 quadrillion dollars. The entire GDP of the planet is only listed at between $65 trillion and $79 trillion dollars. What the Bastards from Basel have discovered is that the American economy is resilient because the American people still possess a high degree of creativity in some circles. The banksters fear that a currency collapse may not produce the utter devastation of the United States that was once hoped for. This is what George Soros has worked so hard to achieve. Therefore, Plan B has been initiated. Plan B is the invasion of the United States from both within and without.

    Stark Reminders

    As a reminder, previous parts of this series have documented the existence of Russian troops on American soil. Personally, in the last 30 days, I have now received 53 email notifications of Russian military troops training on American soil. In the previous article, I documented a bilateral agreement between FEMA and the Russian military to bring tens of thousands of Russian troops to American soil. I also previously noted, through the good work of Sherrie Wilcox, that Russian troops have already been spotted in the US wearing Dept of Homeland Security uniforms. See http://youtu.be/sVvvV2VSgew for just one example. I have previously interviewed, on The Common Sense Show, eyewitnesses to a significant Russian troop buildup in the country, with guests, such as Dr. Susan Helman, and others.

    Grave Warnings

    On December 22, 2013, I interviewed former deep-cover CIA agent, Dr. Jim Garrow, who was explicit about the presence of both Russian and Chinese troops in America and in Northern Mexico. He noted that the Russians are operating in cooperation with DHS. This is what Sherrie Wilcox uncovered in the abovementioned video. My insider sources have been providing me with this information for the past 18 months and it matches the Garrow account, word for word. ALL of my sources state that we will have a false flag attack(s) which will be followed by a declaration of martial law and will be largely enforced by Russian and Chinese soldiers. I have also been informed that as communities are forcibly vacated and relocated to detention facilities at stadiums, malls and heretofore secret camps, the remnants, or stragglers, of these communities will be sprayed with specifically designed bio-agents which are specially designed to completely terminate all forms of life which may have evaded the roundups. I am now just beginning to receive another piece of the puzzle which strongly appears to justify the coming bio-agent attacks. Have you ever wondered why various government agencies are hell-bent on obtaining as much DNA as possible? It is being obtained in order to be used in research.This is research which is designed to bypass certain HLA typings. In the past 48 hours, I have been approached by two whistleblowers who have worked in testing facilities both in California and Arizona. In both cases, these whistleblowers tell stories of research related to methodologies on how to bypass all HLA typings with regard to certain pathogens. The research is so volatile that many of the research personnel have fallen ill. Most disturbingly, the connecting dots are suggestive of the fact that some entity, within this country, is doing research on how to make a bio-agent so completely destructive so as not to leave any survivors. If 10 people were to be exposed to Ebola, 90% would die agonizing deaths as the victims would meet their collective demise by bleeding out of every cavity in the body as their organs literally melted down. However, 10% would survive because they would possess a special HLA typing which would help them to recover from the pathogen. The research appears to be seeking to create a pathogen which will be 100% fatal as it will overcome all types of HLA typings. What I am learning from the accounts of both whistleblowers, is that foreign doctors are involved in this research and the experimental subjects medical records are being deleted so as to not leave any trace. My military sources tell me that these pathogens will be delivered through specially designed drones and that both Russian and US intelligence sources are jointly conducting this operation. Now, to the $64 million dollar question, what does this have to do with Russian troops? The Russians have sufficient motivation to engage in an invasion of the United States because it fits both their national interests to do so and it satisfies the banking masters that they and the CIA both serve. Putin and Obama are playing for the same side. Even if Russia and America goes to war, it is planned because they are taking their marching orders from the banksters which control every single central bank on the planet. The following constitutes the Russian motivation for attacking the United States in order to obliterate our country even when a coming economic collapse may not.

    Stalin’s Secret Plans to Invade Alaska In 1951

    It has long been in the cards for Russia to invade the US. In 1999, at a conference held at Yale University, previously secret Russian documents revealed that Russian Dictator Joseph Stalin had undergone extensive planning in preparation to invade North America as early as 1951. The event was one of a series of programs sponsored by the Washington D.C.-based Cold War International History Project (CWIHP), which monitors new documents pertaining to the Cold War. The Yale conference centered on Stalin’s relationship with the United States. These documents, from the Cold War, revealed that Stalin had a definitive plan to attack Alaska in 1951-52 and had undergone major military preparations in anticipation of the invasion. Russia has always considered itself to be landlocked and this served as the major motivation for Russia’s planned incursion which would have given Russia access to good sea ports. Stalin subsequently died and the plans were abandoned, at least temporarily.

    Historic Russian Policy Dictates An American Invasion Is Inevitable

    It is clear that any Russian attack upon the United States will come through Alaska and I am now of the opinion that Russia will not wait for us to attack Iran before attacking the United States. The following paragraphs will demonstrate why Alaska is so vitally important to the fulfillment of Russia’s communist plans for world domination. British geographer and military historian, Sir Halford MacKinder, in1904, wrote an article that changed how politicians and military men viewed the world. It was a perception that influenced Hitler to send his troops eastward in an attack upon Russia in 1940. It was also the driving force that led to the underpinnings for superpower foreign policy which guided foreign policy for both sides during the Cold War. The theory that had so influenced nearly three generations of strategists was called simply, the Heartland Theory.

    Basically, Mackinder’s Heartland Theory viewed geo-political military history as a struggle between land-based and sea-based powers. Mackinder believed the world had become a “closed” system, with virtually no new lands left for the Europeans powers to discover, to conquer, and to fight over without creating chaos elsewhere. According to the theory the common denominator for world conflict has been reduced to sea powers vs. land-based powers which would subsequently struggle for dominance of the world, and the ultimate victor would be in a position to set up a world empire. The determining factor in this struggle was physicalgeography; “Man and not nature initiates, but nature in large measure controls”.


    Obama Is Complicit In the Planned Russian Invasion



    Obama has given away seven strategic, oil-rich Alaskan islands to the Russians at a time when we could be going to war with Russia. This exemplifies Obama’s treason and is the fulfillment of the MacKinder Heartland Theory. At minimum, the oil, alone, from these Islands should be considered to be a military asset. I remain very concerned that these seven islands in the Arctic Ocean and Bering Sea could also be used as a military staging area from which to invade Alaska and defend its new claims of the mineral rich resources at the North Pole. The giving away of seven strategic, oil-rich Islands is a good start to support a claim of treason because Obama is purposely weakening the defense of Alaska. Also, local residents along the Alaskan coast have reported to me that the massive over flights along the coast have all but ceased. The F-22′s have disappeared. The Air Force says the flights have been suspended because of oxygen concerns which are impacting the pilots. Then shouldn’t the flights be replaced by F-16′s? What about national security? These over flights have been a staple of Alaskan defense since the Cold War. If we are close to war with Iran and its ally, Russia, then shouldn’t we beefing up our patrols in Alaska? Recently, the ATF asked for gun registration records in Alaska. Perhaps the Russians need to know, in advance, where the most civilian opposition will come from when they take over Alaska. Perhaps the Russians need to know which areas to deploy HLA resistant bio-weapons.

    Russian troops began to carry out joint anti-terrorism drills in America in May of 2012. What terrorists could they be practicing for? The influx of Russian soldiers maybe began just as a trickle with a couple of dozen of Russians stationed at Fort Carson. However, with the FEMA bilateral agreement, it is clear the floodgates have burst wide open and Obama’s treachery is fully exposed. There exists documented facts which support the reasons why Alaska should be placed on high alert. Russia recently sent four brigades to the Arctic. The Arctic can be used as a staging area for the invasion of the North Pole to protect its recent mineral claims, but more importantly, this area of the Arctic could serve as a base of operations from which to invade Alaska with the help of pre-positioned assets within the state. In March of 2012, with a microphone left on, Obama made an unguarded comment to Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev to be “more lenient on nuclear issues” because he could be more flexible “after the November election”. Does more flexible mean killing the Keystone Pipeline prior to giving away seven rich Alaskan Islands to the Russians? Does more flexible mean letting the Russians train in Colorado Springs and in Alaska? Does being more flexible mean compromising our defense of Alaska?

    More Russian Treachery Revealed

    It is now on the record that Putin said that he was going to make his country the greatest country, economically, as he said in print that he is claiming part of Alaska. Adding fuel to the fire, it is now clear that Russia is also establishing plans for an Arctic industrialization. In geopolitical and military terms, it could be an easy claim to make if the military resistance in Alaska is greatly compromised, and it has been. The last thing that country should do on a potential front line area is to close military facilities and bases, yet, this is exactly what is happening in Alaska. Obama and the Base Realignment and Closure Commission have been closing bases and/or reducing base operations all through Alaska. It has gotten so bad that the Alaskan Governor hired a lobbyist to prevent military reduction. Three years ago, a prominent Russian Professor predicted the end of the United States.

    The professor stated that Alaska would return to the control of Russia and that the United States would be split into six pieces. John McCain recently said “I think it’s very clear that Russian ambitions are to restore the old Russian Empire. Not the Soviet Union, but the Russian Empire.” There is also a tunnel from Russia to Alaska being constructed. Are we funding our own demise with our tax money which is designed to set up Russia’s future? Last summer, Russia challenged west coast detection capabilities of our military by making provocative moves with their submarines inside of our territorial waters. Also, in a stunning move, Putin banned adoptions of Russian children by American parents. Could it be likely that he is looking out for the Russian adoptees as this is a reaction to what Putin knows is coming?

    Conclusion

    To those that say that Russia is a changed nation you are right. Russia has not changed because it is embracing Christianity, its government is decidedly playing for the dark side when it comes to spirituality. The Russians are not embracing democracy as they still kill dissident journalists and the mafia runs the country. To those that think Russia is our friend, you are deluded, naive and vulnerable. Russia is not our friend and if the American military does not step up and stop this madness, you will soon learn how real this threat is. Unlike George H. W. Bush used to constantly say, “God Bless America”, I really mean it. Short of some kind of spiritual intervention, we are all in a great deal of danger.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •