Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Why did the Biden Census Bureau add 2.5 million more residents to blue state populati

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    17,570

    Default Why did the Biden Census Bureau add 2.5 million more residents to blue state populati

    Why did the Biden Census Bureau add 2.5 million more residents to blue state population count?

    by Stephen Moore
    | May 03, 2021 09:42 AM



    There is something very fishy about the new 2020 Census Bureau data determining which states picked up seats and those that lost seats.

    Most of the revisions to the original estimates have moved in one direction: population gains were added to blue states, and population losses were subtracted from red states. The December revisions in population estimates under the Biden Census Bureau added some 2.5 million blue state residents and subtracted more than 500,000 red state residents. These population estimates determine how many electoral votes each state receives for presidential elections and the number of congressional seats in each state.

    Is this a mere coincidence?

    Remember, the House of Representatives is razor-thin today, with the Democrats sporting just a three-seat majority with five seats currently vacant. So a switch in three or four seats in 2022 elections could flip the House and take the gavel away from current Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats. A population shift of 3 million is the equivalent of four seats moving from R to D.

    The original projections for the census reapportionment had New York losing two seats, Rhode Island losing a seat, and Illinois perhaps losing two seats.
    Instead, New York and Illinois only lose one seat, and Rhode Island loses no seats. Meanwhile, Texas was expected to gain three seats, Florida two seats, and Arizona one seat. Instead, Texas gains only two seats, Florida only one, and Arizona none.

    Was the Census Bureau count rigged? Was it manipulated by the Biden team to hand more seats to the Democrats and to get more money (federal spending is often allocated based on population) for the blue states?

    The evidence is now only circumstantial, but when errors or revisions are almost all only in one direction, the alarm bells appropriately go off.

    Here are some of the strange outcomes in the census revisions just released:
    1) New York — We’ve been tracking the annual population/migration changes between states since the last census of 2010. According to census data over the past decade, New York lost about 1.3 million residents on net to other states. (This does not include immigration, births, and deaths.) Still, this is a population loss equivalent to two, maybe three, lost congressional seats. But the final numbers ADDED more than 860,000. That’s roughly twice the population of Buffalo and Rochester — combined. This is the state that has lost by far the largest population over the past decade.

    2) Many deep blue states had 2020 census numbers significantly revised upward from their December estimates: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

    3) Many red states had 2020 census numbers significantly lower than their 2020 estimates: Arizona, Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas.

    4) Going back to the 2010 census, the final headcount in every state was within 0.4% of the original estimate, and 30 of them were within 0.2%. This time around, 19 states were more than 1% off, 7 were more than 2% off, NY was more than 3.8% off, and NJ was more than 4.5% off.

    5) Virtually every one of the significant deviations from the estimates favored Democrats. Just five states in the 2020 census were within the same margin (0.41%) that all states were within from the 2010 census.

    Maybe the 2010 estimates were abnormally accurate, or perhaps the 2020 estimates were unusually inaccurate. The Census Bureau needs to tell Congress why these revisions under Obama were so much more significant than usual and weighted in one direction: toward the blue Biden states.


    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...pulation-count
    ”The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Partisan, Region 1: Occupied Territories
    Posts
    13,336

    Default

    I don't believe we'll see another honest election in this country. A long time coming but here we are.
    Who murdered Ashli Babbitt?
    I self-identify as vaccinated.
    Welcome to the 70’s Millennials!

    Everything I post is Fiction and should not be taken seriously by anyone....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Tree of Liberty
    Posts
    7,849

    Default

    The question is what was the LAST honest election? When you see the likes of pelosi, Schiff, and Schumer, as well as the all star intellectual powerhouses like jackson lee, and Hank Jackson get elected over and over... how long has the dem election fraud machine already been running? Certainly Obama’s 2nd election was fraud, and the only reason Trump beat Clinton was they completely underestimated the landslide voting against the criminal.
    Obviously the last presidential charade proved without a shadow of doubt to what lengths the fraud machine can go to now, and how little honest people can do to stop it.
    A warrior lives by acting, not by thinking about acting, nor by thinking about what he will think when he has finished acting.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    783

    Default

    The election was honest according to USA's Noahide Code. That is why President Trump did absolutely nothing effective to contest the election. He was following orders. Netanyahu even told Him who NOT to talk to. And, He was obedient.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    783

    Default

    x decided picture was not appropriate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •