Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Kansas City Follows West Coast Progressives In Building Village For Homeless

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007

    Default Kansas City Follows West Coast Progressives In Building Village For Homeless

    Kansas City Follows West Coast Progressives In Building Village For Homeless

    by Tyler Durden

    Wednesday, May 05, 2021 - 11:10 PM
    Progress politicians have been pitching free public housing for years as a cure for housing, wealth, and all sorts of other inequalities. Several West Coast cities have implemented housing first initiatives, with taxpayers shelling out more than one billion dollars in the last half-decade. Years later, the attempt to break the homeless in perpetuity hasn't worked out exactly as politicians promised.

    Ignoring the failures on the West Coast, Kansas City leaders have been exploring a similar housing first initiative for residents experiencing homelessness.
    According to The Kansas City Star, Kansas City officials are considering a "150-bed village" almost like the "Hoovervilles" of the 1930s Great Depression. If built, maybe the village should be called "Bidenville."

    Here's an example of one of the tiny homes classy sheds.

    Local officials have yet to decide on the exact location of the new homeless village and provided limited details about the construction.

    Last week, Mayor Quinton Lucas said the homeless village would support Kansas City's homeless population by allowing them "a sense of dignity and pride in housing options."
    "We've recognized for too long — for years, for generations — we have not done enough," Lucas said. "We have not done enough to be creative. We have not done enough to help people get back on their feet."
    "Kansas City is not looking the other way anymore," the mayor added.

    We've seen this story before. West Coast politicians, especially in San Francisco and Los Angeles, have made grand announcements about solving homelessness through housing first initiatives, but none seem to be working.

    Touted by influential political leaders, activists, and media outlets in Los Angeles, the simple solution was to build more housing for the homeless. Five years later, a billion dollars down the drain, the project has been plagued by construction delays, massive cost overruns, and accusations of corruption.

    Meanwhile, unsheltered homelessness jumped 41%, vastly outpacing the construction of new supportive housing units. Streets are also becoming more dangerous, drug use is skyrocketing, and public disorder is out of control.

    Without acknowledging success, Los Angeles recently called for more shelters for the entire homeless population of skid row by October. A similar story is also playing out in San Francisco.

    So back to Kansas City, as if officials there have yet to publicly acknowledge the failures of the housing first initiatives on the West Coast - it appears they are diving headfirst into a destructive policy.

    But again, none of that matters when City Manager Brian Platt said the housing project would be partially funded with federal stimulus.
    Platt said, "This is a big part of that recovery and relief for people in the city."

    On top of the funding for the homeless village, the federal government is also paying people not to work. This is not a recovery - this is the nation diving into socialism.
    ”The trouble with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010


    The vast majority of homeless are in their situation because they WANT to be. I'd estimate 80% at least.

    Most of the rest, perhaps, would include families - usually moms + kids - that end up that way through NOT marrying the fathers. That said, they're still the minority of homeless, and far easier to deal with.

    In my neck of the woods, we have a couple of charities that help such families, and seem to have it under control. There aren't a lot of homeless around here - because winters in New England are a b**ch.

    And, for the most part, coddling them, doesn't happen.

    It's as simple as that - give a certain class of people JUST ENOUGH to survive and allow them NOT to work, and they're quite satisfied. Seriously.

    This has been known for over 200 years. Charles Dickens, in his book "Oliver Twist" described these people ( in conjunction with "Work Houses" ) in great detail IN 1837!

    Stop subsidizing them, and the problem disappears.

    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Withdraw consent!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts